AP Gov. Incorporated Cases

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

12 Terms

1
New cards

Barron v. Baltimore

Bill of rights restrained only the nat. gov., not the states or cities

2
New cards

Gitlow v. New York

Freedoms of press and speech are “fundamental personal rights and liberties protected by the due process clause of the 14th amendment from impairment by the states” as well as by the federal government

3
New cards

Lemon v Kurtzman

laws that provide aid to church - related schools must follow:

  1. have secular legislative purpose

  2. Have primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion

  3. Not foster an excessive government “entanglement” with religion

4
New cards

Near v. Minnesota

1st amendment protects newpapers from prior restraint

5
New cards

Brandenburg v. Ohio

Gov. cannot punish inflammatory speech unless it is directed to or producing imminent lawless action

6
New cards

Roth v. US

“obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press”

7
New cards

Miller v. California

Community standard be used to determine whether material is obscene, defined as appealing to a “purient interest”, being “paitently offensive” and lacking in “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value”

8
New cards

NYT v. Sullivan

To win damage suits for libel public figures must prove that the defamatory statements about them were made with “actual malice” and reckless disregard for the truth

9
New cards

Texas v. Johnson

Struck down a law banning the burning of the flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the 1st amend.

10
New cards

District of Colombia vs. Heller

2nd amendment protects individual rights to posses a firearm. the right is unconnected with service in a malitia and that individual may use a firearm for lawful purposes such as self defense within the home

11
New cards

Mapp v. Ohio

Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to the states

12
New cards

Miranda v. Arizona

Guidelines for police questioning of accused persons to protect them against self incrimination and their right to counsel