AP Gov. Incorporated Cases

studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
learn
LearnA personalized and smart learning plan
exam
Practice TestTake a test on your terms and definitions
spaced repetition
Spaced RepetitionScientifically backed study method
heart puzzle
Matching GameHow quick can you match all your cards?
flashcards
FlashcardsStudy terms and definitions

1 / 11

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.

12 Terms

1

Barron v. Baltimore

Bill of rights restrained only the nat. gov., not the states or cities

New cards
2

Gitlow v. New York

Freedoms of press and speech are “fundamental personal rights and liberties protected by the due process clause of the 14th amendment from impairment by the states” as well as by the federal government

New cards
3

Lemon v Kurtzman

laws that provide aid to church - related schools must follow:

  1. have secular legislative purpose

  2. Have primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion

  3. Not foster an excessive government “entanglement” with religion

New cards
4

Near v. Minnesota

1st amendment protects newpapers from prior restraint

New cards
5

Brandenburg v. Ohio

Gov. cannot punish inflammatory speech unless it is directed to or producing imminent lawless action

New cards
6

Roth v. US

“obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press”

New cards
7

Miller v. California

Community standard be used to determine whether material is obscene, defined as appealing to a “purient interest”, being “paitently offensive” and lacking in “serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value”

New cards
8

NYT v. Sullivan

To win damage suits for libel public figures must prove that the defamatory statements about them were made with “actual malice” and reckless disregard for the truth

New cards
9

Texas v. Johnson

Struck down a law banning the burning of the flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the 1st amend.

New cards
10

District of Colombia vs. Heller

2nd amendment protects individual rights to posses a firearm. the right is unconnected with service in a malitia and that individual may use a firearm for lawful purposes such as self defense within the home

New cards
11

Mapp v. Ohio

Protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to the states

New cards
12

Miranda v. Arizona

Guidelines for police questioning of accused persons to protect them against self incrimination and their right to counsel

New cards

Explore top notes

note Note
studied byStudied by 1 person
808 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 16 people
847 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 30 people
704 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 54 people
185 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 181 people
919 days ago
5.0(2)
note Note
studied byStudied by 35 people
243 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 3 people
51 days ago
5.0(1)
note Note
studied byStudied by 21 people
612 days ago
5.0(1)

Explore top flashcards

flashcards Flashcard (59)
studied byStudied by 3 people
147 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (35)
studied byStudied by 10 people
549 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (415)
studied byStudied by 6 people
631 days ago
4.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 5 people
701 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (104)
studied byStudied by 117 people
371 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (30)
studied byStudied by 29 people
423 days ago
5.0(2)
flashcards Flashcard (57)
studied byStudied by 17 people
707 days ago
5.0(1)
flashcards Flashcard (40)
studied byStudied by 35 people
7 minutes ago
5.0(1)
robot