1/24
mbb1
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Divisions of LTM
declarative memory (explicit)
non-declarative memory (implicit)
Declarative memory (explicit):
“Knowing what, why, where, and when”
Facts, events, locations, autobiographical knowledge
Reminiscence of personally experienced events
Hippocampal-dependent
Non-declarative memory (implicit)
“knowing how”
Motor skills (e.g., riding a bike)
Habits (proceduralised memories - driving the route to work without thinking)
Cognitive skills (e.g., reading)
Non-hippocampal dependent
sub-divisions of declarative memory: episodic and semantic memories
Endel Tulving proposed that declarative memory can be subdivided into the episodic and semantic memory systems
episodic memory
semantic memory
Episodic memory
Vivid first-person recall of personally experienced events
When/where memories
Contextualised memory
‘Mental time travel’
Semantic memory
General knowledge of facts about the world and yourself
What/Why memories.
Abstract knowledge (includes abstract self-knowledge)
Non-declarative memory
Non-declarative memory is revealed when previous experience facilitates (improves) performance on a task
The improvement in performance does not require conscious recollection of the prior learning experiences.
We get better at things with experience and practice.
We learn associations between recurring stimuli in the environment
Subdivisions of non-declarative memory
procedural memory
priming
classical conditioning
operant conditioning
non-associative learning
habituation
sensitization
Procedural memory
learning and performance of motor and cognitive skills
Priming
demonstrated by a change in the ability to identify a stimulus as the result of prior exposure to that stimulus, or a related stimulus.
E.g., Associative/semantic priming
the prior presentation of the word “nurse” facilitates subsequent identification of the word “doctor”
More frequently encountered words are easier to perceive and comprehend - the resting level of activation in memory is higher (activated more quickly).
classical conditioning (associative learning)
Learning to attend to a formerly neutral stimulus because it has become associated with a meaningful stimulus.
Operant conditioning (associative learning)
Learning to produce/avoid a behaviour because it has become associated with rewarding/punishing consequences
Habituation
learning to ignore a stimulus because it is trivial (e.g., screening out background noise).
sensitization
Learning to attend to a potentially threatening stimulus
The architecture of LTM
declarative
facts
events
Both facts and events combined in medial temporal lobe
non declarative
Priming
cortex
Procedural (skills and habits)
striatum
Associative learning: classical and operant conditioning
emotional responses
amygdala
skeletal musculature
cerebellum
Non associative learning: habituation and sensitization
reflex pathways
The amnesias
Deficits in memory caused by brain damage, disease, drug abuse, or psychological trauma.
The selective deficits in memory processes seen in cases of amnesia provide support for the proposed division between the declarative and non-declarative memory systems.
Retrograde amnesia
An inability to remember episodes acquired before the brain injury
Usually temporally graded
Anterograde amnesia
An inability to recall any declarative knowledge experienced after the time of the brain injury
Inability to learn and retain (consolidate) new declarative knowledge (episodic and semantic)
The case of H.M
Henry Gustav Molaison (1926-2008)
Removal of the medial portion of both temporal lobes, including the hippocampi, to treat epilepsy
Epileptic seizures controlled But….
Temporally-graded retrograde amnesia
Memory worst for personally experienced events from years just before the operation
Severe anterograde amnesia
Could not consolidate or retrieve new episodic memories
Severely impaired ability to learn new semantic facts.
For example, H.M. did not acquire new vocabulary introduced since 1953 despite frequent exposure to radio and TV.
Normal sensory and working memory (STM)
For example, normal digit span ability
Fergus Craik’s contention
memory is the outcome of the normal processes of perceiving and comprehension
Brenda Milner’s interrogation
“My amnesic patients have no trouble perceiving and comprehending events, they are clearly capable of processing to deep semantic levels—yet they don’t remember things.
How does that fit with your theory?”
Role of hippocampus in consolidation of declarative memories
The severe anterograde amnesia that results from removal of hippocampus bilaterally indicates that these structures must be crucial for the consolidation of new declarative information.
Craik (2020) conceded that cases like H.M. forced him to adjust his account of elaborative encoding to include not just the process of interacting meaningfully with information in working memory, but also an additional process of consolidation, mediated by the hippocampus
Learning in amnesia: Dissociation of declarative and non-declarative memory
Anterograde amnesiacs are capable of new procedural learning (learning a new motor skill).
For example, the mirror-tracing task
Despite stating that they have never performed the task before, they show an improvement over time.
This demonstrates that procedural learning can proceed independently of the brain systems required for declarative memories
Preserved non- declarative memory in anterograde amnesia
Further studies show that patients with anterograde amnesia show other types of preserved non-declarative memories
Intact classical and operant conditioning
Intact priming effects.
Normal habituation and sensitisation
Also, patients with Korsakoff’s syndrome, depressed patients undergoing bilateral ECT, patients with anoxic encephalopathy, who all suffer anterograde amnesia