1/41
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
what explains firm profitability: industry
(10-20%) attractive to unattractive industry structues
what explains firm profitability: firm
(30-45%) range is sustainable competitive disadvantage to sustainable competitive advantage
what explains firm profitability: other/environmental
(35-60%) strategic management is interested in improving firm profitability, must understand these operational
external/general environment analysis
macro-environment/ PESTEL (political, economic, social, technological, ecological, legal)
global (porter’s diamond)
competitive environment/industry environment/ “task” environment
structure of the industry/porter’s five forces analysis
strategic groups
life cycle
competitor
internal environment analysis
firm strengths and weaknesses, capabilities, core competencies, and sustainable competitive advantage, V.R.I.O
significance of external environment is that
firms cannot control them directly
PESTEL: political
the arena in which organizations and interest groups compete for attention and resources
PESTEL: economic
the nature and direction of the economy
PESTEL: sociocultural and demographic
encompasses society’s attitudes and cultural values and consists of attributes such as population size, age structure, geographic distribution, ethnic mix, and income distribution
PESTEL: technological
emerging products and processes which may translate knowledge into products, processes, and materials
PESTEL: environmental/ecological
broad environmental issues such as the natural environment, global warming, and sustainable economic growth
PESTEL: legal
laws, regulations, litigious environment, risk management
political forces
tort reform
americans with disabilities act
deregulation of utility and other industries
increases in federally mandated minimum wages
taxation at local, state, federal levels
legislation on corporate governance reforms
economic forces
interest rates
unemployment
consumer price index
trends in GDP
changes in stock market valuations
sociocultural/demographic forces
more women in the workforce
increase in temporary workers
greater concern for fitness
greater concern for environment
postponement of family formation
aging population
rising affluence
changes in ethnic composition
geographic distribution of population
greater disparities in income levels
technological forces
genetic engineering
emergence of internet technology
computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems
research in synthetic and exotic materials
pollution/global warming
miniaturization of computing technologies
wireless communication
environmental/ecological segment
environment impact of operations
environmental impact of product/service
natural resource availability
climate change
environmental regulation
legal forces
local, state, federal laws
property rights
intellectual property rights
regulations
no-discrimination
case law
competitive environment
sometimes called the task or industry environment
includes: competitors, customers, suppliers, substitues
porter’s five forces model
the competitive environment diagram includes what in the middle?
rivalry
the competitive environment includes what factors
threat of new entrants
customer power
threat of substitutes
supplier power
porter’s five forces of competition framework includes what in the middle
industry competitor: rivalry among existing firms
porter’s five forces of competition include
suppliers: bargaining power of suppliers
substitutes: threat of substitutes
buyers: bargaining power of buyers
potential entrants: threat of new entrants
the threat of new entrants
profits of established firms in the industry may be eroded by new competitors
high entry barriers lead to low threat of new entries
economies of scale
product differentiation
capital differentiation
capital requirement
switching costs
access to distribution channels
cost disadvantages independent of scale
the bargaining power of buyers
buyers threaten an industry
force down prices
bargain for higher quality or more services
play competitors against each other
ex: walmart as a buyer
the bargaining power of buyers: a buyer is powerful when
it’s concentrated or purchases large volumes relative to seller sales
the products it purchases from the industry are standard or undifferentiated
the buyer faces few switches costs
it learns low profits
the buyers pose a credible threat of backward integration
the industry’s product is unimportant to the quality of the buyer’s products or services
the bargaining power of suppliers
suppliers can exert power by threatening to raise prices or reduce the quality of purchased goods and services
the bargaining power of suppliers: a supplier group will be powerful when
the supplier group is dominated by a few companies and is more concentrated than the industry it sells to
the supplier group is not obliged to contend with substitute products for sale to the industry
the industry is not an important customer of the supplier group
the supplier’s product is an important input to the buyer’s business
the supplier group’s products are differentiated, or it has built up switching costs for the buyer
the supplier group poses a credible threat of forward integration
the threat of substitute products and services
substitutes limit the potential returns of an industry
ceiling on the prices that firms in that industry can profitably charge
a substitute is
a product/service which provides the same function as the product/service but in a different form
the intensity of rivalry among competitors in an industry
jockeying for position
price competition
advertising battles
product introductions
increased customer service or warranties
the intensity of rivalry among competitors: interacting factors lead to intense rivalry
numerous or equally balanced competitors
slow industry growth
high fixed costs
lack of differentiation or switching costs
capacity augmented in large increments
high exit barriers
two unassailable assumptions in industry analysis
no two firms are totally different
no two firms are exactly the same
cluster of firms that share similar strategies
breadth of product and geographic scope
price/quality
degree of vertical integration
type of distribution system
rivalry is strongest in the
same strategic group
environmental and competitive forces impact the strategic groups ___
differently
some strategic groups are more
profitable than others
mobility barriers restrict
movement between strategic groups
the value of strategic groups as an analytical tool includes
identify barriers to mobility that protect a group from attacks by other groups
identify groups whose competitive position may be marginal or tenuous
chart the future direction of firms’ strategies
thinking through the implications of each industry trend for the strategic groups as a whole
identify barriers to mobility that
protect a group from attacks by other groups
identify groups whose
competitive position may be marginal or tenuous