1/40
Chapter 8
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Love
Desire to enter, maintain, or expand relationship with an entity
- Ex: I love myself
-Ex: I love myself family
-Ex: I love chicken wings
-Ex: I love Natalie Portman
Four dimensions of love: Culture Value
Is love a desirable or undesirable state?
Four dimensions of love: Sexuality
Should love be sexual or nonsexual?
Four dimensions of love: sexual orientation
should love only involve other-sex partners?
Martial status
should we only love our spouses or others?
Sternbergs triangle of love: Passion
Physiological arousal, sexual attraction
Sternbergs triangle of love: Intimacy
closeness, sharing, support, concern
Sternbergs triangle of love: commitment
conscious decision to remain in relationship
low Intimacy, low passion, low commitment
non-love
high intimacy, low passion, low commitment
liking
low intimacy, high passion, low commitment
infatuated
low intimacy, low passion, high commitment
empty
high intimacy, high passion, low commitment
romantic
high intimacy, low passion, high commitment
companionate
intimacy low, passion high, commitment high
fatuous
intimacy high, passion high, commitment high
consummate
Love over time
Passion starts off high and declines as relationship continues in terms of Sex(18 times/ month) wear mark. 2-3 years around 9 times /month, and 10 years sex? Intimacy and commitment increase through out relationship
Acker and Davis (1992) Study
Measured passion, intimacy, commitment
Relationship length
Relationship stage
Relationship satisfaction
Results: Intimacy was always important for satisfaction but did not become more or less important. Passion started off high than decreased only to increase and go back up again after decline. Commitment became more and more important as relationship continues.
Companionate love
Help partner stay together
Solves the commitment problem
Styles of loving (Lee, 1973) study: Eros
Passionate love, “love at first sight”
Styles of loving (Lee, 1973) study Ludus
Game playing love, several partners at once
Styles of loving: Storage
Friendship love, de-emphasizes passion
Styles of loving: Mania
Possessive, dependent love, obsession
Styles of loving: Agape
Selfless love, giving, altruistic, duty
styles of loving: Progma
shopping list love, logical and practical
Gender differences in love
More similar than different
Men more likely to believe in “Love at first sight”
Men want their love to be passionate
Women are more cautious and selective
Women feel passion more slowly
Ackerman, Griskevicious, and Li (2011) study
Scenario in which you are in a new relationship and your partner says “I love you”
Ps told to imagine they either have or have not had sex yet
Measured happiness to hearing “I love you”
Results: In Pre-Sex group both men/women were happy to hear I love you but men were slightly happier. With post-sex both were happy as well but women were more happier to hear I love you
Love and Biology
Passion love releases dopamine
Companionate love releases oxytocin
-Promotes a soothing sense well-being
-Enduring attachments to those who become associated with its presence in bloodstream
Love is blind
when people feel romantic attraction, they tend underestimate or ignore their lover’s faults
When men expected to date a woman they thought her lousy work was better than it was
Passion
state of intense longing for union with another
Two factors of passionate attraction
- Physiological arousal
-Belief that the other person caused arousal
White et al (1981) Study
men ran in place for 15 seconds or 120 seconds
Say a video of woman they expected to meet
She was either attractive or unattractive
Rated how attracted to women they were
Results: Men who jogged for longer thought the lady was more attractive than those who jogged for 15 seconds in attractive group. In unattractive group men found her as less attractive in both categories of time but those who jogged longer found her less attractive than those who jogged for 15 seconds.
kendrick et al. (1990) study
Men and women rate traits on how important they are for a variety of mating settings
-Date, sex, committed relationship, marriage
Minimum acceptable criteria
-A measure of standards
Results: For women there standards went up as commitment went up. For men it was the same besides sex (tend to have lower standards).
Moss and Maner (2016) study
Manipulate sex ratio perceptions
Measured SOI and same-sex aggression
Ps more into casual sex when they perceived more women than men
Ps more aggressive toward desirable same sex rivals when majority sex
-Not more aggressive when minority sex
Not toward less-desirable rivals
Permissiveness with affection standard
Premarital sex acceptable if it occurs within committed, caring relationship
Men slightly more permissive than women especially regarding casual premarital sex
America more conservative than other industrialized countries about pre marital sex
Cultural differences in sexual permissiveness related to pathogen prevalence
Menston and Buss (2007) study
Reasons for having sex
-Emotional reasons, physical aspects, pragmatic (do it to accomplish goal), insecurity
Men and women equally likely to have sex for emotional reasons
Men more likely to have sex for all other reasons
Frequency of sex
status of relationship (are they in long term or short term relationship)
Age
Length of relationship
Sexual orientation
Sexual satisfaction
when frequency is close to desired frequency
When ratio of sex to arguments is high
when sex is one of the many other positive activities S
Self determination theory: Autonomy
choose and control own activities
Self-determination theory: Competence
Confident and capable
Self determination theory: Relatedness
close and connected
Baumeister (2000) Study
Erotic plasticity
Women’s sexuality is more plastic than men’s
Women’s “total sexual outlet” (how many orgasms you have) tends to fluctuate
women’s sexual attitudes are influenced by peers and religious beliefs more than men’s
Women engage in more attitude inconsistent sexual behavior than do men