1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
objectivism
the belief that certain things especially moral truths, exist independently of human knowledge or perception of them
objections for objectivism
??
divine command theory
the belief that what’s moral and immoral is commanded by the divine (god)
objections for divine command theory
assumes god exists
Euthyphro dilemma
arbitrariness
independence
natural law theory
a moral theory that suggests there are inherent laws in nature that govern human behavior and ethics, based on principles of reason and morality. It asserts that certain ethical principles are universal and can be discovered through reason.
derived from reason
the idea that certain laws exist independent of human action
argument for natural law theory
human nature is similar in essential respects
moral principles are functions of human needs and interest
some principles meet these needs and interests better than others
principles that meet 3 are objectively valid
therefore, there are objectively valid moral principles that apply to everyone
problems with natural law theory
assumes god
if something is a matter of fact, it cannot also be a matter of value
to say that God or nature has purpose is to make a claim about a matter of fact
utilitarianism
the view that the right actions tends toward the production of the greatest happiness for all considered
problems with utilitarianism
problem of no rest (over- demandingness)
problem of consequences
problem of justice
Utilitarianism:
problem of no rest
going to movies instead of donating to charity example
Utilitarianism:
problem of consequences
when to calculate? happiness, going to college example
Utilitarianism:
problem of justice
locking up a violent man in order to protect society from further violence
DCT
the Euthyphro problem
are right actions right because God commands them?
are right actions commanded by God because they are right?
the dilemma is commonly interpreted as starting with the question “what makes God’s commands good?” if they are good because they are God’s this seems to leave morality arbitrary and unconstrained. if the commands are good independent of god, then it seems that DC is irrelevant to the grounding of morality.