1/4
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Go-to points and evaluations for subsidies
Point | Evaluation |
Lower prices for consumers | Opportunity cost to government |
Higher profits for firms → more jobs | Firms become dependent on subsidy and become lazy/inefficient |
Higher profits for firms → more investment |
Go-to points and evaluations for minimum price
Point | Evaluation |
Higher minimum price → reduces consumers’ overconsumption caused by incomplete information | Inelastic demand → consumption may not decrease significantly |
Higher minimum price → reduces consumers’ overconsumption caused by negative externalities | Unintended consequences → black markets will sell below minimum price illegally → funding crime |
Higher minimum price → firm can make higher profit | Higher price → lower sales → may decrease profits |
Go-to points and evaluations for maximum price
Point | Evaluation |
Lower, fairer prices → increase consumer surplus and equality | Excess demand → limits access → unfair |
Lower prices → stop underconsumption of goods with external benefits | Lower prices → less incentive to invest in quality → quality decreases |
Lower prices → stop underconsumption of goods with incomplete information (e.g. not knowing full health benefits of milk so under-consuming) |
Go-to points and evaluations for indirect tax
Point | Evaluation |
If tax set = size of external cost → will internalise negative externality | Difficult to quantify external cost → so difficult to set right size for tax |
Tax increase price of goods → reduces overconsumption because of incomplete information (e.g. not knowing health costs of cigarettes) | Inelastic demand → tax won’t reduce overconsumption |
Tax raises tax revenue | Black markets |
Go-to points and evaluations for state provision
Point | Evaluation |
Solves the free-rider problem | Opportunity cost: state provision is expensive and means the government can’t spend in other areas; worsening its budget deficit. |
State provision stops underconsumption of goods (which might occur because of external benefits or information gaps) | Admin costs: government is not a profit-maximiser → no profit incentive → so it will let its admin costs (like paperwork) rise too high |
Lower, fairer prices → improves consumer surplus and equality |