1/28
TEST 1
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Structuralism
wilhelm wundt
structure and characteristics of mind through introspection (analyze own thoughts)
Functionalism
william james
purpose and function of mind (influenced by natural selection)
psychodynamic
sigmund freud
shaping unconscious mind
experiences from childhood shape adult behaviours
behaviourism
watson
observable behaviour
skinner
reinforcement and punishment changes behaviour
cognitivism
piaget and neisser
thinking effects behaviour
how do we know things
authority
reason
observation
scientific method
question
explaination
research
hypothesis must be precise enough that it could be proven false
facilitated communication
communication facilitated by 3rd person
eg. an nonverbal autistic using someone to help them speak
found that comms from person was actually just the facilitator
steps needed to conduct research
question
participants
operational definition
make research into testable procedures (how can you test that alcohol = aggression?)
Random selection
increasing sample accuracy by choosing people from a larger population so that there is an equal chance of getting chosen
eliminates some bias
Methods of research
descriptive
relationship
cause & effect
interval validity
how well study was conducted
how do you know your results were bc of what you think caused it
external validity
how applicable are findings in the real world
naturalistic study
just following people in a real world setting and observing
very realistic
very high EV
have a lack of control and ends up taking a lot of time
case
examine 1 person over a period of time (they usually have a unique characteristic/disease)
qualitative data for low frequency events
point is to just record that something exists and how it works
low EV
self-report/survey
participants describe their own behavior
careless responses
misunderstanding for certain questions
response bias: participants sometimes will lie to make themselves look better
test-retest
do the same test a couple months later and compare it to the first test and see if anything changed
inter-rater
have multiple people look at the tests and see if anything is different between the observers
validity
how well a measure measures the variable its intended to
correlation/non-correlation
see if there is a relationship between variables
only observing variable
positive correlation
as one variable increases so does the other (positive slope)
negative correlation
as one variable increases the other decreases (negative slope)
no correlation
no relationship between variables
correlation coefficient
measured from -1 to +1
closer to 1 = more correlation
Confounds
3rd variable
can create misleading association between variables
any variable that differs between experimental and control groups other than independent variable
can either remove them or study them
experimental method
causation because u manipulated independent variable
expectany effect
participant behaviour changes because of researcher expectation
use double-blind design
demand characteristics
research leads participants to guess purpose of study and change behaviour
ethics in research
informed consent
protection from harm and discomfort
deception and debriefing
if you hide the purpose for the experiment you have to reveal the true experiment after