Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Social and political sustainability
Jeopardized by gaping domestic and global inequality
Growing inequality
Potent and proximate cause of environmental degradation
People at either end of the income spectrum
Are more likely than those in the middle to damage the Earth’s ecological health
Rich people
Consume a huge and disproportionate share of the Earth’s food, Energy, raw materials, and manufactured goods
Poor people #1
Their poverty drives them to damage and abuse the environment
Poor people #2
They are able to afford mainly older, cheaper, less durable, less efficient, and more environmentally damaging products
Poor people #3
Pressure to modify behavior or curtail consumption even more
Affluent people
Minimal consequences for modifying their lifestyles
Poor people vs Rich people
Impact and experience environmental problems in different ways
Short-term practices
Abbreviated fallow periods
Harvests exceeding regeneration rates
Depletion of top soil
Deforestation
Being landless
Common condition in many LDCs
Marginal natural environment
Cannot lift its inhabitants out of poverty
History of stolen lands, broken treaties, and displacement to marginal land areas
Perpetuates a vicious cycle of poverty and vulnerability to environmental and climate induced harms
Illegal resource extraction #1
Oil
Timber
Diamonds
Copper
Illegal resource extraction #2
Linked to arms trafficking, paramilitary violent conflict, human rights violations and modern day slavery, humanitary disasters (famine), and environmental destruction and disaster
Illegal resource extraction #3
Beneficiaries: MDCs
Who Shoulders: LDCs and the world’s Poor
MDCs
Consumerist cultures, purchasing powers, and economic arrengements through the world market economy to consume a disproportionate share of the world’s resources
Green Imperialism
Talk of “saving the environment” by the world’s wealthy