Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Durkheim - functionalist theory
The inevitability of crime
Sees crime as inevitable
Reasons - 1. not everyone is equally effectively socialised into society’s shared norms and values 2. In modern societies there’s diversity of lifestyle and values. Groups develop their own subcultures. What they see as normal, society may see as deviant.
Positive functions of crime
Boundary maintenance - crime produces a reaction from society, uniting its members in condemning the wrongdoer and reinforcing their commitment to shared norms and values.
Adaptation and change - All change starts with an act of deviance. E.g. authorise often persecute religious visionaries.
Davis
Prostitution acts as a safety valve
Polsky
Porn channels sexual desires, prevents adultery
Cohen
Deviance helps to identity if an institution is functioning eg if truancy is high it means the school system needs to change
Merton - strain theory
The American dream
Americans are expected to pursue this by legit means. They’re told society is meritocratic and everyone has opportunities
This is false, many groups are disadvantaged. E.g poverty, poor schooling and discrimination in employment
The resulting strain produces frustration, this creates a pressure to resort to illegitimate means
Deviant adaptations to strain
Conformity - accepting approved goals and striving to achieve them legitimately
Innovation - accepting the goal but using illegitimate means
Ritualism - giving up on the goal but following the rules eg working a dead end job
Retreatism - rejecting the goals and the legit means eg addicts and tramps
Rebellion - rejecting goals and means but replacing them with new ones to bring revolutionary change eg political radical
Cohen - status frustration
Agreed with Merton that deviance is largely. Results from their inability to achieve society’s goals by legit means. However, he criticises Merton on 2 grounds:
Merton sees deviance as an individual response to strain, ignoring the fact that much deviance is committed in or by groups
Merton focuses on utilitarian crime, doesn’t explain other types
Cohen focuses on WC boys. They face anomie in MC dominated school. Suffer from CD and lack skills needed to achieve. Left at the bottom of the official status hierarchy, causing status frustration. They resolve this by turning to or making delinquent subcultures
Alternative status hierarchy
Subcultures invert the values of mainstream society. E.g. in anti-school subcultures, boys gain status from vandalising property and truanting
For Cohen, subcultures’ function is to offer the boys an alternative hierarchy in which they can achieve
This offers an explanation for non utilitarian crime
However, assumes WC boys start off with the same goals as MC boys
Piliavin and Briar (1964)
Found that police decisions to arrest a youth were mainly based on physical cues (such as manner and dress)
Cicourel - negotiation of justice
Young middle class people favoured by the justice system
Seen to have more of a future, a good kid who made a mistake
Parents more likely to be able to negotiate with control agencies