Looks like no one added any tags here yet for you.
Formed a fan base
Other members would not play a member of a competitor in the market space
New has twice the retail space. 13 restaurants and pubs compared to 4 in the old ballpark
New has 56 luxury suites and 410 party suites. Older had 19
The new stadium is 63% larger than the size of the facility it replaced even though playing fields were identical
Politicians have the ability to simply legislate a public stadium subsidy for a franchise
The potential for the award of the public subsidy can be placed up for a public vote
Local governments feel pressure to keep the franchise in their local market
Fans do not want their local team to move
Politicians do not want to be “the one in office” when the team decides to relocate
Open markets that are a “real” relocation threat
Think of the open markets in NFL, MLB, NHL and NBA
Higher property taxes
Higher standard sales taxes
Additional new taxes on specific items
Diversion of taxes from the general fund to the stadium construction fund
Creation of Social Capital
Relocate economic activity
Define the identity of the city/region
Economic development
The small increase usually has little political opposition
Even a small % increase generates a large amount of $
Impact on the individual taxpayer is very small
Real estate outside venues on adjacent land (build new neighborhoods for Padres, District in Detroit
Build new entertainment complexes on small acreage to include restaurants, pubs, live performance spaces
Located at the nexus of many transit systems
Now include amenities that are available before, during, and after games and
events
Horizontal integration of sport with entertainments options is more popular
Sport has sustained its popularity across several decades
1. Luxury seating
2. Seating deck
Normal seats/bleachers
3. Concourses and entrances
4. Scoreboard and electronic displays
5. Playing surface
6. Naming rights