'Culture' (How to Think Like an Anthropologist)- Matthew Engelke

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/20

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

21 Terms

1
New cards

What are Engelke’s three main critiques of the traditional culture concept?

  1. Culture is not bounded in place

  2. Culture is not fixed in time

  3. Culture is not coherent or unified

2
New cards

What does ‘culture is not bounded in place’ mean?

Cultures overlap, borrow, and flow through trade, migration, media, and globalisation. No culture exists in isolation.

3
New cards

Example of cultural interaction across space:

The Kula Ring in the Trobriand Islands- exchange networks connecting different groups. 

4
New cards

What does ‘culture is not fixed in time’ mean? 

Cultures change. Early anthropology often treated them as static ‘snapshots’, ignoring historical and colonial change 

5
New cards

Example of the ‘timeless native’ problem:

Victor Turner’s study of Ndembu rituals, which ignored colonial transformations around them.

6
New cards

What does ‘culture is not coherent or unified’ mean?

Cultures contain contradictions, disagreements, and inconsistencies. Not all members share identical beliefs.

7
New cards

What is essentialism in anthropology? 

The belief that a culture has an unchanging, inherent essence, often leading to stereotypes or racism. 

8
New cards

How can essentialism be politically dangerous?

It can justify inequity (e.g. apartheid in South Africa used ‘cultural difference’ as rationale for segregation)

9
New cards

What shift occurred in anthropology after the 1980s?

Many anthropologists rejected or redefined ‘culture’, focusing on power, discourse, and practice instead.

10
New cards

Which thinkers influenced this shift after the 1980s?

  • Michel Foucault- power, discourse, subjectivity 

  • Pierre Bourdieu- habitus (structured but flexible dispositions) 

  • Arjun Appadurai- globalisation and cultural flows 

  • Lila Abu-Lughod- ‘write against culture’ to avoid reification

11
New cards

What is habitus according to Bourdieu? 

‘Structured structures predisposed to function as structing structures’- learned ways of being that both reflect and shape society. 

12
New cards

How did Abu-Lughod suggest anthropologists approach culture?

Write against it- emphasising specific practices and power relations, not reified essences. W

13
New cards

What does Appadurai’s work highlight?

Culture as dynamic and global, emphasising flows, media, and imagination

14
New cards

How did US anthropology treat the culture concept? 

It remained central, especially in Boasian and interpretive traditions. e.g. Geertz. H

15
New cards

How did British anthropology differ?

It focused more on society and social structure rather than abstract ‘culture’

16
New cards

What did Firth argue about society and culture?

They overlap; neither can be fully understood without the other.

17
New cards

What did James Clifford say about culture? 

‘Culture is a deeply compromised idea I cannot yet do without’

18
New cards

How does Engelke interpret this?

We must use ‘culture’ critically, acknowledging its flaws, but recognising its value.

19
New cards

Why is culture still essential in anthropology?

It reminds us that human behaviour is historically and socially situated and prevents oversimplified universal claims. W

20
New cards

Why is culture still essential in anthropology? 

It reminds us that human behaviour is historically and socially situated and prevents oversimplified universal claims. 

21
New cards

What is the danger of discarding culture entirely?

Other disciplines (psychology, political science) risk ignoring context, and assuming uniform ‘human nature’