1/36
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan (1895)
Holding: The federal income tax on property-derived income was unconstitutional because it was a direct tax not apportioned among the states as required by the Constitution.
Precedent: Limited Congress' ability to impose direct taxes until the 16th Amendement
United States v. United States Shoe Corp (1998)
Holding: The Habor Maintenance Tax violated the Export Clause of the Constitution
Precedent: Limited Congress' ability to impose direct taxes until the 16th Amendment
South Carolina v. Baker (1988)
Holding: The federal government could tax state-issued bonds
Precedent: Overruled precedent that previously exempted state-issued bonds from federal taxes
Davis v. Michigan Department of Treasury (1989)
Holding: Michigan's tax exemption for state employee pensions but not federal employee pensions violated intergovernmental tax immunity
Precedent: Tax laws must not discriminate between state and federal employees
McCray v. United States (1904)
Holding: A federal tax on margarine was constitutional, even if designed to discourage its use
Precedent: Congress can use taxation as a regulatory tool
Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. (1922)
Holding: Struck down a federal tax on child labor as unconstitutional, deeming it a penalty not a tax
Precedent: Taxes cannot be punitive measures regulating non-tax issues
United States v. Bulter (1936)
Holding: Struck down the Agricultural Adjustment Act's processing tax, deeming it unconstitutional
Precedent: Expanded limited on federal spending powers
Steward Machine Co. v. Davis (1937)
Holding: Upheld the Social Security Act's unemployment compensation provisions
Precedent: Broad interpretation of Congress' taxing and spending powers
South Dakota v. Dole (1987)
Holding: Congress could condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age
Precedent: Established limits on conditional federal funding
N.F.I.B. v. Sebelius (2012)
Holding: The Affordable Care Act's individual mandate was upheld as a tax but Medicaid expansion provisions were partially unconstitutional
Precedent: Redefined limits on federal powers under the Commerce Clause and Spending Clause
Hylton v. United States (1796)
Holding: A carriage tax was upheld as an indirect tax under the Constitution
Precedent: Early distinction between direct and indirect taxes
Springer v. United States (1881)
Holding: Upheld federal income taxes during the Civil War as constitutional
Precedent: Validated federal taxation under exigent circumstances
Collector v. Day (1871)
Holding: Federal taxes on state judges' salaries violated intergovernmental tax immunity
Precedent: States and federal government have reciprocal tax immunities
California v. Texas (2021)
Holding: Challengers lacked standing to contest the ACA after the individual mandate penalty was reduced to zero
Precedent: Reinforced standing requirements
Brown v. Maryland (1827)
Holding: Maryland's import licensing tax violated the Commerce Clause
Precedent: Federal authority supersedes state restrictions on imports
Bellas Hess v. Illinois (1967)
Holding: States could not require out-of-state retailers to collect sales unless they had a physical presence in the state
Precedent: Established the "physical presence" rule for sales tax collection
Quill Corp. v. North Dakota (1992)
Holding: Reaffirmed Bellas Hess's physical presence rule.
Precedent: Later overruled by South Dakota v. Wayfair.
South Dakota v. Wayfair (2018)
Holding: Overturned Quill, allowing states to require online retailers without physical presence to collect tax
Precedent: Broadened state taxation power over e-commerce
Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Oregon (1994)
Holding: Oregon's surcharge on out-of-state waste disposal violated the Commerce Clause
Precedent: Prohibited discriminatory feeds against interstate commerce
Complete Auto Transit v. Brady (1977)
Holding: Upheld Mississippi's tax on interstate transportation companies, establishing a four-part test for state taxes
Precedent: Clarified standards for state taxation of interstate businesses
Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages (1976)
Holding: States could impose property taxes on imported goods in warehouses
Precedent: Reinterpreted import tax restrictions to allow non-discriminatory property taxes
Fletcher v. Peck (1810)
Holding: Struck down Georgia's law rescinding land grands as unconstitutional under the Contract Clause
Precedent: First case to declare a state law unconstitutional
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819)
Holding: New Hampshire's law altering Dartmouth's charter violated the Contract Clause
Precedent: Upheld corporate charters as private contracts
Proprietors of Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of Warren Bridge (1837)
Holding: Massachusetts did not violate the Contract Clause by allowing construction of a competing bridge
Precedent: Prioritized public good over private contracts
Stone v. Mississippi (1880)
Holding: Mississippi could revoke lottery charters, despite contracts with private companies
Precedent: Contracts cannot override public policy concerns
Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell (1934)
Holding: Minnesota's mortgage moratorium law during the Great Depression did not violate the Contract Clause
Precedent: Allowed emergency powers to limit contractual obligations
Sveen v. Melin (2018)
Holding: Retroactive application of Minnesota's law revoking spousal beneficiary designations post-divorce did not violate the Contract Clause
Precedent: Modernized Contract Clause analysis
The Slaughterhouse Cases (1873)
Holding: Limited the application of the 14th Amendment's Privileges or Immunities Clause
Precedent: Narrow interpretation of post-Civil War amendments
Munn v. Illinois (1877)
Holding: Upheld state regulation of grain elevator rates
Precedent: Allowed state regulation of private businesses affecting public interest
Allgeyer v. Louisiana (1897)
Holding: Struck down a Louisiana law restricting out-of-state insurance contracts
Precedent: Early recognition of substantive due process rights
Lochner v. New York (1905)
Holding: Struck down maximum work-hour laws as violating economic liberty under substantive due process
Precedent: "Lochner Era" of limited regulation of economic activity
Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1923)
Holding: Struck down minimum wage laws for women as unconstitutional
Precedent: Later overturned by West Coast Hotel
Nebbia v. New York (1934)
Holding: Upheld milk price controls as constitutional economic regulation
Precedent: Marked end of strict economic substantive due process
West Coast Hotel v. Parrish (1937)
Holding: Upheld minimum wage laws, overturning Adkins
Precedent: Ended the Lochner Era
Williamson v. Lee Optical Company (1955)
Holding: Upheld laws regulating optometry, differing to legislative judgement
Precedent: Marked broad deference to economic regulations
BWM of North America v. Gore (1996)
Holding: Excessive punitive damages violate due process
Precedent: Limits on punitive damages
United States v. Causby (1946)
Holding: Government overflight causing property devaluation was a compensable taking
Precedent: Redefined modern takings law