National Government Module 6

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/42

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

43 Terms

1
New cards

Jurisdiction

the right of a court to consider a particular case

2
New cards

Federal jurisdiction

encompasses cases involving the U.S. Constitution or other federal laws and cases in which the U.S. government is a party

3
New cards

Diversity jurisdiction

cases involving individuals from two different states could be tried in federal court if the stakes of the case were high enough

4
New cards

Plaintiff

the person or company who initiates the lawsuit

5
New cards

Defendant

the person or entity being sued

6
New cards

Ultimately every case in the United States is subject to the requirement that it comply with the U.S. Constitution.

True

7
New cards

Cases falling within federal diversity jurisdiction must first be heard in a state court before moving to a federal court.

False, a case that meets the requirements for diversity jurisdiction can start in either state or federal court.

8
New cards

Appellate jurisdiction

involves cases that are appealed to the Supreme Court from a lower federal court or from a state supreme court

9
New cards

Ex Parte McCardle

the Supreme Court ruled that Congress can remove the jurisdiction of the court to hear particular categories of cases

10
New cards

Original jurisdiction

cases heard initially by the Supreme Court, rather than first being heard by a lower court

11
New cards

A case in which the United States is sued by an interest group over environmental laws is an example of what kind of jurisdiction?

Appellate jurisdiction

12
New cards

A case in which the Ambassador from Costa Rica disputes a New York state divorce law is an example what kind of jurisdiction?

Original jurisdiction

13
New cards

A case in which Arizona sues California over their shared border along the Colorado river is an example of what kind of jurisdiction?

Original jurisdiction

14
New cards

A case in which federal immigration laws are challenged in an example of what kind of jurisdiction?

Appellate jurisdiction

15
New cards

Federal district courts

Courts where most cases in the federal system are heard initially

16
New cards

How many judges normally hear a case in the federal district courts?

1

17
New cards

Federal circuit courts

intermediate appellate courts in the federal system

18
New cards

A federal circuit court is the last place that almost all federal cases are heard.

True

19
New cards

Court Packing Plan

appoint new justices and replacement justices for those that did not retire soon enough

20
New cards

discretionary docket

it decides which cases it will hear

21
New cards

Rule of Four

rule made by the court itself that says if any four of the nine justices agree to hear a case than it is placed on the docket

22
New cards

How many justices need to vote to hear a case in order for it to appear on the Supreme Court's docket?

4

23
New cards

Solicitor general

member of the executive branch who is tasked with representing the interests of the federal government before the court

24
New cards

Writ of certiorari

legal order to the lower court to send up the record of the case for the Supreme Court to consider

25
New cards

amicus curiae briefs

designed to provide the court with information outside of the information provided by the parties

26
New cards

Which of the following is NOT a factor that increases the likelihood that a case will be heard on the merits by the Supreme Court?

A case involving multiple state governments.

27
New cards

oral arguments

The verbal arguments presented in person by attorneys to an appellate court. Each attorney presents reasons to the court why the court should rule in her or his client's favor.

28
New cards

conference

justices meet to see how they will vote in a certain case

29
New cards

Order from first through last in describing the process by which the Supreme Court decides a case

1. Issue writ of certiorari

2. Hear oral arguments

3. Meet in conference to discuss merits of case

4. Issue majority opinion

30
New cards

dissenting opinion

a separate opinion written by a justice and typically joined by other justices that announces their reasons for disagreeing with the outcome reached by the majority

31
New cards

concurring opinion

agrees with the outcome reached by the majority but not the reasons for reaching the conclusion

32
New cards

bork

defeat nominee by using interest groups to turn public opinion, sometimes in a way that might be considered slanderous

33
New cards

Which of the following factors is now the most important in a president's decision about who to nominate to the Supreme Court?

Ideology of nominee

34
New cards

Which of the following confirmation processes would you expect to be MOST contentious?

Supreme Court

35
New cards

policy preferences model

The way certain justices vote based on ideology (liberal vs conservative)

36
New cards

Which of the following is NOT a policy position likely to be taken by a CONSERVATIVE judge?

Pro-environmental protection

37
New cards

strategic model

builds on the policy preferences model in that it assumes the primary goal for most judges most of the time is to use their policy preferences to guide their decisions

38
New cards

Courts from least to most likely to utilize strategic decision making

1. Supreme Court

2. District Courts

3. Circuit Courts

39
New cards

legal model

the method that most people think of when they contemplate how a judge decides a case

40
New cards

Precedent

the notion that decisions in past cases that are similar to the current case should control the decision in the current case

41
New cards

Plain meaning

refers to the idea that laws need to be read carefully to understand their meaning

42
New cards

Lawmaker intent

refers to the idea that to understand what a law means we should ask what the people who wrote it understood it to mean when they wrote it

43
New cards

At which level of the federal judiciary is the application of precedent most likely to control judicial decision making?

District Court