1/39
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Corpus Delecti
body of the crime; showing crime was committed
Modus Operandi
method of operation; showing how crime was committed
physical evidence can provide…
corpus delecti
modus operandi
link between suspect and victim
link between suspect and crime scene
disprove or support witness testimony
DNA evidence proving individualization
locard’s exchange principle
when any person comes into contact with an object, cross-transfer of evidence will occur; no such thing as the perfect crime
four investigative stages
1) preliminary investigation
2) continuing investigation
3) reconstructing the crime
4) focusing the investigation (on one person)
elements of deadly force
ability (are they able to?)
opportunity (do they have the opportunity?)
imminent jeopardy (similar to immediate danger)
objective reasonableness standard
would an officer with like or similar training, faced with like or similar circumstances, react like or similar? The incident must be judged in its entirety by the facts and circumstances known to the officer at the time (totality of the circumstances)
in the officer’s shoes, when it happened in the moment, NOT from just watching it
justice
use of authority & power to uphold what is right, fair, or lawful
procedural justice
procedures used by police where citizens are treated fairly & with proper respect as human beings
assessment = +/- outcome + process
the process is more important than the outcome
practice procedural justice
voice (listen)
neutrality (fairness & consistency)
respectful treatment (the golden rule)
trustworthiness (fair & transparent process)
is non-verbal communication just as important as verbal?
yes
probable cause
standard for legal arrest and search & seizure
for an officer to make an arrest or conduct a search, must have reasonable basis to believe crime has been or is about to be committed
facts and probable cause indicators vary with each case. but must be based on officer’s knowledge at the time of arrest
arrests with & without a warrant
always best for officers to arrest with a warrant
to obtain a warrant, officer/citizen swears in an affidavit
Affidavit presented to judge
May not make warrantless entry w/o exigent circumstances
Exigent circumstances = emergency circumstances
Need to identify the emergency circumstances
Exigent circumstances DO NOT apply for misdemeanor offenses
Stopping of vehicles at sobriety checkpoints does not violate constitution
Police not required to give drunk-driving suspects Miranda warning
search & seizure with and without a warrant
4th Amend requires police to known & announce presence before entering a home
Expectations if knocking & announcing would likely endanger officers or lead to destruction of evidence
If police knock & get no response, but hear movement inside that suggests destruction of evidence, police may enter
4th Amend does not apply to foot pursuits
curtilage
area of land around a house
5th Amendment
protection against double jeopardy
no self-incrimination
the right to a fair trial
protection against taking property w/o due compensation
protection against unwarranted indictments or false arrest
miranda warnings
two legal triggers for miranda warning: custody & interrogation
must give warning before interrogation is conducted, for felony or misdemeanor
if miranda suspect invokes right to silence, interrogation must cease
after invoking right to counsel, police may not interrogate some suspect about a different crime
6th Amendment
right to speedy & public trial
right to a lawyer
right to an impartial jury
right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you
supreme court justices
9 justices
one chief justice
8 associate justices
John Roberts Jr. is 17th chief justice in the US
there have been 104 associate justices in Court’s history (located in DC)
US Supreme Court: Judges & Advocacy
9 justices, one chief justice, eight associate justices
nominated by President, confirmed by senate; serve for live
lawyers wishing to advocate a case must secure admission to supreme court bar
must apply and have been admitted to practice in highest court of their stare for at least 3 years
can pick their cases
us supreme court: administration
chief justice orders business of court and administers oath of office to president and vice president; also empowered to preside over senate if it tries to impeach the president
clerk of the court serves as chief administrative officer
marshal of the court supervises building operations
reporter of decisions oversees printing and publication
other key personnel: librarian, public information officer
voir dire
to speak the truth
trial protocals
after preliminary jury, instruction and other pretrial issues, pattern of trial process entails:
opening statements, prosecutor’s case, motion to dismiss, defense’s case, prosecution rebuttal, closing arguments, jury instruction, jury deliberations and verdict, post-trial motions, appeal
court system
adversarial
legislative makes laws
commission-based appointment
AKA merit selection; candidates considered by committee, governor makes appointment
partisan election
voters cast ballots and candidate is endorsed by a political party listed in ballot
nonpartisan election
no party designation on ballot
gubermatorial appointment
appointed by governor, may require confirmation by legislature/council
legislative appointment/election
nominated and appointed/elected by legislative vote only
3 general problems for new judges
mastering breadth of law - learned through formal and informal meetings, training, and seminars
administering the court and docket - supervising court staff
coping w/ psychological discomfort of new position - includes stress related to controlling behavior outside the courtroom
“gatekeeper” of the justice system
prosecutor
prosecutors make several decisions at their sole discretion: decision to charge; types of charges; recommend or deny bail; plea agreements; sentencing recommendations
primary role is justice to be done: also investigate crimes and represent the victims
evaluates documents to determine if they can prove act beyond a reasonable doubt
other determining factors: type of crime; prior criminal record; number of counts; aggravating or mitigating circumstances; victim’s attitude
Guiding Hand if Counsel": Defense Attorney
Try to prevent wrongful convictions; defendants have rights to counsel during all critical stages
Ineffective counsel: attorney was deficient, resulting in prejudice to the defendant and bringing outcome into question
Burden of proof is high; must show "a reasonable probability" exists that counsel's errors impacted result of proceedings; mistrial declared if this happens (saying they weren't represented properly)
"Guiding Hand of Counsel": Defense Attorney -- Indigent Services
Three systems for providing legal representation
Public defenders: government employees with sole function of representing indigent defendants
Assigned counsel system: private attorneys appointed on as-needed basis
Contract system: attorney or organization contracts with government to represent indigent defendants
Defendants may also hire best counsel available or act pro se (represent themselves)
Want to give everyone a fighting chance
do courtroom actors need to work together to move cases quickly?
yes
Interactions more likely to be cooperative than combative; work group essentially a subculture
In addition to judge, prosecutor, and defense, other participants include:
Court reporter (attends legal proceedings)
Clerk (organizes/catalogs all paperwork)
Bailiff (maintain order in courtroom)
excuse defense - age
Infancy defense: excuses acts of children aged 7 and under; too young to be criminally responsible
Minors aged 7-14 presumed incapable of committing a crime; prosecutors may challenge in certain cases
Minors under 16 typically tried in juvenile court; some states allow transfer to adult court automatically or through prosecutor request
questions from practice test
____ maintains order in the court room:
bailiff
defendants can sue prosecutors for civil damages
false
four parts of procedural justice
voice
neutrality
respect
trustworthiness
The three distinctive styles of policing
watchmen, legalistic and service
mapp vs. ohio
Mapp vs Ohio (1957) 3 Cleveland police officers went to the home of Mapp to investigate that the homeowner was hiding a recent bombing suspect engaged in an illegal gambling operation. Mapp refused the police entry w/o a search warrant. The police forcibly entered the home 3 hours later & waved a piece of paper at Mapp. She was able to grab it & put it down her shirt. Her lawyer arrived. The officers found books they deemed to be obscene and she was arrested
grand juries
○ Primary function - review evidence presented by prosecutor, determine if there is probably cause to return an indictment (formal charge)
○ All states have some form of grand jury
○ 5th Amend. requires grand jury indictment for all federal criminal charges
○ Grand juries not screened for biases or other improper functions
○ The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provide that the prosecutor, grand jurors, and the grand jury stenographer are prohibited from disclosing what happened before the grand jury
○ Prosecutor can subpoena anyone to testify
○ In federal system, witness cannot have lawyer present in grand jury room; may leave to consult
○ Double jeopardy doesn't apply to grand jury
Judge not present when testimony is being taken