OCCUPIERS' LIABILITY

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/26

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:23 AM on 4/17/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

27 Terms

1
New cards

Occupiers' Liability

Legal responsibilities for damage arising from the occupation of premises.

2
New cards

Rylands v. Fletcher

A precedent case related to nuisance and occupiers' liability.

3
New cards

Common Law

Legal principles developed through court decisions rather than statutes.

4
New cards

Contractual Entrants

Individuals who enter premises under a contract, such as hotel guests.

5
New cards

Invitees

Individuals who enter premises due to mutual interest with the occupier, such as customers.

6
New cards

Licensees

Individuals who enter with permission for personal purposes, like charity collectors.

7
New cards

Trespassers

Individuals who enter premises without permission.

8
New cards

Common Duty of Care

Occupiers must ensure that visitors are reasonably safe for their intended entry.

9
New cards

Legal Framework

The system of laws that govern the rights and responsibilities of parties.

10
New cards

Occupiers Liability Act 1957

An English statute that outlines the duties occupiers owe to visitors.

11
New cards

Independent Contractors

Workers that an occupier hires and is generally not liable for their negligence.

12
New cards

Volenti non fit injuria

A legal doctrine meaning 'to a willing person, no injury is done'.

13
New cards

B.R.R. v. Herrington

Case highlighting humane treatment obligations towards trespassers.

14
New cards

WHEAT v. E. LACONE & CO. LTD.

Case illustrating liability of landlords for unsafe premises under their control.

15
New cards

Glasgow Corp'n v. Taylor

A case setting a higher standard of care for children on premises.

16
New cards

Warnings

Notices that may or may not absolve occupiers from liability depending on clarity and effectiveness.

17
New cards

Exclusion Clauses

Provisions that limit or eliminate an occupier's liability; subject to legal constraints.

18
New cards

KIRTON v. ROGERS

A case involving liability to a trespasser injured by an electrified rail.

19
New cards

Unfair Contract Terms Act

Regulates how and when liability can be limited through exclusion clauses.

20
New cards

Harmful Conduct

Activities or conditions on premises that can cause injury to visitors.

21
New cards

Duties to Visitors

Differentiated responsibilities owed by occupiers to various classes of entrants.

22
New cards

New Zealand Ins. Co. v. Prudential Assurance Ltd.

Case determining that occupiers' liability may cover ongoing dangers on premises.

23
New cards

Revill v. Newberry

Case ruling on liability for an occupier shooting an intruder, complicating negligence adjudication.

24
New cards

Wheeler v. Corpas

Case expanding the definition of 'premises' to include movable entities.

25
New cards

Salmon v. Seafarer Restaurants Ltd.

Case relating to the expected precautions of skilled visitors.

26
New cards

Roles v. Nathan

Case addressing the adequacy of warnings to absolve occupier liability.

27
New cards

Manchester Beverages Ltd. v. Thompson

A case comparing the duties owed to trespassers and general duties of care.