1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Rutter et la studied
English and Romanian adoptees
Procedure
Researchers followed 165 Romanian orphans wth poor conditions who were adopted in the UK
Physical, cognitive and emotional development was assessed at 4,6,11,15,22-25 years
Control group of 52 children from the UK
Findings
Half the orphans showed delayed intellectual development, at age 11 recovery ates were related to age at adoption
Adopted before 6 months had a mean of 102 IQ
Adopted after two years ha a mean of 77 IQ
Frequency of disinhibited attachment
Related to age at adoption
Children adopted after 6 months old: clinginess, attention seeking and indiscriminate affecting to strangers
Rare in children adopted before 6 months
Conclusions in findings
Findings support bowlys view of a sensitive period in attachment
Failure to form an attachment before 6 months appears to have long lasting effects
Zeanah et al studied
Bucharest early intervention
Procedure
Researchers used strange situation to assess attachment in 95 Romanian children aged 12-31 months who spent most of their lives in institutional care
Compared to control group of 50 who never experienced institutional care
Findings
19% of the institutionalised group were securely attached (74% of controls)
44% of the institutionalised group had characteristics of disinhibited attachment (20% of the controls)
Effects of institutionalisation are
Disinhibited attachment
Damage to intellectual development
Disinhibited attachment
Such people tend to be equally friendly and affectionate to strangers and people they know well
This may be an adaptation to multiple caregivers
Damage to intellectual development
Institutionalised children often show signs of intellectual disability
This effect is not pronounced if children are adopted before 6 months
One strength is real world application
Results from this research have led o movements in way children are cared for in institutions
Children's homes now avoid large numbers of caregivers for each child, one or two key workers
This means children have a chance to develop normal attachments and disinhibited attachment is avoided
Another strength is fewer confounding variables
There were many orphan studies before the Romanian orphan became available to study
These often involved children who experienced loss or trauma before they were institutionalised
Neglect, abuse and bereavement meant it was hard to observe effects of institutionalisation in isolation
Differences in institutionally cared for children are the result of this type of care
One limitation is lack of data in adult development
It is too soon to say whether children suffered permanent effects because we only have data on their development as far as early 20s
Romanian orphan studies have not yet yeilded their most important findings some children may 'catch up'