Federal Rules of Evidence

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
GameKnowt Play
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/7

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

8 Terms

1
New cards

Rule 103 Preserving a Claim of Error

A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if:

  • The substantial right of a party has to be effected

  • timely objections or motions to strike; and

  • states the specific ground

If the ruling excludes evidence

  • substantive right

  • offer of proof

2
New cards

Rule 105 Limiting Evidence

If the court admits evidence that is admissible against a party or for a purpose — but not against another party or for another purpose — the court, on timely request, must restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.

3
New cards

Rule 402 General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence

Relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise:

  • the United States Constitution;

  • a federal statute;

  • these rules; or

  • other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court.

Irrelevant evidence is not admissible

4
New cards

Rule 403 Prejudice, Confusion, or Waste of Time

The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.

5
New cards

Rule 407 Subsequent Remedial Measures

When measures are taken that would have made an earlier injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove:

  • negligence;

  • culpable conduct;

  • a defect in a product or its design; or

  • a need for a warning or instruction.

But the court may admit this evidence for:

  • impeachment

Or if disputed:

  • proving ownership

  • proving control

  • proving the feasibility of precautionary measures

6
New cards

Rule 408 Settlements & Offers

Evidence of the following is not admissible — on behalf of any party — either to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim or to impeach by a prior inconsistent statement or a contradiction:

  • furnishing, promising, or offering, accepting, promising to accept, or offering to accept, a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise the claim; and

  • conduct or a statement made during compromise negotiations about the claim — except when offered in a criminal case and when the negotiations related to a claim by a public office in the exercise of its regulatory, investigative, or enforcement authority

Exceptions:

The court may admit this evidence for another purpose, such as proving a witness’s bias or prejudice, negating a contention of undue delay, or proving an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution.

7
New cards

Rule 409 Offers to Pay Medical and Similar Expenses

Evidence of furnishing, promising to pay, or offering to pay medical, hospital, or similar expenses resulting from an injury is not admissible to prove liability for the injury.

8
New cards

Rule 410 Criminal Plea Bargaining

Prohibited Uses. In a civil or criminal case, evidence of the following is not admissible against the defendant who made the plea or participated in the plea discussions:

  • a guilty plea that was later withdrawn;

  • a nolo contendere plea;

  • a statement made during a proceeding on either of those pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 or a comparable state procedure; or

  • a statement made during plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority if the discussions did not result in a guilty plea or they resulted in a later-withdrawn guilty plea.

Exceptions:

  • in any proceeding in which another statement made during the same plea or plea discussions has been introduced, if in fairness the statements ought to be considered together; or

  • in a criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement, if the defendant made the statement