Week 2 - Crime Prevention in the Age of Responsibilization

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/3

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:35 AM on 9/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

4 Terms

1
New cards

History of the Preventive State

19th Century → prevention as an aspect of policing


1980s → shift from the welfare state to neoliberal policy

  • Reduction of social services, faith in corporations to sustain the economy

  • Privitzation

  • Individual is responsible for their risk


1990s, 2000s → attention to the scientization of risk

  • Tertiary prevention - reduction of recidivism from “risky groups”

  • Risk is now something that can be calculated


2001 (9/11) → Terrorist attacks result in the perpetuation of fear and citizen involvement

  • Dangerousness is perception (e.x. muslims as “high-risk”

  • Ordinary people help fight terrorism


Results in the preventive state and responsibilization

2
New cards

Preventive State

The various state laws/policies and practices that aim to minimize risk and provide security

  • Policy is backed by proactive uncertainty and possible prejudice

    • Specifically targets the marginalized

  • e.x. police checks, mandatory minimums


Fighting an “unknown but known risk”

  • Secondary targeting of at-risk groups is abused via tertiary methods to prevent recidivism


3
New cards

Responsibilization

The responsibility of crime prevention / social control is passed to non-state actors such as individuals or private businesses

  • “Self governance” and empowerment to help report/prevent crime


State’s expansion of influence by influencing non-state actors to help crime control through their own conduct

  • e.x. Installing security actions, call to self-governance


“Depoliticizing” → everyone has a responsibility to protect one another


4
New cards

Government At a Distance

State retains means of crime / social control through collaboration with NGO’s, communities, citizens, as well as the private security market

  • Boundaries between state, civil society, and private sector are blurred


Formal crime control techniques are still undergoing, but through responsibilization the state reaches non-governmental actors who engage in crime prevention and social control.


e.x. Insurance, private security