1/48
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Causes for Catholic survival in regions
Difficult to enforce in regions
Tolerance of gov
Commitment
jesuit priests
recusancy
Catholic nobility
Examples of E1/Ed’s tolerance
E1 settlement
Not punishing/persecuting Catholics (like M)
Not further reforms to church
Limited repression of Catholic protests/rebellions
Examples of Catholicism declining in E1’s regin
Harsher policies due to plots
Number of recusants increased because authorities kept closer eye on records
Jesuit priests not wholly effective
Actively practicing Catholics were minority by end of E1’s reign
How many active Catholics by 1603
50,000 out of population of 4 million
Significant causes for gov’s increasingly hardline approach to recusants
Arrival of MQOS 1568
E1 excommunicated 1570
Ridolfi Plot 1572
Throckmorton Plot 1583
Babington Plot 1586
Significance of E1 excommunication
1571 Oath of Supremacy by all members of Parliament
Treasons Act - treason to write E1 not lawfully Queen
ridolfi plot
involved foreign powers
Duke of Norfolk executed 1572
E1 suspended Parliament until 1576 for attempt to pass an Act banning MQOS from succession
Treason to bring bull into country
1581 stricter rules on recusants (increased fine) (stronger treason Act)
throckmorton plot
Bond of Association 1584 - death to anyone harm E1
Parliament 1584-85 tighten controls on Catholic priests
Act against Catholic priessts ordered to leave country in 40 days or executed
babington plot
E1 signed M’s death warrant
Lancashire recusancy (and increase)
1578 - 304 recusants
3,516 by 1603
Yorkshire recusants
1582 - 750 recusants
Congregation preferring communion in one kind
Berkshire 1584
Significance of Jesuit priests
Committed
Organised
Encouraged recusancy
From when did jesuit priests arrive in England
1574
Example of committed Jesuit
Cuthbert Mayne executed 1577
Training of Jesuits
William Allen
In Netherlands seminary
From 1568
Who transformed recusancy in England into organised
John Bossy
Limits of Jesuit priests
E1 Acts to prevent
Stayed around Dover and Rye ports
Only 1/5 of priests in North where 40% of known recusants lived
1580s ½ of priests in London/Essex/Thames Valley where only 1/5 of recusants lived
Significance of Catholic nobility
Involved in plots
Aided Jesuits
Catholics in yorkshire stats
1560s 75% of leading families in Yorkshire = Catholic
Purtian challenges to the settlement
1563 Convocation
Debate on vestments 1564-66
Printing
Leaders
Parliament
Prophesyings 1570s
Features of convocation
29th article
6 more radical articles
Limits of Puritan challenge through convocation
6 articles suppressed
Gov made it harder for Puritans to sit on Convocation
Debate on vestments
Injunctions highlighted what they should wear
Parker’s orders to uphold failed
Parker’s Advertisements 1566 ordered all to wear appropriate vestments
How many clergy members were ordered to turn up to Lambeth with correct vestments and how many refused
110 - 37 refused
Parliament challenges by Purtians
Alphabetical bills 1571
Bill and Book 1584
(mostly fell away by 1587)
Alphabetical bills and limit
Moderate puritan bishops wanted to improve clerical standards by attacking abuses e.g. pluralism
Strickland attempted to add own book of common prayer to the bill (E1 rejected) (but did allow 29th article)
Bill and book and limit
introduce national presbyterian church and replace E1 book of prayer
E1 sent those responsible to tower
key leaders of puritan movement
Rob Dudley
Edmund Grindal
thomas Cartwright
John Field
Thomas Cartwright significance
1570 Lecture at Cambridge supporting Calvinism
lost his post
supported by Rob Dudley who made him master of Lord Leicester hospital 1585
John Field 1st book
1572 ‘Admonitions to Parliament’ attacking bishops
John Field 2nd book
‘A view on the popish abuses yet remaining in the English Church’ - criticised book of common prayer
What did John Field encourage
1580s ‘class systems’
informal meetings of representatives from local congregations who often used for study and prayer by clergy
What were prophesyings
1570s
Emphasis on sermons and Bible reading led to informal meetings to improve quality of preaching
Clergy would preach - others would give feedback
SUpported by Grindal
Limits of prophesyings
E1 wanted them stopped as couldn’t control what was said
E.g. Southam held without Bishop’s knowledge
1576 demanded Grindal to stop and suspended him for refusing
Significance of printing
Cheap - could buy Protestant catechism if couldn’t afford the Bible
1560 Bible = 130 editions
Protestant propaganda linked to national pride
Limits of printing
Martin Marprelate Tracts 1588-89 damaged Puritan movement as attacked Anglican church just after Armada
Significance of E1 response to challenge
Harsh punishment
E1’s attitude (unwilling to allow changes)
Support of gov/nobility
Support of archbishops
Limits to E1’s response
Needed their support against Catholics 1560s
E.g. made 39 articles law in 1571
Couldn’t control in regions/local preachers
Grindal
How Parker challenged puritans
Advertisements 1566
Convocation
Require licenses to preach - all clergy had to subscribe completely to 39 articles before allowed to preach e.g. John Field suspended after wouldn’t uphold
How Whitgift challenged Puritans
1583 3 articles
All clergyman support Royal supremacy, Book of Common prayer and 39 articles (and that none against word of God)
Ex Officio oath
All clergy have to take
How many in diocese of Canterbury refused to take Ex Officio oath
300 (suspended)
Limit of Whitgift’s attempt to enforce the 3 articles
Gentry from south sent him protests/petitions
Examples of nobility challenging puritanism
Earl of Leicester tried to aid Southam
Members of Council e.g. Hatton discouraged debate on religious matters in Parliament
Examples of nobility aiding Puritanism
Emmanuel College Cambridge founded by member of council Sir Mildmay to train Purtian ministers
Walsingham
Earl of Leicester still protected Puritans, just calmed Southam down
Reasons development of puritanism was significant
Methods (convocation, parliament, prophesyings)
Puritans had support
Ideas attractive in the south
E1 unable to control grassroots
Printing press spread
Limits of significance of development of Puritanism
Failed to change E1’s settlement and harsh punishments
Not united movement
Minority overall and limits of printing press
Examples of southern puritanism
Gentry in Suffolk, Norfolk, Essex and Northhampton = purtian approach
Different approaches to challenging the settlement
Work within structure - adiaphora (some religious practices not necessary for salvation but no harm in participating anyway)
Others rejected
Others change