Phonology 1

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/46

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

47 Terms

1
New cards

sonority scale

from highest to lowest: V G L N O

feature values that divide each member:

V: +syllabic

G: -consonantal -syllabic

L: +consonantal +aproximant

N: -approximant +sonorant

O: -sonorant

feature values per each member:

V: +syll, -cons, +approx, +son

G: -syll, -cons, +approx, +son

L: -syll, +cons, +approx, +son

N: -syll, +cons, -approx, +son

O: -syll, +cons, -approx, -son

2
New cards

phonological processes

assimilation: _ -> palatalized...etc / _

deletion: _ -> null

insertion: null -> _

3
New cards

phonology in allomorphy

relates to how words can be made up of sounds that distinguish the meaning, and how different sounds can create different meanings in words

4
New cards

process of solving morphophonology problems

1. identify morphological structure

2. identify alternation

3. create hypotheses

4. figure out which hypothesis is correct, write a rule

5. name the rule

6. figure out URs

7. derivation chart

5
New cards

Chomsky's hierarchy of levels of adequacy

observational: accounts for all known data, limited to what is given in the data set (which segments occur in which environments)

descriptive: corresponds to a native speakers' knowledge; captures a psychological generalization (voiceless -> voiced / palatals)

explanatory: explains speakers competence at an underlying level, considers universal language grammar conditions (asks WHY the alternations happen using morphophonology)

6
New cards

vowel chart

knowt flashcard image
7
New cards

IPA chart

MoA:

plosives: Put Back The Dishes Keep Going Glottal

nasal stops: Me No Ng

fricatives: Fav Version Says Zing x Hi +special characters

affricates: Cha Ja

approximants: Wa La Ra Ja

flaps: flap

PoA:

bilabial: BiPaMial

labiodental: FaViodental

labiovelar: Wabialvelar

alveolar: ToDay Not Saying ZiLChaJa, Ratatata (all six special characters

palatal: palaJal

velar: KeGNyarXY

glottal: h, glottal

<p>MoA:</p><p>plosives: Put Back The Dishes Keep Going Glottal</p><p>nasal stops: Me No Ng</p><p>fricatives: Fav Version Says Zing x Hi +special characters</p><p>affricates: Cha Ja</p><p>approximants: Wa La Ra Ja</p><p>flaps: flap</p><p>PoA:</p><p>bilabial: BiPaMial</p><p>labiodental: FaViodental</p><p>labiovelar: Wabialvelar</p><p>alveolar: ToDay Not Saying ZiLChaJa, Ratatata (all six special characters</p><p>palatal: palaJal</p><p>velar: KeGNyarXY</p><p>glottal: h, glottal</p>
8
New cards

features

determine which contrasts are possible in a language, and which set of phonemes are possible.

distinctive features distinguish a group of phonemes in a language from the others in its inventory, redundant features do not.

9
New cards

contrast in phonology

differences in sounds that change how that sound is perceived

10
New cards

similarity

allophones are similar to phonemes, closest sound in a language is used in loanwords, rhyming words are very similar. these segments share phonetic features are are often found as variants of the same underlying phoneme

11
New cards

neutralization

if phonemes share an allophone in the same environment, the contrast is not used to differentiate meaning

12
New cards

cross-linguistic syllabification process

division of words into syllables, most languages prefer maximizing the onset and avoiding codas, assigning syllables from left to right.

1: transcribe into IPA

2: identify nuclei

3: attach segments to the left as onsets (maximum onset principle)

4: any segments left are attached as codas

13
New cards

sonority sequencing principle

sounds preceding the nucleus (i.e. onsets) must rise in sonority, and sounds following the nucleus (i.e. codas) must fall in sonority

14
New cards

syllable contact law

cross-linguistically, syllable boundaries that cause a sonority decrease from coda to onset are preferred

15
New cards

syllable weight

heavy (H) vs. light (L), onset does not contribute to weight, it is only the content of the rhyme.

CV = light

CVV = heavy

CVC = heavy

16
New cards

rhyme

rhyme is a gradient scale, going from perfect rhyme, imperfect rhyme, and non-rhyme. there are two types of imperfect rhyme:

subsequence rhyme: segments in one corresponding string are a subset of the segments in the other string. (ex. sALt vs. ALl). we use an X to denote subsequence rhyme, so the notation for this example would be: [Xt]-[Xl]. slant, imperfect, and half rhyme are all synonyms of this type.

feature rhyme: some corresponding segments differ in feature values (ex. jʌŋ vs. ɹʌn where the ŋ and n differ slightly in features)

17
New cards

meter

rhythmic structure of lines of poetry, measured in feet. heavy and light syllables or stressed and unstressed syllables are marked with macron and breve symbols.

18
New cards

stress and phonetic cues

in english, stress cues include higher pitch, longer and louder vowels, presence of full set of vowels, and voiceless plosives becoming aspirated.

phonemic stress: contrastive, stress is used to distinguish words (ex. record and record)

phonologic stress: non-contrastive, can write rules because stress is governed by phonological rules

stress languages are culminative, and have one primary stress per word, but can have multiple unstressed or secondary stressed syllables.

19
New cards

mora and prosodic hierarchy

mora essentially represent duration, and it is something in which a long syllable consists of two and a short syllable consists of one. from top to bottom, the hierarchy reads:

prosodic word

foot

syllable

mora

20
New cards

tone systems

tone languages use pitch to distinguish words, and each syllable corresponds to a pitch. pitch is relative, controlled by a frequency of vocal chord vibration.

simple tone system: 2 tones (H L) or 3 tones (H M L)

complex tone system: includes level tones (H M L) and contour tones (rising and falling)

TBUs are assigned one-to-one, left to right

21
New cards

well-formedness convention

three principles that must be followed for the association of a TBU to be proper:

every tone must match with at least one TBU

every time we have a TBU, it must be associated with a tone

association lines may not cross

22
New cards

tone processes

twin sister convention: identical adjacent tones associated to one TBU are automatically simplified to a single tone

tone preservation: when we delete a vowel, this does not result in the deletion of the associated tone

tone shifting: tone is delinked and then associated to the next TBU

tone spreading: tone associated to an additional TBU

delinking: the association line between a tone and a TBU is severed

solid lines show the tone existing at the time of the process, dotted lines show the result of the process and the new things that are occurring, and removed association lines are marked with = or x.

23
New cards

approaches to high and low tones

H tones are treated as underlying, however there are two approaches to analyzing L tones:

L is also underlying

or, L is inserted at the end of the derivation. any TBU that doesn't have an associated tone receives an L tone after all rules are applied

for the second approach, you must state at the end of the derivation chart "default L association," which can be iterative.

24
New cards

obligatory contour principle (OCP)

prohibition against 2 identical adjacent tones in a morpheme's UR. this is caused by the same rule governing stress clashes as it makes the tone less prominent and identifiable.

25
New cards

linear and non-linear phonology

linear: features exist on one line

non-linear: tone, stress, timing, and segmental features all have separate tiers

26
New cards

feature geometry

theory that features exist in a structured hierarchy on autosegmental tiers (rather than as a bundle)

this only includes features in their + values, and they are used as instructions to articulators to perform tasks

there are features tied to a particular articulator, and stricture features

<p>theory that features exist in a structured hierarchy on autosegmental tiers (rather than as a bundle)</p><p>this only includes features in their + values, and they are used as instructions to articulators to perform tasks</p><p>there are features tied to a particular articulator, and stricture features</p>
27
New cards

bottlebrush model

every feature is connected to the timing tier, but independently branches off. place features seem to be connected to each other, and this theory does not account for both this and the fact that nasal place assimilation exists.

28
New cards

rule based analysis

focuses on getting from an input to an output, rewriting derivations from one sequence to another

main skepticalities are what constrains the possible rules, and if unnatural rules are possible, and also the connection between two rules that describe the same target are not always specified.

29
New cards

optimality theory (OT)

linguistic model that proposes language forms are created through satisfying viable constraints as opposed to rules.

viable constraints are interacting principles that match the typology of the given language

the change from input to output is a competition between processes

30
New cards

OT model

lexicon: contains the URs of morphemes

CON: constraint set; set of universal constraints

GEN: generator; takes a word's UR as input and produces an infinite set of outcomes

EVAL: evaluator; evaluates each potential output using the language-specific constraints and determines winners

31
New cards

constructing tableaux

the first constraint listed will be whichever is the most dominant

-fatal candidates are marked with !

-candidates that win are marked with the wingding hand

-candidates that "win" but do not produce the correct surface form are marked with a bomb

if there are two predicted winners, another constraint is needed

32
New cards

faithfulness constraints

match the input and want things to stay the same, penalizes changes such as

-insertion

-deletion

-changes to feature values

-changes in order of segments

-assimilation

33
New cards

MAX-IO

maximality from input -> output, penalizes deletion

"assign a violation for each segment in the input that does not have a correspondence in the output"

34
New cards

DEP-IO

dependence from input -> output, penalizes insertion

"assign a violation for each segment in the output that does not have a correspondence in the input"

35
New cards

IDENT-IO(feature)

"assign a violation for any segment in the output that does not have identical values for the specified feature in the input"

36
New cards

markedness constraints

penalize marked output configurations; don't have to match the input but consider universal qualities considered "rule violations"

-rare vs. common universal language traits

-harder vs. easier articulation

-harder vs. easier to perceive

syllabification relies on markedness constraints as it is not included in the URs of morphemes

37
New cards

ONSET

*[sigmaV

"assign a violation for each syllable that has an onset"

38
New cards

NOCODA

*C]sigma

"assign a violation for each syllable with a coda"

39
New cards

*COMPLEX-ONSET

*[sigmaCC

"assign a violation for each syllable that has two or more segments in its onset"

40
New cards

*COMPLEX-CODA

*CCsigma]

"assign a violation for each syllable that has two or more segments in its coda"

41
New cards

*VOICEDCODA

"assign a violation for each voiced obstruent in coda position"

42
New cards

INTER-V-VOICE

"assign a violation for each intervocalic consonant that is not voiced"

(intervocalic = occurring between two vowels)

43
New cards

*VNASAL

"assign a violation for any vowel that is nasal"

44
New cards

*VORALN

"assign a violation for any oral vowel occurring before a tautosyllabic nasal"

(tautosyllabic = in the same syllable)

45
New cards

open vs. closed syllables

open syllables do not include codas, whereas closed syllables do

46
New cards

proposing constraints

every constraint must be proposed in a pair, and must be universal. each constraint should have a definition stating how to assign a violation.

you should also produce descriptive generalizations based on the data, but be sure they are NOT language specific and keep universal typology in mind.

47
New cards

factorial typologies

if we have 3 constraints, 3! = 6, and therefore we should find 6 possible rankings to predict the language's behavior

all constraints should be universal, and therefore this example would predict every language in the world would have one of these 6 possible rankings.

in other words, the number of constraints in its factorial form makes up the number of possible rankings.