1/21
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Bay of Pigs (1961)
batista is overthrown in ‘59 in cuba by revolutionaries under castro
eisenhower gives okay on plot to overthrow
brigate 2506
US territory used to plan military operation against sovereign state without declaration of war
lodgement for uprising and revolt against in military against communists
protected by preemptive strike of B-26 in Guatemala
Bay of Pigs: Bureaucraticus
untested assumptions, poor management
bissel and dulles’ deep plan (CIA)
insertion of Brigade 2507 followed by US invasion according to plan
not a sufficient amount of B-26 pilots
marines on the USS Essex
likely to fail, too many secrets hadn’t been unraveled
Bay of Pigs: Sociologicus
hasty rush to consensus
many decision making mistakes
idea that congress would believe it’s a cuban operation
assuming US air superiority
1400 US v. 30K Cubans
bad morale
Bay of Pigs: Sociologicus Errors
belief of US invulnerability/ superiority
illusion of inaminity
suppress personal doubts
self-appointed mind-guards
may not understand facts but do understand emotions
docility fostered by Suave Leadership
hard to argue against kennedy
taboo of antagonizing new members
Bay of Pigs: Psychologicus
cognitive consistency was limited
no backup plan
defensive avoidance: avoiding arguments
wishful thinking
analogical reasoning: comparing and assuming it will be fine based off of comparisons
Cuban Missile Crisis: Psychologicus
cognitive consistency
analogical reasoning to bay of pis
prospect theory
emotional processes, pushing to extreme
Escalating Vietnam
kennedy’s special forces war
Tonkin Gulf: limitless campaign in VN
gradual escalation
tet offensive
Escalating Vietnam: bureaucraticus
organizational struggle
bureaucratic detachment: one part of US government was dis-interested in other branch’s struggles
Clifford and McNamara: argument over direction of the war
opponents were juniors except for George Ball
Escalating Vietnam: Sociologicus
stress on cohesiveness → Johnson’s very agreeable group
commitment to prior decisions
conformity
unanimity
overlooking risks
Escalating Vietnam: Psychologicus
value of analogies
define nature of reasoning
stakes involved → domino effect
prescriptions and solutions didn’t stick
success prediction lacked
no question of morality
warnings were ignored by Kennedy
analogical reasoning
Iran Hostage Crisis (1979)
westernization in iran
seizure of US embassy
Carter’s Try and See approach
hostage release in 81
Iran Hostage Crisis: bureaucraticus
where you stand…
capabilities and frustrations of Dept of Defense → no proper training
political barometer was failing for President Carter → election year
Iran Hostage Crisis: Sociologicus
vigilant decision making v. groupthink
groupthink wins
Cyprus Vance’s concern that it was mostly focused on Carter’s political future
Mindguard Stansfield Turner supresses a CIA study
Iran Hostage Crisis: Psychologicus
personality (Khomeini v. Carter)
ego defensive traits of Carter
overplaying “narcissistic, expansionist” personality structure
poliheuristic and prospect theory
analogical reasoning: Entebbe, Uganda, etc.
Kosovo (1999)
Milosevic’s Greater Serbia speech
nationalism, dominating Serbia
Balkan Ghosts, reprised
Serb and Bosniac struggle
US intervenes for Bosniacs
Albania = republic now
Albanian Ponzi scheme collapse
built fortifications around the country
rioting, stormed into armeries
rise of Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA)
Serb crackdown on KLA → humanitarian crisis
Kosovo: bureaucraticus
tough time for Clinton → Monica Lewinsky
Wesley Clark’s fateful truth telling
embarrassment over Clinton’s past failures
Kosovo: sociologicus
groupthink as a result from Racak Massacres
decreased albanians
mitigated against reconciliation with Serbs of Milosevic
enough targets to hurt serbs
Kosovo: psychologicus
classic misconception issues
Milosevic thought US wouldn’t/ couldn’t bomb
US thought Milosevic would back down
Ostensible reasons for Iraq invasion
Setting off a “big bang”
pro-democratic chain in the area
protect US allies and homeland
punish Saddam Hussein for alleged 9/11 involvement
Invading Iraq: bureaucraticus
state of Dept. v. Defense
Battle over OHRA (office of reconstruction and humanitarian assistance)
neoconservatives who wanted war v. the rest who argued against it
charges of Richard Clarke and Paul O’Neil
Invading Iraq: sociologicus
less convincing
mindguards
Galbraith’s rage
Praetorian Guard
Invading Iraq: psychologicus
impulse DM
drunkard’s search: image indicating easiest option > correct option
misperception-induced failure to empathize
fundamental attribution error
Hussein looking at Iran with fear
Iraq pretends to have nuclear weapons to deter Iran
analogical reasoning
inability to process psychologically inconvenient info