1/140
Vocabulary practice flashcards covering foundational concepts, theories, gender differences, and attraction based on intro to intimate relationships lecture material.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Interdependence
The mutual influence people have over each other which is bidirectional, extended over time, and extended across situations.
Selection effects
The concept that happy people are more likely to get married than stay single, and less happy people are more likely to divorce.
Protection effects
The idea that marriage itself provides benefits such as improved physical health, financial status, and sexual frequency.
Passion
A component of love involving an intense emotional response and often sexual desire.
Intimacy
A component of love characterized by warmth, closeness, and sharing.
Commitment
The decision to maintain a relationship over time.
Romantic love
A form of love characterized by high passion and intimacy but lacking commitment, often seen in short-term flings.
Companionate love
A type of love seen in long-term couples where there is strong friendship and commitment, but passion and sex are no longer present.
Hindsight bias
The tendency for research findings to seem obvious after they have been reported.
Operationalization
The process of defining abstract concepts in a specific way that allows them to be measured and observed.
Sentiment override
When a partner's global feelings about the relationship color their perceptions of specific behaviors and experiences.
Attrition bias
A problem in longitudinal research where specific types of participants, such as low-trust couples, are more likely to drop out, leaving biased data.
Natural selection
The process by which features contributing to survival and successful reproduction are passed down to future generations.
Sexual selection
The evolution of features that help an organism compete for or attract mates.
Theory of parental investment
The idea that men and women evolved different preferences based on the amount of energy and resources required to raise healthy offspring.
Internal working model
A mental representation of the self as worthy of love (model of self) and others as reliable (model of others).
Preoccupied type
An attachment style characterized by obsession with relationships, clinginess, and dramatic fluctuations in emotional states.
Dismissing type
An attachment style where individuals are uncomfortable with closeness, resist intimacy, and are not supportive when partners are distressed.
Fearful type
An attachment style combining anxiety and avoidance, where individuals long for relationships but withdrawal due to fear of being hurt.
Social Exchange Theory - Outcome
Outcome=Rewards−Costs
Comparison level (CL)
The expectations or standards against which relationship outcomes are compared to determine satisfaction (Satisfaction=Outcome−CL).
Comparison level for alternatives (CLalt)
Perceptions of alternatives to the current relationship, which determines dependency or independence (Dependency=Outcome−CLalt).
Coercion theory
A social learning concept where partners inadvertently reinforce negative behaviors by giving in only when the behavior becomes intense.
Negative reciprocity
A pattern where one person responds to their partner's negative behavior with a negative behavior of their own.
ABC-X Model
A social ecological model where A is the stressor, B is resources, C is the perception of the stressor, and X is the crisis.
Stress pile-up
The buildup of multiple stressors resulting from an initial stressful event.
Sex
Biological status dictated by chromosomes, hormones, and anatomy.
Gender
The social presentation of sex influenced by culture.
d-statistic
A standardized way of quantifying differences between groups; a value of 0 means no difference.
Intrasexual competition
The competition between members of the same sex to make themselves more attractive to potential mates.
Social structural theory
Explains gender differences as a result of the division of labor, physical specializations, and social constructions of gender.
Androgyny
A sex role identity high in both masculine and feminine traits, associated with higher self-esteem and more secure relationships.
Agency
A sex role focus on self and separation, often associated with domineering or cold behavior.
Communion
A sex role focus on connection to others, which can lead to neediness or a lack of self-worth if not balanced.
Sexual fluidity
Shifts in sexuality at different points in life, which occurs more often in women than in men.
Asexuality
A distinct sexual orientation characterized by a lack of sexual desire and attraction.
Big 5 dimensions
Clusters of traits including Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Negative Affectivity, Openness to experience, and Extraversion; they are approximately 50% heritable.
Negative affectivity
A personality trait involving anxiety, hostility, and self-consciousness that predicts relationship dissatisfaction and divorce.
Dependence Regulation Model
A model showing how low self-esteem leads individuals to underestimate a partner's feelings, causing them to devalue the partner and feel unsatisfied.
Felt security
A child's experience of safety from a caregiver, or an adult's confidence in a partner's affection and commitment.
Matching phenomenon
The tendency for people to pair up with partners who are similar in physical appearance.
Mere exposure effect
The tendency for liking to increase after repeated interaction or exposure to a stimulus.
Actor effect
The tendency for a specific individual to desire others.
Partner effect
The tendency for a specific individual to be desired by others based on traits like attractiveness or extraversion.
Relationship effect
The desire for a specific partner, often referred to as "chemistry."
Proceptivity
Nonverbal signals shown by one person to another indicating that an approach would be acceptable.
Intimate relationships matter because they are the only setting in which feelings and experiences like these occur
To love and to be loved are the most basic of human needs - few punishments are more costly than loneliness and social isolation
Sharing life’s stresses and strains with trusted confidant is best way to shield ourselves against depressions
Relationships fundamental to our emotional lives - soothed by even smallest gesture from loved one
Brain regions governing responses to emotional and behavioral threat were activated less when holding a partner’s hand than when holding either no hand or a stranger’s hand
Biologically attuned to people with whom we share an intimate bond
Human capacity for intimacy enables us to regulate our emotions and emotions of people close to us - adapt to the world we live in
Subjective well-being - how happy we are with life in general, relationships affects this
Relationship status - independent of relationship quality, the type of relationship and individual is currently experiencing
Those in relationships report greater well-being than those who are single, due to less societal discrimination while receiving more social support from friends and relatives
Married people report greater happiness - those living with a partner are happier than those living alone
Relationship quality - how good or bad people judge their relationship to be - affects their overall subjective well-being
The quality of intimate relationships indicates more about a person's overall satisfaction than any other domain in their life (work, finances, friendships, etc.)
Just because relationship is happy right now does not mean the relationship is consistently fulfilling - enduring relationship of high quality leads to happier people
Intimate relationships promote happiness because of the beneficial effects they exert on our physical health (people who resolve relationships conflicts are less vulnerable to catching common cold, their bodies heal more quickly)
People live in committed relationships live longer compared to those in unstable relationships - greater levels of stress exposure promote inflammation while slowing down cell division - those whole have high degree of closeness with spouse more likely to view stressors as shared rather than individual which reduces impact of stressor
People in 60s - self-reported levels of criticism from pattern found to predict likelihood of death over next five years
Close relationships promote happiness through sexual intimacy - people report being happiest when engaging in sex and physical intimacy
People with steady partner have more sex than those who are not partnered
Relationships have surprising effects on financial well-being - value of married is $100,000 a year, relative to being separated or widowed - those who remain married carry more wealth throughout adulthood
People tend to pay a price for relationship transitions especially when partnership end
People who are happier and healthier are more likely to marry than stay single, and those happier pre marriage are less likely to divorce
Selection effects - happiness is said to “select” people into certain sorts of relationships, and it is the initial happiness that makes for the better relationship, not the reverse
Protection effects - captures the idea that something real about being in a committed relationship does provide some measure of protections that is not available to single or cohabitating individuals
Infant’s profound vulnerability and dependence, the developing child might be affected by the intimate relationships of their caregivers
Relationship status of parents more influential than race and education in determining whether children will experience poverty
Children feel more upset and less emotionally secure when their parents argue, leading them to act out and display aggression with their peers
Arguing parents affects biological systems in children, reducing quality of sleep, speeding up onset of puberty, and compromising their physical health
Marital conflict in home disrupts adolescents attachment to their caregivers, disrupts relationship with peers, and increases addictive online behavior
Children exposed to more parental disruptions tend to have more behavioral problems and poorer health, risk for obesity grows as they anticipate and experience parental separation
How well child fares closely related to quality of parents’ relationship before breaking up than to the split itself
Families that children grow up in influence the way they manage their own intimate relationships
Children of identical twins to examine effects of parental divorce on children’s emotional difficulties and tendencies to later divorce - effects of genes shared by parents and offspring, parental divorce really does increase the likelihood of emotional difficulties and divorce tendencies
Having a divorced parents increases one's chance of divorce by about 10-20%, but most children with divorced parents can go on to have relationships that are indistinguishable from those of children who have intact parents
Are intimate relationships truly private?
Relationship issues are present in 38% of all mass murders
Classmates of child exposed to domestic violence go on to have lower reading and math scores, reducing classmates’ future earnings years later
Every divorce costs taxpayers about $30,000 in the form of welfare payments, childcare, food stamps, and similar expenses
Social control theory - social relationship impose limits on how individuals behave, with weaker relationships increasing deviant behavior
Regulatory effect occurs because relationships encourage people to internalise and abide by social norms, due to the personal costs that can result when these norms are violated
If a convicted criminal forms a stable relationship, they are less likely to commit crimes in the future, unless partner also has a criminal record
Cocaine use drops as people enter committed relationships and increases when committed relationships are dissolved
Intimate relationships are a universal experience
Pairbonds - connection between two people who have some degree of emotional investment, usually for purpose of reproducing
Hardwired capacity for intimacy does not mean this capacity is the same for all people within a culture, or for all cultures at a specific time or for all people across historical time
Experience of love differs across cultures
Differences between individualistic or collectivist societies can be seen how people choose their mates
Individualistic, family is support system, person falls in love, introduces mate to family, and pursue relationships
Collectivist, individuals are the support system for families - families collaborate to find partners for their offspring, not to promote happiness but to enhance the family’s stability or social standing
Women who choose who they marry are more satisfied in their relationship - love marriages more satisfying than arranged marriages
Westernized values in marriage are changing - instead of obligations more to form fulfillment and individual growth, demands for lifelong partnerships are rising when forces that keep people in relationships are weakening
Religious and legal codes for marriages now waned
Interdependence - the mutual influence that two people have over each other is the defining feature of any social relationship, intimate or otherwise
Interdependence in bidirectional, it operates in both directions at once
It also extends over time, with later exchanges gaining meaning from earlier ones
“Relationship” - carries the implication that there is some degree of continuity between the successive interactions
Interdependence is a necessary condition for intimacy, but it is not a sufficient condition for intimacy
Intimate relationships occur between interdependent people, but two people who treat each other as unique individuals rather than as interchangeable occupants or particular social roles/positions
Impersonal relationships - tend to be formal and task-oriented (shoekeeper and regular customer, patient and nurse, etc.)
Personal relationships - relatively informal and engage us at a deeper emotional levels - the unique characters of personal versus impersonal relationship is the character of the relationship
Not all personal relationships are intimate ones
A close relationship is one of strong, frequent, and diverse interdependence that lasts over a considerable period of time - the presence of closeness adds something special to personal relationships, as reflected in the strength, frequency, and diversity of the influence partners have over each other
Seven Common Attributes of Intimate Relationships
Desire - wanting to be united with the partner, physically and emotionally
Idealization - believing the partner is unique and special
Disclosure - sharing events, emotions, and experiences
Coordination - working together to accomplish key projects and tasks
Proximity - taking steps to maintain or restore physical closeness or emotional contact with the partner
Prioritizing - giving the relationship more importance than other interests and responsibilities
Caring - experiencing and expressing feelings of empathy and compassion for the partner
Intimate relationship
- being characterized by strong, sustained mutual influence over a broad range of interactions, particularly when those interactions serve to deepen and expand a sense of closeness beyond that in a friendship
Love in intimate relationships is defined by three main components:
Passion - magical love at first sight aspect of love, full of ardor and longing, tinged with obsession and an intense preoccupation with the partner, and often arousing a strong desire for sexual fulfillment
Intimacy - sharing and caring element of live, marked by warm and comfortable feelings of attachment, trust, and authentic friendship, as well as profound sense of mutual caring and respect
Commitment - through thick and thin part of live, demonstrated first by the decision to be in a relationship and then by a willingness to remain in it, and involving a dedication to maintaining the partnership
Kinds of Love
Romantic love - these relationships tend to burn brightly and fade quickly - many involvement during adolescence and early adulthood fall here
Fatuous love - whirlwind courtships full of passionate sex and vows to remain together, but lacking the sharing and caring needed to sustain those feelings
Companionate love - where passion and sex are not so central to the relationships, while friendship, open disclosure and dedication give partners a foundation for working together
Consummate love - passion, intimacy, and commitment - sustaining this is the real challenge
Intimacy and sexual passion accomplish different goals - governed by different brain regions - sexual passion promotes mating, while love deepens our connection to a specific partner
Commitment is different from intimacy - people committed to strong relationship communicate more constructively
Intimacy, passion, and commitment develop at different rates - intimacy develops first and most rapidly, then sexual passion then rises holds steady then declines, commitment comes later but increases at much same rate as intimacy
Social scientists tend to theorize about ideas instead of things
Psychological constructs - an abstract concept, such as love, trust, and commitment, that scientists strive to define, and study - products of human thoughts
Operationalization - translate abstract ideas into something concrete that can be observed or measured - researches never actually measure the constructs themselves; they can only measure operationalizations
Relationships are multidetermine, meaning they’re affected by many different sources of influence at once
Unlike objects, couples are human beings who understand and react to being studied, so researchers are required to be sensitive to the needs of their participants
Self-reports - from partners, their own descriptions and evaluations, are the most commonly used sources of data relationship researchers use
Zick Rubin developed the classic Love Scale - respondent indicate their agreement with 13 statement about their feelings for their current patterns on a scale of 1 - 9
Fixed-response scales - (love scale) the researcher determines the specific questions and possible answers, making it easy to compare responses between individuals
Open-ended question - the researcher asks a questions and the respondent gives any answer that comes to mind - can use to generate more specific questions
Qualitative research - approach that relies primarily on open-ended questions and other loosely structured information
Pros and cons to self-reports:
The require little equipment
Often only way of measuring constructs of great interest to relationship researchers
Self resorts have high construct validity - great deal of overlap between the operationalization and the construct in which the researchers are interested
Convenience of self-reports can lead researchers to overlook some complexities in interpreting the results
People can’t tell you what they don’t know
People can’t describe what they don’t remember - self-reports about behavior may be unreliable
People can’t give meaningful answers if they misunderstood the questions
People’s reluctance to answer questions accurately when a true answer makes them look bad - social desirability effect - the tendency of research participants to give answers they think will make them look good, rather than saying what they actually know
Omnibus measure - the idea that satisfaction with a relationship is based on opinions about the relationship as a whole, as well as opinions about a range of specific aspects
These measures work fine until you want to compare those scores with scores from another instrument that measures something more specific
Item-overlap problem - when tools that are measuring different constructs contain questions about similar topics
Global measures - measures that ask partners only about their evaluations of their relationship as a whole
Observational measures - gather data about relationship events without having to ask the people who are experiencing them, often by audio or video recording them instead
Sentiment override - partner’s general feelings about the relationship frequently overwhelm their perceptions of specific aspects of the relationship
Deciding what behaviors to observe can be challenging to determine
Interrater reliability - the extent to which different observers agree that a specified behavior has or has not occurred
Pros and Cons
Observations directly assess behaviors of great interest to relationship researchers
They avoid some specific problems with self-reports - less chance to rely on faulty/limited memories
Main problems is possibility of reactivity - when the act of observing a behavior actually changes that behavior
Indirect measures - which the couple being studies either don’t know, or can’t control, the information they are providing
Reaction time - the time it takes to recognize a stimulus when its flashed briefly on a screen
Implicit attitudes - the automatic tendency to associate a stimulus with positive or negative feelings
Pros and Cons
Indirect measures can show what they are thinking and feeling anyway when people are unwilling or unable to answer direct questions
Distance between specific behaviors that indirect measurements examine and the abstract constructs researchers want to study is the biggest limitation
Psychological responses - the body’s physical reactions to specific experiences
fMRIS have helped examine how feelings of love relate to the activation of specific areas in the brain
Area associated with reward and motivation lit up more brightly when partners gazed at their loved one than when they viewed a friend
Pros and cons
The ultimate indirect measure - free from concerns about social desirability or faulty memories
Offer window to link between body and mind
Meaning of any physiological response can be ambiguous
Best research adopts a multiple-method approach - operationalizing the construct of interest in different ways and hoping the limitations of each measurement strategy will eventually cancel each other out, thereby letting the effects the research is most focused on emerge clearly
Correlational research - study naturally occurring associations among variables; it is aimed primarily at answering descriptive questions
Pros and cons
Valuable when studying variables that cannot be maniu;ated or studied in other ways
Can’t confirm any causal effects - correlation does not imply causation
Cross-sectional data - data describe a cross-section, or a snapshot, of a single moment
Longitudinal research - important type of correlational research, describes what a phenomenon looks like over time and how it might change
Can be hard determine the appropriate interval between each measurement
To understand variability and change at a daily levels research use a daily diary approach
Experience sampling - gathering data from people throughout the day, “sampling” from the totality of their daily experiences
Rochester Interaction Record (RIR) - asks people to fill out a short form every time they interact with some for more than 10 minutes
Pros and cons
Helpful when wanting to describe how relationships change, or predicting which relationships will last/end
Lets researchers examine processes that would be impossible or unethical to study in other ways (breakups)
This design is expensive and time consuming - can lose participants along the way - attrition bias - final sample in a longitudinal study differs from the initial sample as certain kinds of couple have dropped out
The conclusions that can be drawn are limited - closer than cross-sectional to supporting causal statements due to cause has to precede its effect, still now causal in the end
Experimental research - take more active role by manipulating one element of a phenomenon or situation to determine its effects on the rest
You need a dependent variable, an independent variable, control, and random assignment
DV - the effect our outcome that researches want to understand
IV - the possible cause, the aspect of the experimental situation the researcher manipulates
Control - hold constant, all aspects of the experimental situations that are not manipulating
Random assignment - guarantees that every research participant has an equal chance of being exposed to each version of the experimental manipulation
Pros and cons
Move beyond description and prediction to address explanations about intimate relationships
Isolating effects of specific variables risk distorting how those variables behave in the real world
Issue of external validity - whether the results of an experiment apply in other situations, or generalize to different contexts
Archival research - research examines existing data that have already been gathered, often for an unrelated purpose, by someone else
Sample - people who provide the data, they are a subset of a broader population that could have provided very similar data
Representative samples - samples consisting of people who are similar to the population to which the researchers would like to generalize
Convenience samples - samples that are collected because they are easy to find, such as white people easy to find on campuses where a lot of this research takes place
Psychoanalysis - theory that popularized the distinction between the conscious and unconscious mind (Founded by Freud)
More ask about early childhood memories, and recent dreams
Believed relationship problems surface when partners begin to play out with each other their unresolved issues and conflicts with their parents
Radical behaviorism - idea that behaviors are shaped, or conditioned, by their consequences, and that positive consequences make behaviors more likely and negative make less likely (founded by Skinner)
More ask about current relationship and recurring patterns/behaviors
Successful relationships depend on the extent to which pleasing behaviors are extinguished through negative reinforcement
Theory - an interconnected set of beliefs, knowledge, and assumption that are used to understand a phenomenon or situation
Influential theories:
Consist of a set of explicit premises, forms the basis for the specific predictions about how the world works
Inspires research and scholarship
Make accurate predictions
Evolutionary perspective - seeks answers in the distant past, when species first evolved to its present form
Humans must reproduce to pass their genes to the next generation - natural selection
Evolutionary psychology - assumes that the brain, like every organ in the body, evolved in response to specific selection pressures that led some preferences and capacities to be associated with more successful reproduction, and others to be associated with less successful reproduction
Features of the brain today exist because they were beneficial or adaptive
Questions here surround the adaptive function of human behavior
Feature may be adaptive for two reasons:
It increases an organism’s chance for survival
It directly increase an organism’s chance of successfully reproducing by helping the organism attract or compete for mates - sexual selection
Psychological mechanisms - the preferences, capacities, responses, and strategies characterizing our species
Some people feel this implies people are merely biological machines lacking ability to respond and learn from the environment - but think of psychological mechanisms like physiological organs, so responsive to the environment
Evolutionary mismatch - situations in which evolved tendencies that were adaptive in our ancestral past fail to be adaptive, or even maladaptive, in the present (preference for sweet flavors vs bitter)
Environment of evolutionary adaptedness - the period tens of thousands of years ago when our species took it current form
Theory of parental investment
expanded on Darwin’s ideas - sexual selection pressures can vary based on the amount of energy and resources each parents must invest to raise offspring
Typically high for partner who becomes pregnant, whereas men have low parental investment
Direct response to different challenges in environment of evolutionary adaptedness, observe gender differences in preferences and mating behaviors of men and women
Women more likely to value long-term mate with better financial prospects
Men more likely to value long-term mate who more physically attractive
Most women with partner older than themselves
Men more upset when find out partner in another sexual relationship
Women develop greater sensitivity to and preferences for cues indicating a partner's fertility and fidelity
Evolutionary psychologists argue if they can identify aspects of mating behavior common to entire human species, these behaviors are likely to represent evolved mechanisms
They also think about what the environment was like, what adaptive challenges humans would have faced and what mechanisms may have developed
Promise of evolutionary perspective is how people attract and select mates
Attachment theory - proposes that the intimate relationships we form as adults are shaped by the nature of the bonds we formed with our primary caregivers during infancy and early childhood
Established by John Bowlby - familiar with Freud’s theories about childhood on adult life
Survival during infancy requires active presence of a primary caregiver
Attachment figure - someone who provides the child with comfort and safety
Attachment behavior system - set of behaviors and reactions that monitors and promotes the closeness of caregivers
Three key factors:
We pay attention to our own internal states
Keep track of our caregiver’s availability and responsiveness
We look out for potential threats in the environment
Want to maintain felt security
Early interactions with caregivers teach infants two important lessons about the world:
Infants learn about themselves - if treated with warmth, learn that they are lovable
Infants learn about their attachment figures - if caregivers are dependable, they learn people can be trusted
Working models
if experiences accumulated in memory they developed into these, internal structures that represent the conscious and unconscious beliefs, expectations, and feelings people have about themselves, others, and relationships
Same system that maintains our attachments to caregivers should get activated by our other attachments, like romantic ones
Lessons learned in infancy affect how we think about closeness and intimacy
Bowlby thought every person’s working models were as distinct as fingerprints, but have two dimensions:
Anxiety
Avoidance
Each dimension corresponds to two key lessons:
Views about the self correspond to levels of anxiety about relationships
Views about attachment figures correspond to the tendency to avoid closeness and vulnerability
Attachment styles - useful in describing how people’s orientations toward intimacy can differ:
Secure attachment - positive view of themselves and others, low in attachment related anxiety and avoidance
Preoccupied attachment - have a positive view of others, and therefore are low in attachment-related avoidance. Their low self-worth leaves them chronically high in anxiety
Dismissing attachment - view themselves as worthy of others’ care and attention, so low in attachment-related anxiety. View others as not likely to be caring and available, and tend to value self-sufficiency
Fearful attachment - negative view of themselves and others, causing high anxiety, tend to seek validation from others, but have sense others will not provide the affirmation they need
60% of people have secure attachment style
When partner was nervous for a speech, secure people steeped up and provided support, where insecure people responded with same need by pulling back, weak support
Insecure people more alert to signs of problems in intimate relationships, and get more upset when discussing those problems - their excess concerns about threats to relationship appear to make threats more damaging
Attachment styles can change. Continuity of attachment between childhood and early adulthood is significantly lower for children exposed to many difficulty life events
Attachment theory adopts a developmental perspective that is lacking in other theories of intimate relationships
Early experiences description on intimacy, offers explanation for how this continuity may come about
Explains variability in values and expectations people bring to their relationships
Intimate relationships, parent-child relationships, and primate ones manifest in a single behavioral system
Attachment theory has limited explanation of how a specific relationship develops between two people
Basic premises about what healthy intimacy looks like based in Western, industrialized society
Social exchange theory - suggests that participants in all social interactions pursue their self-interest through the exchange of social goods, such as status, approval, and information
By identifying the perceived payoffs of specific behaviors, this theory predicts what people will do in any given situation and how they will feel about the results of their actions
Developed in late 1950s/early 1960s that combined principles of Skinner’s behaviorism, with elementary economics
Thibaut and Kelley first people to propose that the defining feature of any relationship was interdependence, their version of social exchange theory was interdependence theory
People approach relationships like economic decisions, analyzing the benefits and drawback (rewards and costs)
Rewards - any of the ways a relationships may meet the needs and desire of each partner
Costs - any of the consequences of being in a relationship that prevent partners from meeting their needs and desires
Theory assumes people driven to maximize their rewards and minimize their costs - people have good instincts about possible advantages and disadvantages of a situations
Material rewards - adequate food and protection
Social rewards - companionship, validation and security
Opportunity cost - price of not pursuing a possible reward
Subjective probability
your own judgement about the likelihood of different possible outcomes your actions will have
Comparison levels
partners to compare their perceived experiences to a certain standard of what they think they deserve - positive must exceed the level we think we deserve
Dependence
on the relationships, how free a person feels to leave, should be a function of how the relationship compares to the possible alternatives
Comparison level for alternatives (CL_alt)
partner’s perceptions of potential options, pointing out that this standard may be entirely independent from that person’s CL
Alternatives - ll possible situations outside of a current relationships, including being alone
Barriers - all the forces outside of a relationship that act to keep partners together
Investments - the resources a committed couple shares that would presumably be lost following a breakup
Commitment - the intention to remain in and maintain a relationship
Helped explain why couples stay together or drift apart - where there are fewer alternative partners, people are more dependent on their current relationship
Also research how people who are committed to each other, respond to threats in their relationship - committed partner more willing to make sacrifices on behalf of their relationship
This theory can be applied to any specific question to suggest how different variables combine to affect relationships
Little to say about how initially satisfied couples reach those outcomes
Social learning theory - more interpersonal approach and defines rewards and costs in terms of the behaviors partners exchange during their interactions with each other
One partner’s behavior in the other’s presence may be rewarding or punishing to another partner, this will lead to some rewarding or punishing response, which is responded to in turn
Narrower approach than social exchange, focusing on what goes on between partners
Behaviors partners exhibit during their interactions directly predict the quality of their intimate relationship, positive behaviors strengthen
Emphasis on behaviors/skills arose in response to needs of clinical psychologist - couples complain about quality of their communication
Theory grows out of assumption daily interactions are essence of any interpersonal relationship - sequence of action and reaction between partners, is the way two people make contact
Partners learn from their experiences in each interaction about the quality of their relationship
Satisfying exchange, partners learn they can trust each other, communicate effectively, and be loves/respected
Coercion theory - offshoot of social learning theory, two people may reinforce each other’s undesirable behaviors unintentionally
Escape conditioning - reinforcing of behaviors that lead to ending a negative experience
Social learning theory had large impact on how research on intimate relationships was conducted - early research was questionnaires, which then turned into recording couples interactions and observing them
Initially goals was to identify specific behaviors associated with satisfying relationships and effective problem solving
Negative reciprocity - distressed couples more negative in general, also demonstrated greater tendency to respond to each other’s negativity with more negativity - big predictor of unhappy relationships
Social learning theory emphasizes ongoing dynamics between patterns, as couple (dyad) basic unit of analysis
Offers perceptive a perspective on change in intimate relationships other theories lack - offer explanation how how change may come about
Developed new methods for observing and describing couples
Strong focus on interactions is the biggest limitation
Silent about where communication skills come from and why they might vary across couples
Its inability to explain certain common patterns of relationship development
Social ecology - range of approaches emphasizing the interplay between people and their environment
Social ecological model - explains how the stresses, supports, and constraints in the environment of a couple may affect the way partners think, feel, and act in their relationship
Microsystem - couple’s family and friends
Mesosystem - neighbourhood, social system, and culture in which relationship takes place
Macrosystem - national and historical forces affecting the relationship
ABC-X Model (crisis theory) - four letters corresponding to four elements Hill considered crucial to understanding the effects of external challenges on relationships
A - stressor - any event requiring some sort of behavioral response (having baby, losing job, getting sick)
B - resources - all the assets a couple may use in coping with a stressor (money, family, religious group
Family’s level of resources changes how they experiences a particular stressor
C - interpretation of the event - whether the couple perceived the stressor as a challenge to be overcome or a catastrophe to be endured
X - crisis - nature of A, B, and C lead to this, the couple’s experience of and response to the stressful event
If stress is severe, resources are low, and interpretation is negative, Hill predicts couples will find it hard to adapt effectively, so weaker relationships
Criticism - every element addresses state of relationship in a single moment
Double ABC-X model - suggests each elements in Hill’s model has initial meaning as well as one that emerges gradually
Stress pile-up - domino effect, can be as stressful or even more stressful, than original event itself
Accounts for resources couple can access in response to an event
Accounts for couple’s interpretation of ongoing coping efforts will also affect relationship
Lifespan studies - assess individuals repeatedly over the course of 50 years or more
Husbands got married pre war and served more likely to end in divorce than those who did not serve
Problems is its expense and duration - so maybe identify couples who tend to have varying degrees of stress day to day
Theory helps explain patterns of changes by proposing relationship satisfaction usually decreases when environmental demands exceed couple's ability o cope effectively
Limitations stem from failure to specify how some of the links between relationships and outside influences affect personal dynamics within the relationship
Three unifying themes in theories of intimate relationships:
Dyadic interaction
Individual differences - partners are not blank slates, bring past experiences with them
External circumstances - relationships affected not only from within them, but also external circumstances