1/86
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
The Behaviourist Approach
learning takes place through the processes of classical and operant conditioning
The Behaviourist Approach - key assumptions
- born as blank slates
- all behaviour learned through experience
- only interested in studying behaviour that can be observed and measured
- ignores mental processes of the mind; too vague
The Behaviourist Approach - stimulus generalisation
once conditioned, they will respond in the same way to other stimuli similar to the CS
The Behaviourist Approach - extinction
if the CS is presented a few times without the UCS, it eventually stops producing the CR
The Behaviourist Approach - spontaneous recovery
even though the CR appears to have been extinguished, it my sometimes reappear at a later time
The Behaviourist Approach - classical conditioning (PAVLOV)
learning through association - it is when (e.g. a food) is consistently associated with another stimulus (e.g. a bell) until the new stimulus eventually produces the original response e.g salivation
The Behaviourist Approach - operant conditioning
SKINNER suggested that learning is an active process whereby humans and animals operate on their environment
- behaviour is shaped by its consequences
The Behaviourist Approach - operant conditioning (consequences of behaviour)
positive reinforcement:
receiving a reward when a certain behaviour is performed - when you gain something as a consequence e.g a sticker is given when answering a question right
negative reinforcement:
doing something that avoids something unpleasant e.g. feeding a baby so that it stops crying and you can go to sleep
punishment:
unpleasant consequence of behaviour e.g given a detention
positive and negative reinforcement increase the likelihood of that behaviour will be repeated. punishment decreases the likelihood.
The Behaviourist Approach - SKINNER'S STUDY
- conducted experiments with rats and sometimes pigeons in specifically designed cages called 'SKINNER BOXES'
- every time the rat activated the lever, (or pecked a disc - pigeon) within the box, it was rewarded with a food pellet
- thus the animal would continue this behaviour
also showed that pigeons and rats could be conditioned to perform the same behaviour to avoid an unpleasant stimulus e.g an electric shock
The Behaviourist Approach - continuous reinforcement
reinforcing every time a desirable behaviour is performed - most effective in establishing a particular response
The Behaviourist Approach - partial reinforcement
reinforcing every nth time the behaviour is shown - most effective in maintaining behaviour and avoiding extinction
The Behaviourist Approach - determinism
- proposes all behaviour has a cause - predictable
- free will is an illusion and our behaviour is governed by internal and external forces where we have no control over
this approach is environmentally deterministic; behaviour is determined by environment thus ignores influence of free will.
Evaluating the Behaviourist Approach - based on exp. method
P: research supporting is based on the experimental method
E: Skinner's use of the Skinner box allowed him to manipulate the IV and see effects on DV whilst using controlled conditions and eliminate extraneous variables
E: strength as it allows us to establish a cause+effect relationship (where the change in IV really changes the DV). research is objective as it's measuring observable behaviour + high control = easier to replicate
L: however, conducted in lab setting therefore lacks eco val - unclear if this is reflective of real life.
Evaluating the Behaviourist Approach - real life app.
P: classical + operant conditioning have led to real life app.
E: token economy systems have been successfully used in prisons which reward good behaviour for privileges (operant). Classical has been used to develop treatments to overcome phobias e.g systematic desensitisation (works by stopping the anxiety response (CR) that is associated with the feared objects (CS)
E: approach can be used to better lives of people in society and improve environment in institutions
L: highlights the psychological value of the behaviourist approach
Evaluating the Behaviourist Approach - based on animals
P: mainly based on research with animals
E: referred to as 'Anthropomorphism' where the findings of animal behaviour is applied to humans. thus this may not tell us much about human behaviour
E: problem - humans have conscious thoughts and insights to their behaviour unlike animals; findings like Skinner's can't be generalised to humans. other approaches that take into mental processes e.g. cognitive approach, can explain human behaviour better
L: criticised for being environmentally deterministic; sees all behaviour is determined by environ. and ignores influence of free will, therefore is a limited explanation
Evaluating the Behaviourist Approach - unethical
P: use of animals - ethical guidelines broken
E: BPS guidelines (protection from harm) was broken - Skinner's box, animals were under stressful conditions e.g electrical shocks
E: animals under stress react differently in experimental conditions compared to if they were relaxed. can't be sure that this type of learning takes place in a natural environ. Plus, humans are much more reactive to cues from experimenter - issues around generalisation to human behaviour
L: offers a limited explanation in explaining human behaviour thus lacks ex. val.
Social Learning Theory (SLT)
the theory that we learn social behaviour by observing and imitating (indirectly) and by being rewarded or punished (directly)
we observe consequences of our own actions and others which influence social behaviour
Social Learning Theory - assumptions
- agrees w/ the behaviourist approach that behaviour is much learned through experience
- takes into account the important cognitive and mental process that occur between stimulus and response
STIMULUS ---> cognitive processes ---> RESPONSE
SLT - mediational processes definition
don't automatically observe model's behaviour + imitate - there are internal processes that occur (mediational)
- determine whether the behaviour is learned or not (ARMM)
SLT - mediational processes
A: ATTENTION
- must be noticed to be imitated
R: RETENTION
- behaviour is not always noticed but is remembered; refers to how well it's remembered, a memory of it needs to be formed
M: MOTOR REPRODUCTION
- ability of the observer to reproduce the behaviour
M: MOTIVATION
- the will to try perform the behaviour, influenced by whether the behaviour was rewarded or punished (if rewarded, behaviour is more likely to be imitated
SLT - key aspects (MIVI)
MI: MODELLING + IMITATION
- a role model carries out a behaviour/attitude (e.g aggression) so this model can be a live model e.g. parent that provide examples of these behaviours which is imitated (copied)
V: VICARIOUS REINFORCEMENT
- learning through observation of consequences of other's behaviour
- behaviour is more likely to be imitated if rewarded
- suggest that individuals do not need to directly experience rewards/punishments to learn
I: IDENTIFICATION
- to which extent a person relates to a model and thinks they'll experience the same outcomes as them
- more likely to identify with people the same age/gender
SLT - Bandura (1961)
aim:
to investigate if behaviour (aggression) can be learned through observations of models
procedure:
- sample = 3-5 year olds (72 children, half boys and girls)
- half of children watched adult model play with Bobo doll aggressively + half watched model play gently
- placed in a room full of toys and Bobo doll
findings:
- children who observed aggressive behaviour = carried out physical and verbal aggression toward the doll
- children who observed gentle behaviour = displayed no aggression
- children more likely to imitate if model was the same gender
SLT - Bandura and Walters
procedure:
- showed children videos of adults behaviour being aggressive
1) adults rewarded for behaviour
2) adults punished
3) no consequence
findings:
children who saw the model being rewarded were more likely to imitate aggressive behaviour + show higher levels of aggression in their own play
SLT evaluation - research support modelling + imitation
P: research to support
E: Bandura conducted a study [state findings of study]
E: support SLT - SL can take place through observing role models as the children were imitating behaviour observed. findings: if model is more similar to child, they're more likely to identify therefore good explanation
L: however, children may have been aware (demand characteristics) - artificial setting therefore just hit the doll. not true behaviour, decr. int. val. --> research offers little support for SLT
SLT evaluation - real life app.
P: real life app in helping the development of more effective health campaigns
E: to maximise effectiveness, campaigns have tried to match the character that models desired behaviour w/ target audience (w/ physical attributes/attitudes/behaviours). research has found that anti-alcohol campaigns have been most effective when similarity to role model was increased.
E: shows aspects of the theory - plays an important role in whether learning takes place or not therefore influencing behaviour. helps develop successful health campaigns --> helps economy + reduce stress on NHS + decr. unhealthy behaviour
L: shows how psychological research can have beneficial impacts on the economy
SLT evaluation - fails to take into account other approaches/explanation
P: criticised for failing to take into account other approaches
E: argues that behaviour is a sole consequence of SL, this means it doesn't consider to role other factors play in influencing behaviour. e.g doesn't include details of biological influences + in Bandura's study, boys are more aggressive than girls regardless of the specifics
E: suggests that other factors other than SL + the increase in behaviours in the boys may have been due to hormonal factors such as testosterone levels
L: limited approach and incomplete explanation - fails to acknowledge any other factors
SLT evaluation - better explanation than behaviourist approach
P: better explanation than the behaviourist approach
E: SLT takes into account to cognitive factors involved in learning but the behav. app. argues that all behaviour is a result of op + class conditioning only
E: relying on the behav. app.l is problematic - believed that humans store info about the behaviour of others use this to make judgements about when it is appropriate to do so (SLT takes this into account) . Therefore argued, less deterministic, than behav. app. ; doesn't suggest behav. is determined by environ. therefore acknowledges free will in how be behave
L: despite weaknesses of SLT, it provides a more comprehensive explanation of human learning than behav. app. therefore SLT contributes more to our understanding of human behaviour
The Cognitive Approach - definitions of schema and inference
inference:
process where cognitive psychology draws conclusions about the way mental processes work on the basis of observed behaviour
schema:
a 'package' of beliefs and expectations on a topic that comes from prior experience. they act as a cognitive framework that helps organise and interpret information
- schemas affect behaviour
- as we get older, our schema becomes more detailed and complex through experience
The Cognitive Approach - assimilation
adding new information on to an existing schema
The Cognitive Approach - accomodation
when new information changes our understanding so we then create a new schema
The Cognitive Approach - pros and cons of schemas
pros:
- act as mental shortcuts that help process large amounts of information and fill in gaps
- help make sense of new info
cons:
- may distort interpretations when something doesn't fit our pre-existing schema
- can cause errors in processing and retrieving info e.g EWT, and stereotypes
The Cognitive Approach - cognitive neuroscience
the scientific study of the influence of brain structures on mental processes
Paul Broca had identified how damage in an area in the frontal lobe could permanently impair speech production
in the last 20 years, scientists have been able to systematically observe and describe the neurological basis on mental processes
The Cognitive Approach - cognitive neuroscience application
- neuroimaging techniques (MRI + PET) helps show parts of the brain that are active when brain is doing certain tasks
- scanning techniques that proves useful in establishing the neurological basis of some mental disorders (e.g link between OCD and the para hippocampal gyrus)
---> this is useful as it means that these disorders can be better understood and interventions/treatments can be created to support these individuals.
- imaging techniques have been used to study the effect of normal ageing of the brain or to observe the effects of strokes on the brain
The Cognitive Approach - key assumptions
thoughts act as meditational processes between stimulus and behavioural response --> thoughts influence our behaviour
- essential that we look at mental processes that occur - if we don't it is an incomplete explanation
STIMULUS --> THINKING --> RESPONSE (BEHAVIOUR)
(PSYCHOPATHOLOGY)
- area of depression
- assume disorders i.e depression is linked to faulty thinking processes; irrational thoughts + beliefs
mental processes can be regarded as information processing
- cognitive psychologist use theoretical models to represent these internal processes - changed, updated in the face of new evidence
- informational processing approach!
(MEMORY)
- models of memory follow an informational processing approach
- e.g MSM, WMM,
- refers to how info is stored and processed, and encoded
the mind can be viewed as a computer
- human mind explained with a computer analogy
- similarities in how info is processed
- brain is seen as central processing unit; codes info into usable format and stores it
(AI)
- linked to the development of AI and thinking machines
internal mental processes can and should be investigated scientifically
- should be studied e.g. perception. memory etc
- studies it indirectly by inferring what is going on from evidence gathered
- use lab experiments to investigate behaviour
(COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT - AREA IN MEMORY)
- experiments have shown people can only remember 5-9 items on a memory test (capacity of STM)
Cognitive Approach evaluation - highly controlled
P: highly controlled and rigorous methods used to investigate assumptions
E: research investigating uses highly controlled lab exps. that enable inference for cognitive processes
E: allows objective data to be produced and the high controls meant there is a possibility to replicate to test reliability. focuses on exp methods therefore means cog app helped scientific status of psych = greater credibility
L: BUT exp studies often carried our with artificial stimuli e.g memory tests that lack mundane realism. lowers ext. val. and casts doubt on whether cog. app is trult representative of behaviour
Cognitive Approach evaluation - irl
P: has irl application despite weakness
E: cognitive neuroscience has helped to understand the neurological basis of mental health disorders. led to the development of treatments such as CBT therapy for
depression. computer analogy = cognitive psychology has made important contributions artificial intelligence
E: benefited society across a range of areas, e.g. health
and technology by improving the lives of individuals suffering with depression.
L: highlights the psychological value of the cognitive approach.
Cognitive Approach evaluation - comparing the human mind to a computer is not a good analogy
P: unsophisticated analogy
E: focus mainly on the logical aspects of cognitive processing and less on the emotional + social aspects that also affect thinking. e.g human memory has been shown to be affected by emotional factors such as anxiety which is ignored in the cognitive approach.
E: does not recognise how much more complex
humans are than machines
L: suffers with machine reductionism by ignoring the
influence other factors have on our thinking; weakens the validity - limited and incomplete explanation.
Cognitive Approach evaluation - less determinist
P: less determinist than other approaches
E: recognises that our cognitive system can only operate within the limits of what we know but that we are free to think before responding to a stimulus
E:offers a logical compromise in suggesting that our thoughts are 'freely' chosen only within the limits of our knowledge and experience.
L: better approach because it takes into account that we have a choice and free-will to think of how to respond to a stimulus rather than completely being controlled by environment.
The Biological Approach
An approach that emphasises the importance of physical processes in the body on our behaviour e.g genetic inheritance and neural function.
The Biological Approach - how to understand behaviour
- must look into biological structures and processes e.g genes, neurochemistry and nervous system
- an understanding of brain structure and function can explain our thoughts and behaviour
The Biological Approach - twin studies
Twin studies are used to see if certain behaviours are inherited by comparing concordance rates between identical (MZ) and non-identical twins (DZ)
MZ: monozygotic (share 100% of genes)
DZ: dizygotic (share 50% of genes)
The Biological Approach - concordance rate definition
rate of probability that 2 people with shared genes will develop the same behaviour/disorder
if behaviour is inherited/genetic, you would expect to see a higher concordance rate the closer the degree of relatedness is.
The Biological Approach - adoption studies
Adoption studies are much better at studying the effects of nurture (upbringing)
They enable us to see the influence of nature vs nurture
- positive correlation between aggressive behaviour in adopted children and bio. parents = genetic
- positive correlation between aggressive behaviour in adopted children and adopted family = environmental effect
The Biological Approach - genetic basis of behaviour
our genetic inheritance comes from our parents - we have 50% of mother's genes and 50% of father's.
this explains why we may share both physical and psychological characteristics with our parents.
genes contain the blueprint for genetic characteristics
how the genes are developed/expressed depends on the interaction between nature and nurture.
The Biological Approach - genotype and phenotype
genotype
the genetic makeup that is written in the DNA of an individual's cells
phenotype
the physical appearance of that genotype in the individual which is determined by the genes - it is the combination of genes and the environment.
The Biological Approach - genes
genes carry the instruction for a particular characteristic but how this characteristic develops partly depends on the interaction of the genes with other genes, and the environment
The Biological Approach - evolution
individuals need to compete for resources (food) and any inherited trait that increases reproductive success e.g fitness iss elected, and will be passed onto offspring
--> NATURAL SELECTION
successful traits become more widespread in the population; any traits unsuited for the environment will die out.
The Biological Approach - evolution and behaviour
individuals within a species will naturally differ from another in their characteristics/behaviour, and some is inherited.
those who have adapted characteristics and are more likely to survive and reproduce thus behaviours will pass on
behaviours become more widespread thus these will be passed on to increase chances of survival
Biological Approach evaluation - irl
P: has real life application
E: increased understanding of the bio. processes in the brain has left to dev. of psychoactive drugs that treat serious mental illnesses e.g depression
E: means sufferers are able to manage their condition and live relatively well , reducing burden on NHS
L: highlights the psychological value - positive impact for soc
Biological Approach evaluation - scientific
P: uses scientific measures
E: use of PET and ECG scans are helpful insight to the influence of behaviour
E: provides us with objective data that is free from bias
L: beneficial - improves rep + credibility of psych
Biological Approach evaluation - ignores influence of environment
P: ignores influence of environmental factors
E: Twins and family all have genetic similarities + argues they should behave similarly on a genetic basis but it ignores environmental conditions
E: weakness - can't explain why MZ does not have a 100% concordance rate, suggesting that environmental factors play a role
L: offers incomplete and limited explanation that underestimates the complexity of human behaviour
Biological Approach evaluation - determinist
P: has a determinist view on behaviour
E: says human behaviour is governed by internal causes e.g genetics which we have no control over
E: ignores influence of free will and that we often have the choice in how we behave. means criminal can't be held accountable for their actions as their behaviour is a consequence of their genes - invalidates victims and offers excuses
L: BUT it has pos. implications for soc. - able to discover genetic predispositions for mental health problems. thus people can be supported with interventions quicker, improving QoL. lots of pos. and neg. implications that need to be taken into account when using it to explain behaviour
The Psychodynamic Approach - key assumptions
- events in our childhood have a great influence on our adult lives that shape personality
- early relationships are important esp. parent-child
- unconscious roles in our mind determine our thoughts, feelings, behaviours
The Psychodynamic Approach - the role of the unconscious
ICEBERG ANALOGY
conscious mind:
the part of our mind that we know and are aware of
preconscious mind:
contains our thoughts and memories which aren't in conscious awareness but can be accessed if desired
unconscious mind:
part of the mind that we are unaware of but drives much of our behaviour and personality - accessed through dreams/slip of the tongue
The Psychodynamic Approach - structure of our personality
alike the mind, the personality is split into three parts - id, and superego are like opposites thus they are always in conflict. the ego balances them out and stops conflict by using defence mechanisms
Id:
- present at birth - 'pleasure principle'
- entirely selfish part of out personalities, demands immediate satisfaction
- made up of unconscious desires and instincts
Ego:
- develops at age 2 - 'reality principle'
- mediates between Id and Superego i.e delay satisfying id until a better time
- role is to reduce conflict (using defence mechs)
Superego:
- formed at 5 (phallic stage) - 'morality principle'
- sometimes referred as out conscience
- represents moral standards of soc. and same sex parent
- causes feelings of guilt when rules are broken.
The Psychodynamic Approach - defence mechanisms
RDRD
Repression:
forcing a distressing memory out of the conscious into the unconscious - automatic but still affects behaviour e.g an abused child w/ no recollection but have trouble forming relationships
Denial:
refusing to accept some aspect of reality - a person may act like the event never happened
Rationalisation:
controversial behaviours are justified and explained in a rational manner to avoid the true explanation - made consciously tolerable
Displacement:
redirecting thoughts/feelings (usually hostile) from the source of the distress to another person/object
The Psychodynamic Approach - personality development
Freud claimed that child development occurred in 5 stages, each stage marked by a different conflict that the child must resolve in order to be psychologically healthy, and to progress to the next stage.
all children were born with a libido (sexual urge) but are unconscious of it and unaware
mental abnormality can occur if one has unresolved conflicts which results in becoming fixated as a stage (stuck). this will carry certain behaviours into adulthood
The Psychodynamic Approach - psychosexual stages
Oral (0-2)
- focus of pleasure in mouth; only id is present
- success. completion = eating independently
- unresolved = oral behaviour e.g smoking/nail-biting
Anal (2-3)
- focus of pleasure in anus - ego develops
- success. completion = potty trained
- unresolved = anal retentive (harshly potty trained) = perfectionist + obsessive
- anal expulsive (lenient potty trained) = thoughtless + messy
Phallic (3-6)
- focus of pleasure in genital area; superego forms
- child experiences oedipus + electra complex
- success. completion = identification w/ same sex parent
- unresolved = narcissistic, reckless, maybe gay
Latent (6-12)
- earlier conflicts are repressed
Genital (12+)
- sexual desire becomes more conscious alongside the onset of puberty
- success. completion = forming healthy relationships
- unresolved = difficulty forming heterosexual relationships
(Only Awesome People Love Giraffes)
Psychodynamic Approach evaluation - irl
P: real world application
E: used to explain a wide range of phenomena i.e personality development and abnormal behaviour. draws attention to connection between childhood experiences and later dev.
+ a therapy (psychoanalysis) has been developed, designed to access the unconscious.
E: patients suffering with mild neuroses = improved their quality of life through the use of psychoanalysis - highlights soc. value of approach
L: this therapy has been criticised - not effective for severe ones e.g schizophrenia --> lost grip of reality, can't articulate thoughts and feelings. analysing patient's unconscious can intensify symptoms. only has irl app. to an extent; limited explan.
Psychodynamic Approach evaluation - can't generalise
P: issues with generalisability
E: intensive case studies done on individuals who were often in therapy
E: though it would give detailed data, claims formulated by Freud can't be used to explain all behaviour. impossible to make universal claims about human nature based on case studies of psych. abnormal people
L: Freud's interpretations of these individuals would have been highly subjective seen as they were observed by himself only. limited explanation
Psychodynamic Approach evaluation - unscientific
P: it's unscientific
E: concepts of id, ego, superego don't meet scientific criteria
E: all occur at an unconscious level, making them difficult to test - doesn't meet falsification/empirical evidence as it cannot be directly observed or be disproved.
L: although the concepts within the psychodynamic approach are not scientific, Fisher&Greenberg (1996) looked at 2,500 studies that had used scientific methods to test these concepts - found the existence of unconscious motives in human behaviour + support for defence mechanisms. provides approach w/ credible support and combating this criticism.
Psychodynamic Approach evaluation - determinist
P: determinist
E: suffers from 'psychic determinism' - argues all behaviour is driven by unconscious forces rooted in childhood.
E: ignoring the fact that individuals have free will in how
they choose to behave and instead views our behaviour as being determined by factors we have no control over.
L: offers a limited explanation of human behaviour.
Humanistic Approach
- emphasises the study of the whole person and believes in looking at the subjective experiences, feelings, and thoughts of a person
- rejects scientific models that try explain general principles of behaviour
Humanistic Approach - assumptions
- humans have free will and have free choices + not determined by external forces
- humans are active agents in their development
- person-centred approach
- people are basically good beings
- innate tendency to self-actualise and achieve full potential
Humanistic Approach - Maslow + hierarchy
Hierarchy of Needs
- we can only reach self-actualisation if we meet the other needs first
1: physiological e.g food + water
2. safety e.g shelter, a home
3. love/belonging e.g friendships + family
4. esteem e.g confidence + good self image
5. self-actualisation e.g morality, creativity etc
Humanistic Approach - Carl Rogers
said that personal growth requires a certain environment
- feelings of self worth develop in childhood through interactions with parents and significant others
Humanistic Approach - unconditional positive regard
when a person is accepted for who they are - associated with healthy psychological development and helps people reach self-actualisation
psychological problems in adulthood may be due to a lack of UPR from parents as a child
- only accepted if you behave how they want you to behave
Humanistic Approach - conditions of worth
conditions are placed on people by significant others which have to be fulfilled in order to earn positive regard from these people.
- individuals may only experience self acceptance if they meet these conditions --> this may lead to low self esteem and stop self-actualisation
Humanistic Approach - congruence
when the perceived self (how you see yourself) broadly match with your ideal self (who you would like to be). this is necessary for personal growth
Humanistic Approach - incongruence
if the gap between the two selves are too big, then you are in a state of incongruence
- creates feelings of negative self worth, making self-actualisation impossible
Humanistic Approach - client based therapy
this therapy is to help close the gap between the two selves and people with the problems of everyday living.
key features:
- client driven agenda
- focused on the relationship between therapist and client
- everyone can reach their full potential using this therapy
- sessions are led by the client not the therapist
- aimed to achieve congruence within someone
important elements of this therapy
- empathy and ability to understand the other's feelings, expressed or unexpressed
- intuitive, knows body language and could hear from tone of voice and reflect inner essence of what they're saying
he used the word client instead of patient as the word patient implies that something is wrong and it needs to be be cured - emphasised the importance of the individual making their own choices to seek help and overcome difficulties.
Humanistic Approach evaluation - real life app.
P: led to real life applications
E: Rogers developed client centred therapy that is used in education, health and social work systems.
E: demonstrates psych. value + improves people's QoL. clients directing the sessions are more effective in helping them than telling them what to do
L: however, techniques are limited - schizophrenics would find this difficult as they do not have a realistic view of themselves. limits generalisability and reduces soc. value of psych.
Humanistic Approach evaluation - free will
P: believes humans have free will over choices
E: all are able to achieve full potential and are free
E: good; not reduced down to predetermined devices that we have no control over. considers ability to determine own behaviour + takes into account subjective experience --> optimistic alternative
L:when taking a pos. approach, people who do elf-destructing behaviour/not interested in self-actualising are ignored. limited explanation of behaviour
Humanistic Approach evaluation - ethnocentric
P: ethnocentric
E: aspects of this approach is associated with individualistic cultures in the western world
E: difficult to generalise - collectivist cultures would reject this as they emphasise the need for interdependence - cannot identify with ideals of humanistic psychology
L: claims are culturally biased
Humanistic Approach evaluation - hard to test scientifically
P: concepts are hard to test scientifically
E: congruence and self-actualisation are vague and the methods used to test this don't produce objective data (unstructured interviews)
E: methods are subjective and open to bias; don't show cause and effect therefore lack of empirical evidence to support approach
L: adds little in increasing credibility of psychology as a science
Origins of Psychology - Wundt
Wundt opened the first lab dedicated to psychology in Germany
- father of psychology
- focusing on controlled research
- believed in studying behaviour that could be controlled in experimental conditions e.g standardised instructions allowing research to be replicated
Origins of Psychology - structuralism
approach used by Wundt involving breaking down conscious thoughts into their most basic elements.
Origins of Psychology - introspection
method used by Wundt whereby individuals examine their own mental and emotional state and break them, down into basic structures of thoughts, images, and sensations. also known as experimental self-observation
- involves training people to analyse the content of their thoughts.
Origins of Psychology - emergence of psychology (WPBCHBS)
1879:
first lab dedicated to psychological study opened by Wundt. his aim was to study the structure of the mind by breaking down behaviours into their basic elements = structuralism
used a method called introspection
seen as scientific progress, first of its kind + still used today to gain access to cognitive processes
early 1900s:
psychodynamic approach was discovered by Freud who argued that the physical and psychological problems could be explained by conflicts within the mind.
unconscious mind affected behaviour
1913:
value of introspection was questioned because it was too subjective --> shifted to a more scientific approach called the Behaviourist approach
more objective therefore more scientific
the focus of inner mental processes were lessened until the emergence of the cognitive approach!!
- focused on the inner mental processes e.g thoughts and how they influence behaviour (very scientific)
1950s:
humanistic approach
1960s
biological approach
- due to advances in tech, more understanding of brain and biological processes and how these go on and influence behaviour e.g hormones and genes
brain scanning and still exp. method still playing a key role
1960 onwards:
SLT
Origins of Psychology - ways of studying each approach
BIOLOGICAL:
- animal studies
- twin/family studies
- cases studies
- scanning techniques
BEHAVIOURIST:
- lab experiments
- animal studies
SLT:
- lab experiments
PSYCHODYNAMIC
- unstructured interviews
- case studies
COGNITIVE
- brain imaging
- case studies
- lab experiments
HUMANISTIC
- unstructured interviews
Origins of Psychology - methods used AO3 : behaviourist
LAB
(+) highly controlled
- all extraneous variables are controlled so you can confidently say that the results drawn are accurate and reliable
- can establish a cause and effect relationship
- able to replicate and test for validity
(+) focuses on observable behaviour
- scientific + empirical evidence therefore producing quantitative data which is easier to analyse and draw conclusions from
(-) unrealistic environment
- low eco val; does not reflect irl situations so behaviour may not be true to how one would act irl
- results can't be accurately drawn or confidently used to explain behaviour
(-) artificial task
- low mundane realism; not reflective therefore cannot generalise/ establish behaviour irl outside a lab
ANIMAL STUDIES
(+) better than human studies
allows us to stud concepts that may be too unethical to study on humans
- improves understanding of behaviour in humans
(-) can't generalise; humans more complex e.g social norms and morality that affect how we behave
- laws + principles derived from these
- exps might apply more to animals than humans
(anthropomorphism)
Origins of Psychology - methods used AO3 : cognitive
LAB
(+) highly controlled
high confidence in the results being due to the manipulation of the IV and not other variables
- can replicate and test for reliability and validity
(-) unrealistic
not reflective of irl exp, so low eco val + risk of ppts displaying demand characteristics
(-) artificial tasks
- not reflective, low mundane realism
CASE STUDIES
(+) can study rare conditions
provide insight to the working of some mental processes
- can study cases that could not be produced experimentally because of ethical and practical reasons
(-) can't generalise
- small sample as results are unique to individual
BRAIN IMAGING
(+) able to map brain areas to cognitive function
- scientific methods can increase understanding of the brain's influence on behaviour
- provides objective data that can be replicated
Origins of Psychology - methods used AO3 : psychodynamic
CASE STUDIES
(-) mainly Austrian
- samples used in case studies are mainly Austrian so the findings lack population validity and are therefore difficult to generalise to other cultures
UNSTRUCTURED INTERVIEWS
(+) detailed qualitative
- allows us to understand individual exp. more
(-) impossible to replicate
- findings and interpretations are subjective and may be influenced by researcher bias as they tend to interpret data in a way that supports their theory
- suffers from social desirability bias too
Origins of Psychology - methods used AO3 : biological
SCANNING TECHNIQUES
(+) scientific methods
- improve understanding of brain influence on behaviour
- objective data which can be replicated and peer-reviewed
ANIMAL STUDIES
(+) allows us to study concepts that may be too unethical on humans
(-) humans much more complex
TWIN STUDIES
(-) meta-analysis = method flaws
- may include poorly controlled and biased studies that affect the internal validity of the findings and conclusions
(-) hard to distinguish between nature and nurture
- comparing behaviour makes this difficult
- twins share same environment and are treated similarly which can affect behaviour.
CASE STUDIES
e.g Phineas Gage
(+) allows us to study more rare conditions and give insight into how something works when it is functioning correctly e.g brain damage on personality
(+) allows us to study cases that could not be produced experimentally because of ethical reasons
(-) small sample, can't generalise
- findings unique to individual
(-) little control over number of variables
- difficult to confidently establish any causal relationships between variables
Origins of Psychology - methods used AO3 : social learning theory
LAB
(+) highly controlled (you know the rest its been typed)
(-) BOBO DOLL STUDY - not reflective of irl
- displayed demand characteristics eg may have thought they are expected to behave that way and not their true behaviour\
Origins of Psychology - methods used AO3 : humanistic
UNSTRUCTURED INTERVIEWS
(+) detailed qualitative data
- better understand individual exp.
(-) impossible to replicate
- influenced by researcher bias as interpretation is subjective to them
Comparison of approaches: topics to see overlap and differences
determinism (and its different types)
nature vs nurture
reductionist vs holistic
scientific and research methods used e.g lab studies
treatments of disorders e.g types of therapies
idiographic vs nomothetic