Module 4: Categorical Syllogisms

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/57

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:09 PM on 6/18/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

58 Terms

1
New cards

Categorical Proposition

A statement that asserts a relationship between classes or categories using a subject term and a predicate term. Example: 'All dogs are mammals.'

2
New cards

Categorical Syllogism

A deductive argument consisting of three categorical propositions: two premises and one conclusion, containing exactly three terms. Example: 'All mammals are warm-blooded…'

3
New cards

Major Term

The predicate of the conclusion in a categorical syllogism. Example: in a conclusion, mammals.

4
New cards

Minor Term

The subject of the conclusion in a categorical syllogism. Example: poodles.

5
New cards

Middle Term

The term appearing in both premises but not in the conclusion; it links the other terms. Example: dogs.

6
New cards

Major Premise

The premise containing the major term.

7
New cards

Minor Premise

The premise containing the minor term.

8
New cards

Standard-Form Categorical Syllogism

A categorical syllogism arranged in standard order.

9
New cards

Mood

The pattern of proposition types (A, E, I, O) in a syllogism.

10
New cards

Figure

The arrangement of the middle term within the premises.

11
New cards

First Figure

Middle term is subject of the major premise and predicate of the minor premise.

12
New cards

Second Figure

Middle term is the predicate in both premises.

13
New cards

Third Figure

Middle term is the subject in both premises.

14
New cards

Fourth Figure

Middle term is predicate of major premise and subject of minor premise.

15
New cards

Validity

An argument where it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.

16
New cards

Invalidity

An argument that fails to guarantee its conclusion.

17
New cards

Venn Diagram

A diagram using overlapping circles to represent classes and test validity.

18
New cards

Class

A collection of things sharing a common characteristic.

19
New cards

Shading

Indicates a region contains no members.

20
New cards

X Marking

Indicates at least one member exists.

21
New cards

Existential Import

The assumption that a class actually contains at least one member.

22
New cards

Aristotelian Interpretation

Assumes universal statements have existential import.

23
New cards

Boolean Interpretation

Does not assume existential import for universal propositions.

24
New cards

Universal Proposition

A proposition about all members of a class.

25
New cards

Particular Proposition

A proposition about some members of a class.

26
New cards

Rule of the Middle Term

The middle term must be distributed at least once.

27
New cards

Undistributed Middle

Fallacy where the middle term is not distributed in either premise.

28
New cards

Rule of the Major Term

A distributed major term in the conclusion must be distributed in its premise.

29
New cards

Illicit Major

Fallacy where the major term is distributed only in the conclusion.

30
New cards

Rule of the Minor Term

A distributed minor term in the conclusion must be distributed in its premise.

31
New cards

Illicit Minor

Fallacy where the minor term is distributed only in the conclusion.

32
New cards

Rule Against Two Negative Premises

A valid syllogism cannot contain two negative premises.

33
New cards

Exclusive Premises Fallacy

Fallacy caused by two negative premises.

34
New cards

Rule Requiring a Negative Premise for a Negative Conclusion

A negative conclusion requires exactly one negative premise.

35
New cards

Affirmative Premises with Negative Conclusion

Fallacy of drawing a negative conclusion from affirmative premises.

36
New cards

Negative Premise with Affirmative Conclusion

Fallacy of drawing an affirmative conclusion from a negative premise.

37
New cards

Rule Against Two Particular Premises

A valid syllogism cannot have two particular premises.

38
New cards

Two Particular Premises Fallacy

Fallacy resulting from two particular premises.

39
New cards

Existential Fallacy

Drawing a particular conclusion from universal premises under Boolean interpretation.

40
New cards

Distribution

A term is distributed when it refers to all members of a class.

41
New cards

Reduction Technique

A method used to simplify an argument to its essential terms.

42
New cards

Synonymous Expressions

Different expressions with the same meaning.

43
New cards

Nonstandard Argument

An argument not initially in standard syllogistic form.

44
New cards

Ordinary Language Argument

An argument expressed in everyday language.

45
New cards

Translation

Converting ordinary language into standard-form categorical propositions.

46
New cards

Standardization

Rewriting an argument for formal logical analysis.

47
New cards

Categorical Translation Rules

Guidelines for converting statements into A, E, I, or O propositions.

48
New cards

Quantifier

A word such as all, no, some, many, most, few indicating quantity.

49
New cards

Enthymeme

An argument with a missing premise or conclusion.

50
New cards

Suppressed Premise

A premise that is not explicitly stated.

51
New cards

Suppressed Conclusion

A conclusion that is implied but not stated.

52
New cards

Reconstructing an Enthymeme

Supplying the missing premise or conclusion.

53
New cards

Sorites

A chain argument with more than two premises.

54
New cards

Categorical Sorites

A sorites composed entirely of categorical propositions.

55
New cards

Polysyllogism

A series of connected syllogisms.

56
New cards

Chain Reasoning

Reasoning linked through a sequence of logical steps.

57
New cards

Testing a Sorites

Examining component syllogisms to check validity.

58
New cards

Conclusion of a Sorites

The final statement reached from the chain of premises.