Deductive and Inductive Reasoning, Patterns of Development, and Logical Fallacies

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
linked notesView linked note
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/19

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

These flashcards cover key terms and concepts related to deductive and inductive reasoning, patterns of development in writing, and various logical fallacies relevant to the upcoming quiz.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

20 Terms

1
New cards

Deductive Reasoning

A method of reasoning from the general to the specific; if all premises are true, the conclusion must be true.

2
New cards

Syllogism

The simplest form of deductive reasoning consisting of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion.

3
New cards

Major Premise

A general statement that serves as a foundation for deductive reasoning.

4
New cards

Minor Premise

A specific statement that relates to the major premise.

5
New cards

Conclusion

The final statement in a syllogism that logically follows from the premises.

6
New cards

Inductive Reasoning

A method of reasoning that moves from specific evidence to a general conclusion.

7
New cards

Premises

Statements that provide the foundation for an argument; can be major or minor.

8
New cards

Logical Fallacy

An error in reasoning that makes an argument invalid or weak.

9
New cards

Bandwagon / Ad Populum

A fallacy that argues a claim is true because many people believe it.

10
New cards

Fallacy of Accuracy

Occurs when the information is wrong or misleading.

11
New cards

Fallacy of Insufficiency

Occurs when evidence is not enough to support a claim.

12
New cards

Straw Man Fallacy

Misrepresenting an opponent’s argument to make it easier to attack.

13
New cards

Faulty Analogy

Making a comparison between two things that are not truly alike.

14
New cards

Circular Reasoning

An argument that assumes the truth of its conclusion within its premise.

15
New cards

Ad Hominem

A fallacy that attacks the person making an argument rather than the argument itself.

16
New cards

Begging the Question

A fallacy where the premise assumes the conclusion is true.

17
New cards

Appeal to False Authority

Arguing that a claim is true based on the opinion of someone who is not an expert in that field.

18
New cards

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

A fallacy of faulty cause-and-effect reasoning.

19
New cards

Hasty Generalization

Drawing a conclusion based on insufficient evidence.

20
New cards

Slippery Slope

Arguing that one event will lead to a chain of negative outcomes.