1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
concern of criminal law
with public wrongs, even if they occur in private
defines what the state regards as intolerable deviance
where summary offences are heardd
in lower provincial courts by a judge alone
section 553 of the code
lists the summary charges that fall under the absolute jurisdiction of the provincial court
indictable offences options
individuals charges with indictable offences often have the option of having their case heard before a:
provincial court judge,
a superior court judge, or
a super court judge and jury
offences under section 469
require a superior court judge and jury
section 21
lays out the various ways that a person can be held liable for criminal offending
Strict liability
Crown needs to prove an objective intent, then a reverse onus where the accused must then show he had no intent to commit the crime or exercised due diligence
absolute liability
intent is irrelevant
section 35
self-defence and defence of property
charge approval
the first step in proceeding with charges recommended by a policing agency. the respective crown council office will need to decide whether to approve, amend, or drop charges after conducting an initial assessment of the evidence
s.17
provides the conditions under which the defence of duress is available
necessity
a defence in which the defendant claims a lack of criminal responsibility for a criminal act owing to the fact that, because of an imminent threat, they had no choice but to commit the act
s.33.1 changes
integrated the new language, if a person departed markedly from the expected care in that consuming the intoxicating substances could cause the extreme intoxication, they will not likely be able to successfully rely on this defence.
mistake of fact
defence arising from an honest but mistaken belief about one of the elements of the offence committed
s.273.1
outlines the meaning of consent
s.265(3)(c)
requires both a dishonest act and a deprivation
s.273.1(1)
has never required an analysis of the risks or consequences caused by unwanted touching