- David Oakes was charged with possession of drugs, and possession of intent to traffic. At the time of the trial, a person charged with drug possession was automatically charged with possession with the intent to traffic
- If a person was found guilty of possession of drugs, s.8 of the National Crime Agency (NCA) placed the duty/responsibility on the person to prove that there was no intent to traffic and if they could not prove lack of intent, they would automatically be found guilty of the charge.
- Oakes challenged this section of the NCA as an infringement (harm/violation) of his 11(d) Charter rights
The SCC found that s. 8 of the NCA (above) did violate s.11(d) of the CCRF (innocent until proven guilty)
- Therefore the courts had to consider if the infringement was justified under s.1 (!! S.l applies in cases where a Charter infringement is being argued !!)