1/15
Practice flashcards covering the clinical implications, statistical prevalence, and research studies regarding the relationship between third molars and dental crowding as discussed in the lecture notes.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Lower Third Molar Retention Prevalence
According to Björk, 45% of the population will have a retained third molar.
Sabino, Selero, and Furfaro Study
An epidemiological study that found lower third molars to have the highest incidence of retention: piece 38 (3MII) at 33.6% and piece 48 (3MID) at 32.4%Base.
Vego
A researcher who demonstrated that the loss of the arch perimeter averaged 0.8mm more in cases with the third molar than in cases where it was congenitally absent.
Schullof
Proposed that if the distance between the ramus and the second lower molar is known, the probability of retention can be determined.
Computerized Prediction Error
The margin of error for computerized growth prediction methods when estimating available space for molars is approximately 2.8mm.
Kaplan
Argued that the presence of lower third molars does not seem to produce a higher degree of anteroinferior crowding or relapse compared to cases of agenesis.
Ricketts' Rule of Eruption
Based on a study of 100 skeletons, Ricketts concluded that if half of the lower third molar is hidden behind the ramus, there is a 50% probability of eruption.
Point Xi
The center of the ramus, used by Turley as a reference point to measure the distance to the distal face of the second molar to evaluate available space.
Turley's Space Distances
Determined average available space distances: 21mm for retained molars, 25mm for marginal molars, and 30mm for those erupted in occlusion.
Seiso's Gender Measurements
Found that males and females require 27.5mm and 23.6mm respectively from Xi to the distal of the second lower molar.
Germectomy
A prophylactic procedure, often performed between the ages of 13 and 22, used to prevent anterior crowding by removing the third molar germ.
Anderson and Burlington Growth Center Study
Determined the probability of losing the second lower molar is 10% in relation to mandibular growth.
Slodov's Contraindications
Listing situations where repositioning a third molar is contraindicated: lack of an antagonist, malformed tooth, size extremes (too large or small), and a tendency toward an open bite.
Richardson's Agenesis Ratio
Reported that the ratio of women to men with congenitally absent third molars is 3:2.
Laskin's Survey
A 1971 survey of over 600 orthodontists and 700 maxillofacial surgeons where 65% believed third molars produce crowding in anteroinferior incisors.
Carbonell, O. Survey
A provincial survey of orthodontists where 74% agreed that the third molar produces crowding in the anteroinferior sector.