1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Easton’s policymaking system model
A framework that describes the process of policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation, emphasizing the interactions among various actors and institutions involved in governance.
Inputs
Demands:
Solve specific problems
Work toward general social aims
Support:
Effectiveness
Legitimacy
Policy Venues
Institutional locations with decision-making power
“gatekeepers” of our political system
They determine who can participate, when, and how
Executive, Legislative, Judicial Branches
Domestic Policy Types
Distributive Policy:
Policies that allocate public resources (funding, services, or benefits) to specific groups or communities without taking from others.
Ex: Infrastructure spending
Regulatory Policy:
Policies that set rules, restrictions, or standards to regulate individuals, businesses, or industries to protect public interest.
Ex: Environmental laws, seatbelt law
Redistributive Policy:
Policies that reallocate resources (usually through taxation) from one group to another, typically to address economic inequality.
Ex: Welfare programs
Domestic Dedistributive Policy:
Policies that reduce government redistribution efforts, often by cutting social programs or reducing government intervention.
Ex: Cutting welfare programs
Foreign Policy Types
Foreign Strategic Policy:
Policies guiding international relations and national security.
Foreign Structural Policy:
Policies addressing global economic structures and institutions.
Foreign Crisis Policy:
Policies designed to respond to international emergencies and conflicts.
The Policymaking Environment
The Structural Environment:
The basic features that make up the American
political landscape (e.g., federalism, separation of
powers, checks and balance
The Social Environment:
Demographics
The Political Environment:
Political trends and overall partisan composition
The Economic Environment:
The relative state of the economy at any point in time
Policy and Public Policy
Policy:
A relatively stable, purposive course of action followed by an actor or set of actors in dealing with a problem or matter of concern
Public Policy
Policies produced by government actors, agencies, and institutions
Is goal-oriented
Consists of patterns of actions taken across time
Created in response to demand
The Stages Framework
In public policy, the STAGES framework can be useful for understanding how policymakers, organizations, and societies evolve in their thinking and approach to governance.
Issue Identification (Initiation and Problem Definition):
Issue initiation:
Process through which an issue goes from being a private trouble to a public problem
Heightening “concern” within society
Problem definition:
Process through which we assign meaning or understanding to issues or problems
Interaction between several forces
The objective nature of the problem
Perceived seriousness of the problem
Mobilization of political support
Describes, recommends, and persuades
Agenda setting (define the agenda)
The agenda
The demands that policymakers choose to or feel compelled to act on at a given time
Found at all levels and in all branches of government
Achieving agenda status is extraordinarily difficult and requires the convergence of a plethora of forces
Policy Formulation and Adoption
Policy formulation:
The actual design of legislation
Proposals can come from many sources
Policy diffusion
Policy adoption:
Action on a preferred
policy alternative
The decision making
stage
Policy Implementation
Encompasses whatever is done to carry a law into effect, to apply it to the target population, and to achieve its goals
Government agencies or bureaucracies
Not an a-political process
Conflict bleeds into implementation stage
Policy Evaluation
Concerned with trying to determine the effects or consequences of actual public policies
Assessment, estimation, or appraisal
Can occur at any time during the policy process
Politics is again ever-present
Credibility of findings often disputed
How does political conflict differ from an intercollegiate debate?:
Political conflict is not like an intercollegiate debate in which the opponents agree in advance on a definition of issues. As a matter of fact, the definition of alternatives is the supreme instrument of political power, the antagonists can rarely agree on what the issues are because power is involved in the definition.
Issues vs. Problems
Issues:
Need to enter the public consciousness
Various mechanism can bring issues to attention
Problems:
A condition or situation (an
issue) that produces needs or
dissatisfaction among people
and for which relief or redress
by governmental action is
sought
An “issue” does not
become a “problem”
unless it is defined as such
Problem Definition
The process through which we assign meaning to conditions
“Issue” does not become a “problem” unless it is defined as such
Features
Problem must be defined as being appropriate for government action
Agenda setting or denial
Bottom-up or top-down
Definitions can change as conditions and values change
Problem ownership
Communicates a story with a clear beginning, middle, and end
Recurrent Categories of definitional claims
Severity
Incidence
Novelty
Proximity
Crisis
Characteristics of the problem population
Ends-means orientation
Nature of the solution
Causation
Severity
Severity is defined in terms of the scope, scale, time, and consequences of the problem
Incidence
The measure of who is affected by the issue
and to what extent
NOVELTY
“Novel” issues are characterized as unprecedented
PROXIMITY
Issue that hit close to home and are of personal relevancy. If the case is made successfully, the audience will appear concerned and may express them politically
Crisis
Involves the severity of a situation where an action is overdue and dire circumstances exist
Causation
Figuring out where a problem comes from, who or what is responsible, and how to respond. It involves deciding if the issue is caused by individuals or larger systems, whether it was intentional or accidental, and if blame should be assign
Characteristics of the Problem Population
The power to frame a certain population to achieve certain sociopolitical perceptions
Ends-Means Orientation
How policy issues are framed in terms of
desired outcomes and how to achieve them
Ends-oriented definitional claims focus on goals that the policy is supposed to achieve
Means-oriented definitional claims focus on the specific ways to address the problem
Nature of the Solution
Agreed upon, available, acceptable, and affordable:
Agreed upon: Solutions can sort of define the problem
Available: do we even have the means/ability?
Acceptable: "standard codes of behavior"
Affordability: Is this plausible viable and accessible?
Agenda Setting
The process through which an issue comes to be recognized as a public problem and placed on the “agenda” of a decision making body
Agenda types:
Public
The set of concerns society cares about
Formal or institutional
The set of items government is considering addressing
Formula for an unstable society?
Big gap between public and formal agenda
Agenda Setting Assumptions
Mobilization of bias favors the status quo
Demands are parallel, processing is serial
Certain items recur
New issues make policymakers uncomfortable
Possibility of “pseudo-agenda status