1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Private Cost:
The cost to producers.
Labor, materials, energy, equipment.
Incurred privately by the producer
Social Cost:
Private cost + the cost borne by everyone else
Pollution, health damage, climate impact.
The Environment as Source and Sink
Source:
The environment supplies raw materials for production (timber, minerals, fossil fuels, clean water).
Overusing a source causes resource degradation.
We need to use them at an efficient rate.
Sink:
The environment absorbs waste from production and consumption - CO2, garbage, chemical runoff.
Overusing a sink causes pollution.
Negative Externality (definition + examples)
Harmful side effects
Pollution, noise, congestion.
Positive Externality (definition + examples)
Beneficial side effect
Vaccinations, education, research & development.
What are 2 factors that makes something a public good? (Name and define them)
(Also name an example)
Non-excludable:
You can’t stop someone from benefiting, even if they don’t pay for it.
Non-rival:
One person using it doesn’t reduce how much is available for anyone else.
Example:
Public defense is both non-excludable and non-rival. Everyone benefits from it, and once it is paid for, everyone benefits the same.
Social cost equation
Social cost = private cost + external cost
Define what a public good is:
For everyone.
Non-rival.
Non-excludable.
What is one of the biggest issues with public goods (why are they not offered as much?)
Free riders: get the benefits but do not pay for them.
People like to benefit but do not like to pay.
Excludable =
Buying a pizza, you exclude others from consuming said pizza. Property rights.
You can exclude someone from it.
Tragedy of the Commons
Basically, it's a shared resource, and we can’t really limit people on it.
Can’t limit one country to only emit X amount of pollution.
Good is non-excludable but not non-rival. As in, there is a limit to how many people can use it. There is a limited resource.
Why can the market just fix it?
The price of external costs is not captured, so the market on paper looks like it is working, but it is not because the external cost is not captured.
No one wants to pay.
Rival | Non-rival | |
Excludable | Private goods (normal markets, food, cars, clothes). | Club goods (not related to climate. Ex: cable, satellite) |
Non excludable | Open access goods | Public Goods |
Efficiency defined:
An outcome is efficient when total net benefits to society are as large as possible - when we can’t make anyone better off without making someone else worse.
Maximizing the total net benefit. Even if it hurts some people.
Finding the level of pollution reduction where the benefits of reducing it further no longer outweigh the costs.
Max benefit > Max cost
Means:
Each additional unit of reduction adds more benefit than it costs - total net benefit is still rising (we can benefit more).
Max benefit < Max cost
Means:
Each additional unit costs more than it is worth - total net benefit starts falling (adding more will be more harmful than good).
The ideal is when?
Marginal Benefits = Marginal Cost
Marginal (Define)
Change from ONE more unit.
The cost or benefit of reducing pollution by just one more ton.
“Is adding one more unit worth it?”
Marginal cost curve of reduction
Rises or falls?
Define
Rises
The first unit to cut is cheap; it gets more expensive for more units.
Marginal benefit of reduction
Rises or falls?
Define
Falls
The first bit of cleanup avoids the worst damage. Each additional ton avoided provides a smaller benefit than the one before.
Benefits are large initially, but then benefits become smaller and smaller.
What is an externality?
An externality is a cost (or benefit) of an economic activity that falls on someone who did not choose to be part of that activity.
Deadweight Loss
Too little control =
Too much control =
Too little control = preventable damage is left on the table (we can still prevent some damage).
Too much control = Cleanup spending exceeds the damage it prevents (more harm than good is being done).
The Ethical Basis of Efficiency
The efficiency standard rests on utilitarian foundations — maximize total net benefits, without regard to who bears the costs.
The Coase Theorem
If property rights are clear and negotiation is costless, parties will bargain to the efficient outcome — regardless of who holds the rights.
However, it is hard to do when it is a large group and a high transaction cost; that is why we turn to regulations instead.
Problems one runs into when facing real-world benefits and costs:
Measuring benefits is hard:
How do you put a value on cleaner air?
Costs are uncertain:
New tech and long time horizons make estimates shaky.
Policies shape the numbers:
Who runs the analysis can influence assumptions used.