Negligence - Cause in Fact

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
0.0(0)
full-widthCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/7

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

8 Terms

1
New cards

“But-for” Test

The defendant’s conduct is a factual cause of the harm if the injury would not have occurred but for the defendant’s act or omission

2
New cards

Multiple tortfeasors

The but-for test may not work when:

  • multiple tortfeasors are involved and it can’t be said that the defendant’s conduct was required to produce the harm;

  • There are multiple possible causes but the plaintiff cannot identify which defendant actually caused the harm;

  • Negligent medical misdiagnosis increased the risk of death, but the plaintiff likely would have died even with a proper diagnosis

3
New cards

Substantial Factor test

  • Used when but-for causation does not wor because two or more defendants caused an indivisible injury

  • Test is whether the defendant’s tortious conduct was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s harm

4
New cards

Concurrent tortfeasors

When tortious acts of 2 or more defendants cause an indivisible injury to the plaintiff, the defendants are jointly and severally liable

5
New cards

Alternative Causation

If plaintiffs harm was caused by

  • a small number of defendants

  • each person’s conduct was tortious

  • all present before court

Court may shift burden of proof to defendant to prove that his conduct was not the cause in fact of the plaintiff’s harm

6
New cards

Acting in Concert

applies when two or more defendants act together under a common plan or design

If any defendant’s tortious act causes harm, all defendants are jointly and severally liable (ex: drag race)

7
New cards

Loss of Chance

applies in medical malpractice when a doctor’s negligent misdiagnosis reduces a patient’s chance of survival

If patient’s pre-negligence chance of survival was below 50%, plaintiff can’t satisfy but-for causation—> in majority of jurisdictions, plaintiff may recover through this doctrine.

Plaintiff can recover [Total wrongful death damages x (% chance of survival before negligence - % after negligence)

8
New cards

Causal Linkage

Even if defendant’s conduct is a but-for cause, liability may be denied if the conduct did not increase the probability of the type of harm that occurred

(wagon mound 1; oil spill - fire was not a forseeable result)