1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
What is the interference hypothesis
Interference from other items causes recall errors
What are the 2 types of interference
Proactive and retroactive
What is proactive interference
Where information stored previously makes it harder to add new information
Proactive interference is interference from ___ onto ____
Old onto new
What is retroactive interference
Where new information coming in overwrites older information in memory
Retroactive interference is interference from ___ onto ____
New onto old
How can you test for proactive interference
Have subjects (S) repeat back short lists of related items that are said by the experimenter (E)
What would an example with 3 lists look like
List 1:
E: chair, soda, rug, painting
S: chair, sofa, rug, painting
List 2:
E: lamp, dresser, desk, bed
S: lamp, dresser, desk, PAINTING
List 3:
E: bookcase, stool, bench, table
S: bookcase, LAMP, SOFA, table
What does the example that tests for proactive interference show
After list 1, we begin to see errors where people erroneously (incorrectly) recall items from earlier lists. Old items are still in memory and are spontaneously recalled, and people can’t keep track of which items belong to which list
How does proactive interference build up
It builds up as similar information must be learned
How does performance improve for proactive interference
When the type of information changes
What does proactive interference suggest
It suggests the value of rotating material across a learning session
How can you test for retroactive interference
Give subjects a set of letters to remember and then have them either count backwards or say the alphabet backwards
What would an example look like for both counting backwards and saying the alphabet backwards
Example 1:
Remember Q W H N
Count backwards from 20
Now recall the set of letters asked to remember
Example 2:
Remember Q W H N
Say the alphabet backwards
Now recall the set of letters asked to remember
What are the results for the test for retroactive interference
Recall is higher after counting than after reciting the alphabet
What can we conclude from these results
New letters seem to interfere more with prior letter memory
Is decay the only way information is lost
No, information can be lost from interference from old information onto new (proactive interference) and from new information onto old (retroactive interference)