1/54
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
Is language a distinctly human trait?
Kanzi (monkey)
prompting what he wants based off a picture board (form of communication)
language is different than an animals communication system
inborn capability for communication
most scientists doubt animals other than humans have a true “language”
many efforts to teach animals language
ASL and other symbolic systems
Washou (monkey produced 100+ signs)
chimps, gorilla, dolphins, parrots…
What is special about language?
language is hierarchically structures
sounds → words → phrases → sentences
this structure is absent in animal communication
discrete units can be recombined to make other utterances
language is productive (generative), infinitely creative
recall chomsky discussion
know all the rules of language and grammar
language is grammatical
rules about “legal” combinations
e.g., order of adjectives…noun location (sensitive to violations)
language is arbitrary
why does “cat” represent a cat?
why subject-verb-object in English?
language is symbolic
represents something (symbol of something else)
language allows us to talk about displaced objects (or hypotheticals)
abstract concepts that you can’t see
humans are the only species that use true language
rule based process
Human Language
can be broken down into a number of levels
phonemes (phonology)
the sounds of language
morphemes (lexical or semantically level)
smallest meaningful language units
content and function morphemes; free and bound morphemes
words (lexical or semantic level)
phrases (syntax)
sentences (syntax and semantics)
discourse (conceptual and belief)
Phonology: Phonemes
different features/characteristics of sounds
voiced or unvoiced
place of articulation (p/b [lips], t/d [tongue behind teeth], k/g [soft palate]…)
manner of production (nasal/air flow m/n)
combine the features to produce many phonemes
only use a few (40) in English… other languages use many more (100+ in some African languages)
San Bushmen people use “clicks”
clicking sounds produced with the tongue or mouth
Speech Perception
not a simple process of “phoneme detection”
no markers at the beginning or end of phonemes (or words)
effect of content and co-articulation (phonemic overlap)
idiosyncratic speech habits
unique production and perception of phonemes
categorical perception
the tendency to hear sounds merely as members of a category
all sounds of a given category sound identical
perceive abrupt transitions between sound categories
Importance of Top-Down Processing
speech recognition programs still quite weak (even Siri)
one reason is humans make use of top-down knowledge to aid speech perception (misheard lyrics)
meaning and segmentation
I scream = Ice Cream
Phoneme Detection
Bat vs Baf vs /b/
Lexical/Semantic Level: Words
how we represent words:
phonographic representation
sound of the word (phonemes)
orthographic representation
spelling of the word
semantic representation
meaning of the word
homophones (and homonyms)
ate/eight, bank/bank, bear/bare, litter/litter
Words
sense
meaning of a word (or phrase)
referent
what the word refers to in the world
much more specific telegraph
generativity of language
critical characteristics, ability to create new words
allows us to deal with/describe novel situations
may lighten the attentional load for new language learners
often created by re-combining or applying function morphemes
rather consistent in how we apply function morphemes
*think of all the new words we have created in the past 100 years
Note on the “rules” of language
many no longer talk about the rules per se
an influence of connectionism/PDP models…
prescriptive rules
how things ought to be done
required, prerequisite
focus for many linguists (and English teachers)
descriptive rules
how things are done
focus for cognitive psychologists and psycholinguists
2 Measures of Knowledge of Language
competence
what you are able to do understand…often under ideal conditions (e.g., formal knowledge of grammar rules, ability to recognize words)
performance
how you actually use language…in more “real world” conditions (e.g., slips of the tongue, spoken language — including grammatical errors)
Language Development
children begin to learn language in utero
recognition of/sensitivity to prosody of mother language
can hear and feel mothers language in utero
infants have preference for mothers voice because they have more experience with it since development in the womb
language skills develop through infancy
vocal play — 16 weeks
babbling with syllable production — 36 weeks (ASL babble)
not accidental, its planned
mirrors sophisticated alternate language skills
recognition of phonemes across infancy at birth (ALL speech sounds in the world — drops at 6 months)
at birth we can recognize all phonemes for every language in the world
come into the world ready to learn any language but eventually that goes away and we only learn the language we are exposed to
first word around 52 weeks
“rules” of language around 3 years
specific patterns of errors
many patterns appear almost universal
underextensions (dog refers to only golden retrievers)
overextensions (dog refers to any animal with 4 legs)
overregularization (add “ed” to make all verbs past tense)
children’s information smart “errors”
role of parent/caregivers — focus on communication vs language
fast mapping (as early as 13 months — full speed by 2 years)
process where children acquire words, syntax, vocabulary very quickly
50 words by 1 year, 1000 words by 3 years, 10000 words by 5 years
Overregularization
of particular interest to psychologists and psycholinguists
human data
for brief period language gets worse
not likely due to imitation
has been used to attack behaviourist (learning) account of language
has been modelled successfully with connectionist/network models
Syntax
grammar
which combination of words are “legal”
syntax
rules governing the sequence of words in a phrase/sentence
the role each word plays in a sentence
verb, nouns, adjectives, etc
syntax does not equal meaning
sentences can be syntactically correct but meaningless
Levels of Language
deep structure vs surface structure
deep structure = intended meaning
surface structure = words and phrases used
the boy threw the ball
the ball was thrown by the boy
landing places can be dangerous
is this from a pilots perspective that the act of landing a plane can be dangerous or is it from the perspective of someone else saying that planes that are landing can be dangerous
Chomsky said there are specific rules that allow us to move between the levels (transformational grammar)
Decoding Language
detecting ambiguity
detect phrase structure (active vs passive)
detect function words or function morphemes
detect “minimal attachment” (drop the “who”, “which”, “that”)
focus on what is appropriate in the sentence
Other Cues to Decoding Language
Prosody
the rise and fall of speech intonation and the pattern of pauses
can give us cues as to the intent of the utterance
“oh, isn’t that nice” (different meanings based on intonation)
these cues missing in email/text and often result in misinterpretation of statements
development of emoticons
pragmatics
knowledge about how language is normally used (what we say is not always what we mean)
Grice’s Conversational maxims/”rules”
turn-taking…(develops very early on in life — we know to take turns in conversation)
cooperative exchange
direct vs indirect
relevance to the interaction
social roles and settings influence pragmatics
superior vs peers; gender, cultural differences (eye contact)
Bilingualism
recall reference to “arbitrary” features of language
early human development advantage…(early infancy; and again before 10 years)
developmental evidence for bilingual children having greater working memory, executive functioning skills, and problem-solving skills
strength in perspective-taking and negotiation skills because we have another mental perspective with another language
adult hope
we can “gain” with “re-educating” neural circuits, learning second and third languages
Linguistic Relativity
linguistic determinism or linguistic relativity (Benjamin Whorf)
the language we use determines/affects how we perceive and think about the world
multiple languages = multiple modes of thought
some experimental evidence to support “more language = more distinctions”
languages differ in how to describe events (so and so made a mistake vs mistakes were made)
interactive model: language shapes cognition and cognition shapes language but ultimately, it’s your experience (top-down) that is key…
Organization of Language
language relies on well-defined patterns
patterns in how individual words are used
patterns in how words are put together into phrases
language has a hierarchical structure
Hierarchical Structure
highest level → ideas intended by the speaker or ideas that the listener derives from the output
expressed in sentences
Sentences
coherant sequences of words that express the speaker’s intended meaning
composed of phrases
Phrases
composed of words
Words
composed of morphemes
Morphemes
the smallest language units that carry meaning
bound or free
made up of phonemes
Bound Morphemes
add information crucial for interpretation
-ed
-s
-ing
Free Morphemes
can stand alone and refer to particular objects, ideas, or actions
sun
walk
on
the
happy
well
Phonemes
smallest units of sound that serve to distinguish words in a language
Word’s Sounds
sequence of phonemes that make up the word
Orthography
sequence of letters that spell the word
Generativity
the trait that enables someone to combine and recombine basic units to create new and more complex entities
linguistic rules are generative because they enable a person to combine and recombine a limited set of words to produce a vast number of sentences
new words are created all the time
Syntax
rules governing the sequences and combinations of words in the formation of phrases and sentences
Phrase-Structure Rules
constraints that govern what elements must be contained within a phrase and what the sequence of those elements must be
Tree Structure
a style of depiction often used to indicate hierarchical relationships, such as the relationships among the words in a phrase or sentence
Prescriptive Rules
rules describing how things are supposed to be instead of how they are (normative rules)
we should be skeptical of these rules because they are changing with the passage of time (thou and ye are no longer used but they used to be the only acceptable way of speaking)
Descriptive Rules
rules that simply describe the regularities in a pattern of observations with no commentary on whether the pattern is proper, correct or desirable
Function of Phrase Structure
people have somehow internalized these rules and obey them in their use of and also their judgement about language
Extralinguistic Context
the social and physical setting in which an utterance is encountered
cues within this setting usually guide the interpretation of the utterance
Prosody
the pattern of pauses and pitch changes that characterize speech production
can be used to emphasize the elements of a spoken sentence, to highlight the sentence’s intended structure, or to signal the difference between a question and an assertion
guides understanding
can clarify a sentence
Pragmatic Rules
principles describing how language is ordinarily used
listeners rely on these principles to guide their interpretation of what they hear
Maxim of relation
specifies that a speaker shouldn’t be more informative than is necessary
Common Ground
set of beliefs and assumptions shared by conversational partners
speakers and listeners count on this shared knowledge as a basis for making inferences about points not explicitly mentioned in the conversation and also as a basis for interpreting elements of the conversation that would otherwise be unclear or ambiguous
Aphasia
disruption of language caused by damage to specific parts of the brain
humans have a considerable amount of neural tissue that is specialized for language
damage to this tissue can disrupt language understanding language production or both
Broca’s Area
an area in the left frontal lobe of the brain
damage here causes nonfluent aphasia
Nonfluent Aphasia
a disruption of language in which a person loses the ability to speak or write with any fluency
can understand language they hear but cannot write or speak properly (speech is labored and fragmented)
in extreme cases, patients can’t utter any words at all
Wernicke’s Area
an area in the temporal lobe of the brain where the temporal and parietal lobes meet
damage here causes fluent aphasia
Fluent Aphasia
disruption of language in which afflicted individuals are able to produce speech but the speech is not meaningful and the individuals are not able to understand what is said to them
patients can talk freely but they say very little (don’t make any sense) — nonsense speech
Biology of Language Learning
by 3 or 4 years of age almost every child is able to converse at a reasonable level
Specific-Language Impairment (SLI)
a disorder in which individuals seem to have normal intelligence but experience problems in learning the rules of language
Sign Language
children can learn language even if their communication with adults is strictly limited
evidence comes from deaf children who have no opportunity to learn sign language — these children invent their own gestural language (home sign) and teach it to others
Overregularization Error
error in which a person produces a form that is consistent with a broad pattern, even though that pattern does not apply to the current utterance
foots instead of feet
runned instead of ran
error in which someone perceives or remembers a word or event as being closer to the norm than it really is
misspelled words read correctly
children are very sensitive to patterns in the language that they’re learning and they’re able to figure out the principles that govern these patterns
children rely on prosody as clues to syntax so adults often exaggerate these when speaking to children to help them
Animal Language
the greatest success in teaching animals language involves animals that are genetically very similar to humans
Kanzi learned to communicate with extensive training but not to a human level (skills well below the average 3-4 year old human with no explicit training)
Wolf Children
children could be rehabilitated but could not learn language although some learned to speak a few words
Linguistic Relativity
the proposal that the language people speak shapes their thought, because the structure and vocabulary of their language create certain ways of thinking about the world
notion that language shapes thought is generally attributed to anthropologist Benjamin Lee Whorf
Whorfian Hypothesis
the language you speak forces you into certain modes of thought
people who speak different languages inevitably think differently (linguistic relativity)
Bilingualism
children raised in bilingual homes generally learn both languages quickly and well
early in development they tend to have smaller vocabularies than monolingual children but they soon catch up
children raised bilingually might develop certain skills that help them avoid confusing their 2 languages so that they develop a skill of turning off their French-based habits in a certain environment so they can speak uncompromised English and the same for English in other environments
might end up better at switching between competing tasks or avoiding various types of distraction