1/27
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
convenience sample
subjects were easy to gather, not a valid sample method
voluntary sample
subjects chose to participate, not a valid sample method
simple random sample
SRS
everyone in the population has an equal chance at being included in the sample
stratified random sample
populations is categorized, subjects are randomly selected proportionally to sample size
cluster sample
subjects are geographically close
multi-stage sample
cluster sampling on multiple stages
systematic sample
every “kth” individual is selected
bias
systematically (not necessarily intentional) misrepresenting the populations
publication bias
researchers only post interesting studies
Hawthorne effect
people act differently when they know they are being monitored
nonresponse bias
subjects selected to be in the sample didn’t participate
response bias
responses are influenced by misworded questions
selection bias
a portion of the population is left out of the sample, often accidental
observational studies
whatever happens, happens, no treatments
retrospective
look into the past to compare similarities and differences
prospective
select individuals and observe them over time
experiments
researchers can administer treatments and observe what happens
control
all non tested variables are constant
randomization
the treatments are assigned to subjects in the experiment randomly to filter out unknown variables
replication
by repeating the experiment, trends will become more apparent
control group
a group that doesn’t receive treatment, determines effectiveness of the treatment, sometimes receives a placebo treatment
completely randomized design
treatments are randomly assigned to subjects, not ideal
blocking
categorize the population, run multiple completely randomized designs
matched pairs
matching 2 subjects that are similar as possible, one gets treatment, one is control
placebo
people that aren’t receiving treatment but think they are may react like they received treatment
blinding
participants don’t know who is receiving treatment
double blind
both subjects and evaluators are blind
single blind
only evaluators are blind or only subjects are blind