1/62
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Labor force participation rates over the life course
Labor force participation: Proportion of population working or active looking for work
LFP increases during adolescence and adulthood when people get out of college and start working
Gradually decreases especially amongst the oldest old because of health complications, taking care of a loved one, etc.
High prime for working ages (25-54), dipping for younger teens (16-24) due to schooling, and sharply decline for older adults (65+) as they retire
Older adults’ labor force participation rates over time
Majority of older adults 65+ (particularly men) had to work in the 50s up until the 70s because there wasn’t the expansion of SS yet
In the 70s though after SS expansion, LFP in men plummeted where as women have been slightly increasing
Then in the 90s, there was the gradual increase of LFP in the 90s because of Reagan’s tax policies that increased the need to work, favoring the high-end of the income proportion
It hasn’t decreased since the 90s and this is partly because the living expectancy has increased, medicine advancements have gotten better, more jobs matching aging bodies, older adults want to start working again or still want to contribute, or are forced to work because of financial issues
Gender differences in labor force participation
Men disproportionately have a higher LFP than women
Back in the 50s, almost half of men in their 60s were working whereas it was around 10% women
Then LFP in men plummeted at the 70s
Because of the expansion of SS
Then in the 70s, finally older people who wanted to retire, now had that public pension to help them to retire
Gradual increase of LFP again in the 90s
1. More jobs that matched aging bodies
2. Under Reagan: Tax policies that favored high-end of the income proportion
Rising income inequality (haves and have nots)
The need to work increased
3. People are healthier on average today
Want to start working again
Uncompensated labor: If childcare and eldercare were considered, LFP would be drastically higher in women
Years you are working should contribute to your pension but it doesn’t
Retirement
Retirement: Exit from the paid labor force
Bridge job
Bridge jobs: A job (usually part time), that one takes between exiting full time work and retiring completely
From your career job to another job before retirement
Voluntary vs. involuntary retirement
Voluntary: Leave job by choice
Involuntary: Laid off, their health, dying spouse to care for, demoted, given enticing incentive
Ageism (given less desirable tasks, higher salaries for younger people, not aging ready workplaces)
When downsizing, they tend to lay off older workers because they cost more, their health insurance is more
Golden parachute: An agreement between a company and an employee specifying that the employee will receive certain significant benefits if employment is terminated
Severance pay, cash bonuses, stock options, etc.
Phased retirements
Phased retirement: Allows older workers to reduce their responsibilities and ease gradually into full time retirement
A professor with reduced teaching load
A luxury (white-collar) job that ratchets down what you do
Less so for an hourly worker
Gig work
Gig work: Work as an independent contractor or consultant (does not get benefits from employers) and may work for multiple employers
Working for yourself (dog walking), freelance writer, delivery driver, transportation
Problematic for young people but less so for older people
Gives people autonomy but when you’re young, it doesn’t provide you security or a pension
If they start doing this at 60, at least they have all those years of prior work and own a house
Reasons to retire or remain in the labor force
Leisure time
Some may want to work longer because they like their chosen career path
Economic factors
Those lower-income with poor pensions are forced to work longer
Personal preferences
Family-related issues
Health-related issues
Policy factors
Ageism
Economic considerations affecting retirement timing
Some will retire at the time they maximize their benefit
On average, if you retire at 62, your monthly benefit will be $725 compared to $1280 at 70
Incentivizes older adults to continue working
The earlier you retire, the less you get
Encourages people to draw later so the government doesn’t pay them for more years
Minimum age increases in response to population aging
65 → 67
Pension
A retirement plan by employers or the government where they are given a monthly income after retirement
Defined benefit vs. defined contribution plan
Defined benefit (old school): Funded by employers, and provide workers with lifetime annuities based on how long they’ve been with their employer and their final salary
A third of all workers in the 70s
Today, pretty much nothing, and replaced by DC plans
Defined contribution: Tax-deferred savings accounts like 401K plans which provide tax and savings incentives to both employers and employees to set aside money for retirement
The payout is determined by the amount of money contributed to the plan and the rate of return on the money invested over time
The future value at DC accounts, like saving accounts, depends both on fluctuations of the market and the worker’s savvy in investing their funds wisely
Typically offered for white collar jobs
Those financially struggling (paying for food, rent, necessities), don’t have the money to put it away into their retirement accounts
Also don’t have financial literacy
Disparities in who has access to an employer-provided pension
60% young people aren’t covered
If you work for a small business, you won’t get pensions
Higher income → covered more by a workplace retirement plan
Age discrimination in the work place (Roscigno)
Although employers may say they want long-term, experienced, dedicated workers, survey research found that they tend to view older workers as expensive, inflexible, possibly stubborn or forgetful, and bad for the company image
To justify cost-savings for the business
Replacing older workers with younger workers as a cost-savings technique
Raises older adults’ fears and concerns of being unable to pay for their mortgage, children’s college, etc.
Many aging workers have faced insulting jokes, disrespect, patronizing behavior, and assumptions about frailty or ailments
Harassed by supervisors and coworkers, and some were isolated or relegated to less-desirable, sometimes lower-paid positions
Manifested by a culture consumed with “youth”
Older workers often exhibit great job commitment, less turnover, and lower rates of absenteeism than do younger workers
This has resulted in significant job displacement, involuntary exit from the labor market, and downward mobility upon re-employment
Consequently, this results in pension deductions, medical and life insurance sometimes being completely severed, anger, sadness, betrayal
Very difficult to find re-employment, often giving up job searches and retiring altogether
Age discrimination in employment act (ADEA)
A US federal law protecting workers 40 and older from unfair treatment (discrimination) in the workplace, covering hiring, firing, pay, promotions, and benefits
Despite this, there still have been persistent ageist discrimination in workplaces, with many employers still practicing both ageist hiring and firing practices
How couples approach retirement (joint vs. sequential retirement)
Joint retirement: Both spouses/partners choose to retire around the same time
Married women tend to retire slightly younger than men because of caregiving, and the man tends to be 2-3 years older than the woman, then the woman will retire in tandem so they can spend their time together, relocate, etc.
Sequential retirement: One spouse retires first, and the other plans to work for several more years (usually women works longer)
Factors associated with life satisfaction in retirement
Life satisfaction in retirement hinges on health, strong social ties, financial security, purpose, and autonomy
Life satisfaction in retirement may be reduced if one is forced to retire by their company or because of a loss of a loved one
Life satisfaction in retirement may be increased if one has a stable pension to rely on for retirement, comfortably retire from their job that they enjoyed, or are also continuing volunteer work while in retirement
Life satisfaction in retirement may be reduced if one has health problems, is socially isolated, is financially struggling, or struggles to accomplish ADLs
Most retirees sustain busy and active lives and play a productive part in their families and their own communities; some engage in leisure activities for self-fulfillment (shopping, golf, traveling, socializing), others care for their grandchildren
But the low-income elderly must spend all their money on basic necessities; they lack the discretionary income to pursue leisure involvements
Volunteering and its impacts on older adult well-being
Benefits for health and social integration
Be surrounded by purpose
Keeping busy
Age integration (working with younger people)
Continuity theory: Substitution for social roles
Reverse-causation: Not volunteering that makes you healthier, but it’s because of their good health, they are able to volunteer
Is the people who are the most cognitively engaged in the first place the healthiest to volunteer or is it the volunteering that is leading to their sharp cognitive skills?
Fighting stereotypes, showing that older adults can immensely contribute to society
Innovative public-private and community initiatives
Senior corps: Foster grandparent and senior companion programs pay $2.65/hour
Meals on wheels: Delivering meals to older people
Fighting loneliness, being a second eye or ears
Co-housing and villages programs
AmeriCorps: Earmarks (set aside) 10% of slots for persons over age 55
AARP Experience Corps with modest stipends (fixed income) for low-income participants
Former teachers will be tutors
Bereavement
Bereavement: The death of a family member or loved one
Stratified and socially patterned on the basis of age, SES, race, and ethnicity
In some communities, one will experience more bereavement (homicide, police intervention)
Spillover effect of bereaving family members (affecting the grandchildren, nieces, nephews, etc.)
Grief
Grief: The psychological symptoms of sadness, yearning, and loss one feels upon the death
Widowers feel anxious having to sleep alone
Pretty universal although the symptoms vary
Natural part of life that connects us to others
The price we pay for loving
Demonstration that this other person’s life matters
Even though it’s painful, it serves some functions
Sends out signals to the community in how to help that person
Giving that person a break from work
Keep going yet still give people a break
Anticipatory grief
Anticipatory grief: Grieving before the death
Attachment theory as an explanation for grief
Bereavement is painful because it involves the loss of a person to whom we were closely attached
Helps us to understand why loss is so painful and why not all deaths are not equally painful
We don’t deeply mourn the loss of someone if we are not close to them (someone that mistreated us)
Intensity of bereavement is linked to the strength of one’s attachment to the person lost
“Up”: Bereavement from a very close and child-free marriage
A key symptom of grief (in addition to sadness) is “yearning” or the desire to be with or reunite with the deceased
Any separation is painful
Severance of bond is really distressing
Infant from parent, adult from parent, etc.
Continuing bonds can be protective (Klass)
Still thinking about the person, helping them stay attached
Imaginary conversations, think about what their relationship was like, maintain pictures in the house
Links back to continuity theory
The notion that you cannot move on but it is expected, normal, and protective for people
Not normal if they’re not going out their house, developing new friendships, or not eating
Survivors of domestic abuse may still have lingering negative thoughts of the deceased person
“Good death” and its consequences
What constitutes a good death?
Friends and family
Short and painless death
At home
Legacy
Spiritual needs met
“I don’t want to die hooked up to machines”
Breathing tube, feeding tube, ventilators
Palliative care, and a good advanced care planning
Consequences
Reduced trauma for survivors and peace for the dying
Achieving this can be challenging though, hindered by medical barriers, conflicting wishes, and caregiver burden
Traumatizing if a good death was not possible (COVID-19)
Physical, financial, and emotional strain on families
Systemic barriers
Hospice vs. palliative care
Hospice care: Type of care that focuses on soothing your pain and not extending life
Pain relief and palliation
Providing relief, not cure of the disease
Patient is not seeking curative measures or return to the hospital
Hospice care at home and in the hospital
Lot of support for the family (counter to medicalization) by several providers
Aggressive pain, symptom, and quality of life management
Patient has a terminal or untreatable illness with fewer than 6 months to live in the normal course of the disease
Can’t be referred until the doctor lets them know they’re dying
Prevents not availing themselves of the many benefits they need
Cheaper than medically intensive care
Paid for by Medicare
Family-level approach
Bereavement services pre- and post-death
Lingering ties with family after death
Black patients are far less likely to want to receive hospice care
Doctors don’t tell them about hospice care
Assumption if African Americans have not historically received the treatments they want (Syphilis), they think it’s a way to kill them faster
Palliative care: Bigger bucket
You don’t have to be dying, rather more broadly about comfort and emphasizes soothing of pain
Symptom management
Strengths and weaknesses of hospice
Hospice use has escalated over the past two decades, bringing benefits for the dying and their families
Half of decedents today (but just 17% in 1997) received hospice care
Median stay: 24 days
Hospice use linked with
Less patient pain
Greater satisfaction with care
Better mood among patients
Less depression and anxiety among family members, before and after death
Reduced health problems and mortality risk of family members, post-death
Because they have a less stressful process
Because hospice is less medicalized, providers spend more time with the patient
Sitting with the family and patient, talk to the patient about their life
Counter to medicalization
Unmeaningful conversations with doctors, short appointments
Late referrals are the problem, undermining hospice value
If you get referred too late
Referred at point of crisis
Received painful, unnecessary treatment prior to referral
Forced to switch care team shortly before death
Insufficient time to benefit from hospice services
If you get referred much earlier on
Adequate time to adjust to hospice, transition care teams
Hospice staff able to develop relationship with patient and family
Patient able to participate in end-of-life planning
Quality of life enhanced by timely shift from cure to comfort
Medicare hospice benefit
The only way you can get Medicare to pay for your hospice is if your doctors say you have 6 months or less to live, if you want hospice care but not heroic measures (care to cure your illness): “I’m not going to accept breathing tubes or technologically intensive treatments to keep me alive”, and if you sign a statement choosing hospice care
Advance care planning
Advanced Care Planning (ACP): Things you do in advance to plan the care you receive
An integral step toward a “good death”
Living will
Durable power of attorney for health care (DPAHC): Person legally appointed as one’s “proxy” decision maker
Name someone to be your decision maker
If you choose two people, they might disagree
Limits
May not know patient’s wishes
Other family members may disagree with DPAHC’s actions
“Informal” end-of-life planning: Discussions with significant others
Discussions are considered important because
Legally appointed proxies may assume (incorrectly) that they know patient’s beliefs
They may trigger conversations among many family members
Fewer economic or structural barriers to access
Discussions may focus less on specific treatments and more on general values and attitudes which have potentially broad applicability
Helps reduce burden (stressful decision-making by loved ones)
Reasons to do advance care planning
Ensuring that your medical care aligns with your personal values and wishes if you become unable to speak for yourself
A gift to your loved ones, providing clarity and reducing their stress and potential conflict during a crisis
Promotes a better quality of life, prevents unwanted treatments, provides a peace of mind for everyone by documenting wishes for future medical scenarios when you can’t speak for yourself
Living wills (and its limits)
Living will: Written document stating one’s preferences, if one is unable to articulate preferences at decision-making moment
Says what treatment you want (ventilator, feeding tubes, resuscitation)
Limits
Content of document may not apply to patient’s current and specific health care need(s)
Content may be unclear or vague
Document may not be accessible when needed
Family may not know or agree with content
Medical aid-in-dying
Physician prescribes the treatment, patient administers the treatment, physician does not administer the treatment
Contested topics in part because people are unaware of how structured it is
Not euthanasia, but really is the doctor prescribing the medication to the dying person in which they take it out of their own free will to hasten their death
US adults and doctors generally support MAID
Only a handful of states that aren’t pushing this through
Fearing religious arguments, etc.
Majority say they believe it should be made available
Active v. passive euthanasia
Active euthanasia (assisted suicide): Occurs when a physician, close friend, or relative helps an ill or disabled person terminate his or her life
Involves taking action to hasten death
Ex) A doctor administering a lethal injection
Passive euthanasia: Withholding or withdrawing medical treatment from the hopelessly ill
Ex) A doctor turns off a ventilator or stops artificial feeding
Criteria for requesting medical aid-in-dying
The very stringent guidelines
Ex) In Oregon, the patient must be sound of mind when they request a prescription for a lethal dose of medication. Two doctors must confirm a diagnosis of terminal illness with no more than six months to live. Two witnesses, one non-doctor unrelated to the patient, must confirm the patient’s request, and the patient must make a second request after 15 days
State residency requirements
Arguments for and against medical aid-in-dying
Reasons cited in support of PAS/MAID: The anguish of incurable terminal illness for patients
Prolonged dying process
Unwanted or futile care
Feeding tubes, ventilator
Physical discomfort
Emotional and spiritual strain
Lack of autonomy
Non-responsiveness (brain-dead)
Dependent or strained relationships
Watching a loved one suffer (anticipatory grief)
Difficult caregiving duties, often requiring complex medical regimens
Financial costs
Coordinating caregiving
Subject to potentially abusive behavior by dementia patients
Physical strain and possibly premature death
Thus people are in support of PAS/MAID because it preserves patient autonomy and dignity, avoid unbearable suffering, ensuring a peaceful death, relieve caregiving duties, relieve financial burdens, and maintaining control over the timing and circumstances of death
Why are people against it?
Suicide is never an option
Religious groups’ view on suicide
It is incompatible with the healing goals of medicine
A request for death needs psychological care
Death is not an option–better care in hospitals or hospice
People may prejudice fate of the old, crippled, and weak
Contemporary memorials
Memorials that capture the decedent’s identity (end-of-life ritual)
A party or nightclub-like funeral home in London
You can have a fun funeral that captures who you were in life
Life well celebrated brand of US funerals
Discos
BBQs
Motorcycle
Epitomizes concept of “post-self” and continuity theory
We want people to remember us in life, not in death
People want to die as they live
Playing an active role in continuing oneself (the person planning for their funeral)
Capital exploit? Or is there something to be said with these celebrations of life?
Cultural norms about grief
If you go back to work the day after, you can be stigmatized
Dating too quickly after one’s spouse passes away
Highly contextual
Depends on how the family wants to grieve (may not align with the person dying)
Final act of closure can be disrupted by these “fun” funerals
No one way to grieve, celebrate, or commemorate a life
Extraordinarily expensive
“You wouldn’t want your loved one to have a cheap coffin”
Capacity to provide a meaningful celebration is out of reach for lower-income people
Doesn’t mean they care any less, but is a financial struggle
Economic factors guide it even though it should be personal
Cremation is considered more environmental and cheaper
Three-legged stool of retirement income (Social security, private pensions, personal savings/wealth)
How do retirees support themselves?
The “three-legged stool” of retirement income
Social security: Monthly income from the government
Those lower-income are very reliant on this since pensions are typically from a good job and personal savings is essentially wealth
Pension: Regular payment from employer
Personal savings: Wealth
The fourth leg is wages/salary for those still working
Those more at risk: Women, people with less education, people subjected to racism
Purpose of this stool is to describe what the main components are, but the important thing is that the legs are not all the same length for all people
If you have a poor quality job or you are poor, you have SS but not the other two (no savings in the bank or a job that provides private pension)
The stool is most wobbly for those who rely on SS the most
If you are someone who has a reliable and stable stool, you are able to rely on private pensions and personal savings
Social security: purposes and characteristics
Social security: A social insurance program (an entitlement)
Workers pay into the system while they are employed and employers pay matching contributions
Social security’s guaranteed benefits are available to support workers and their families in retirement, or when they lose their livelihood due to career-ending disability or the death of a family worker
Your monthly paycheck: Where did my money go?
You’ve been paying into social security your whole life
Taxes taken out of your paycheck now
Social Security employee
Medicare employee
Vast majority get Social Security even in lower-wage jobs
Even those who didn’t work that much are entitled to social security (widows, spouses of working partner)
Older adults had the highest poverty rates in the 1960s
Now, they have the lowest poverty rates
Variable within ethnicity
Because of the expansion of Social Security benefits, it pulled millions of people out of poverty
Still not efficient to eradicate poverty
Entitlement program
Entitlement program: Government-funded benefits like Social Security, Medicare, SNAP, and unemployment that provide financial aid or services to eligible individuals meeting specific criteria (age, income, disability)
Acts as a social safety net
Types of Social Security benefits
More than 69 million people receive Social Security each month in one of three categories
Retirement insurance: You work and then as a retiree, you get a benefit based on your income
Survivors’ insurance: If a family member dies, you get some of their benefit
Historically a big deal for women widows who get their deceased spouse’s benefit
Disability insurance: Those with disability can get this check before 65 years old
Dual entitled: Eligible for own retirement or spouse
Choose the higher one
General range of annual Social Security benefits
How much does Social Security pay?
Average monthly rent in MA (2025): $2,500
In periods of inflation, retirement benefits will be adjusted
Widowed mother and two children: $3,669
All retired workers: $1,927
Aged couple, both receiving benefits: $3,014
All disabled workers: $1,542
Range for SS is based largely on family situation: $2000-3000 per month, the levels differ across different subcategories, married couples would get more than an individual because it’s done at the household level, a widower with 2 children vs. a widower living alone, average amount of SS tends not to be sufficient to pay someone’s monthly bills for real estate and food
Thus those only living on SS without savings or private pensions are at a high risk of poverty
Monthly average benefits across states (NJ and MA are not dramatically higher than states with a lower quality SOL)
Dual entitlement
Dual entitled: Eligible for own retirement or spouse
Choose the higher one
Spouse vs. survivor benefit
Spouse benefit: A Social Security benefit paid to the spouse of a retired worker that is equal to 50% of the worker’s benefit
Survivor benefit: A Social Security benefit payable to the widow or widower of a deceased worker; equal to 100% of the worker’s benefit
Historically a big deal for women widows who get their deceased spouse’s benefit
Variation in older adults’ level of reliance on Social Security as sole source of income
Nearly 90% of persons age 65 and older receive Social Security
Among older beneficiaries, 50% of married couples and 70% of unmarried individuals receive half or more of their income from Social Security
Among older beneficiaries, 21% of married couples and 45% of unmarried individuals receive almost all (90% or more) of their income from Social Security
Importance and necessity of Social Security
For some populations, it is the end-all-be-all capacity to live here
Factors that reduce amount of Social Security benefits
Retiring early before claiming your full retirement age (lowers your monthly payment permanently)
Race and sex variations in late-life poverty risk
Heavy reliance on Social Security by race
Half or more of their income
White: 60%
Black: 69%
Asian: 62%
Hispanic: 73%
90% or more of their income
White: 32%
Black: 45%
Asian: 41%
Hispanic: 52%
Those who had more privileges and opportunities (more money coming in), they won’t rely as much on Social Security
Heavy reliance on Social Security by gender and family type
By gender
Half or more of their income
Unmarried women: 61%
Unmarried men: 56%
90% or more of their income
Unmarried women: 34%
Unmarried men: 29%
Single women (historically) were encouraged to not join the workforce and to do caregiving, resulting in less pensions given to them, therefore resulting in the late feminization of poverty seen in older female adults
By family type
Half or more of their income
Married couples: 48%
Unmarried people: 71%
90% or more of their income
Married couples: 21%
Unmarried people: 43%
Missing out on major marriage-related benefits such as spousal/survivor benefits
Greater reliance on Social Security among lower-income groups
Reasons for Black-white gap in wealth/savings (Miller)
Steep race disparities in retirement savings (Miller)
Average family liquid retirement savings (1989-2016)
In 1989, there was a sizeable gap between white and Black and Hispanic families of larger liquid retirement savings
In 2016, this gap has drastically widened of white families having far larger liquid retirement savings than Black and Hispanic families
Tends to happen along race and ethnicity, educational attainment, discriminatory hiring practices, priced out of housing markets
That discrepancy is getting wider and wider, helping us to understand why we still have large poverty rates
Unemployment rates for older Black and Latino workers have been much higher than their white counterparts
Millions will retire prematurely, meaning sharp reductions in SS income that will hit non-white people especially hard
Black and Latino retirees are especially likely to lack sufficient resources
Stems from racism in the labor market
History of discrimination in hiring, pay, promotions, and benefits which also contributes to occupational segregation (unequal concentration of demographic groups in certain jobs or industries leading to lower wages and persistent economic inequality)
Policies served as barriers to wealth accumulation of Black people
Jim Crow segregation laws, restrictive covenants, redlining
This all happens because the rich are getting richer (pulling up the gap)
As more people have more and more wealth, they can pay drive the prices up of everything
Pay for the highest wage for different services, pay for luxurious apartments, etc.
If you have a lot of money, you’ll get a fair amount of interest from your bank account
Those with higher income can pay for higher quality care
Can draw in on personal savings (less reliance on Social Security)
When you are lengthening the retirement age to get the full benefit, it puts a cut on people who are going to die younger
Average longevity of Black Americans is shorter
Potential threats to Social Security in future decades
Aging population
More people are living longer (increased life expectancy) and having fewer children (lower fertility), leading to a higher ratio of retirees to workers
1960: 5.1 workers per beneficiary
2005: 3.3 workers per beneficiary
2031: 2.1 workers per beneficiary
One reason why we study old-age dependency ratios
Not only puts more strain on the workers, but also begs the question, who’s going to take care of the elderly?
Labor shortages, high healthcare costs
Baby boomers
This large generation retiring puts a strain on the system as fewer young workers pay in
Privatization
Diverting a portion of payroll taxes to private individual accounts
Results in rising inequality amongst old age because low-income workers would have less to invest; some people can lose all their retirement savings
Restoring the trust fund (raising the age for full SS benefits)
Some older people won’t find jobs because of age discrimination, job competition may increase, causing wages for younger workers to decline, the poorest elderly would suffer most by any across-the-board cut
Those facing adversity might not reach maximum SS benefits or will live fewer years with SS benefits
Possible solutions for Social Security and their strengths/limitations
Possible solutions to Social Security to stay solvent (save money) or better reduce poverty?
Raise age for full benefits (stay solvent)
Works for more well-off people
Those already rich have better health conditions
Someone with poor health may not make it to 69 years old, therefore will live more of their lives not receiving Social Security benefits
If you’re scrambling to make ends meet or don’t speak English, you won’t be out there lobbying to fight against this proposal
At age 67, it’s 100% entitlement without penalty deduction
Make an across the board cut (stay solvent)/addition (better reduce poverty)
Recent increase to adjust for cost of living (COLA) increases
Everybody gets more or alternatively, everybody gets less
May look equitable but also something politically contested
Increase payroll tax on highest earning Americans (both)
Even if you raise the taxes considerably on that top .5%, that will generate a lot of money
But can generate loopholes where wealthy Americans avoid this
Create a minimum benefit floor (better reduce poverty)
Minimum level that everyone should have to live off of
Make benefits mean tested (both)
Mean tested: Not universal, eligibility requirements
If your income falls below this point, you are eligible
Relevant for us because of Social Security
SS pays money to older adults to live on
There’s a fear that SS will go bankrupt since there are 75 million older adults living on SS
Proposal: If anybody’s pension income is more than a certain amount, then they will not get SS
Free lunch, financial aid from college, Medicaid for lower-income adults
Means-testing
Mean testing: Not universal, eligibility requirements
If your income falls below this point, you are eligible
Free lunch, financial aid from college, Medicaid for lower-income adults
Privatization of Social Security
Workers save and invest a portion of their payroll taxes for retirement, disability, or inheritance, often with the goal of higher returns but facing risks like market volatility, higher fees, and reduced guaranteed benefits
Workers should be allowed to divert a portion of their share of payroll taxes into private accounts
Meant to appeal to younger workers who like the idea of having the opportunity to build wealth (used for retirement or to pass onto their children)
The problem with this is that it is risky but because people can’t predict when they get laid off from a job, get sick, get divorced or time their retirement withdrawals so they have enough to last a lifetime
Age of retirement and Social Security benefit level
At age 67, it’s 100% entitlement without penalty deduction
The earlier you retire, the less you get
Encourages people to draw later so the government doesn’t pay them for more years
Minimum age increases in response to population aging, incentivizing older adults to continue working
65 → 67
On average, if you retire at 62, your monthly benefit will be $725 compared to $1280 at 70
Then SS benefits stopincreasing after age 70
If you claim any of these things early, you get less (penalty)
Disadvantages those who face more adversities
Those whose bodies can’t keep working, those who faced the death of a loved one, those whose spouse prematurely died
Age differences in voter participation
Voter turnout in presidential elections (1964-2020)
Those 65+ had the highest turnout
Increase in 65+ over the decades because they have more time, grew up during a time with more civics training, and Social Security is a huge issue for them
In 2024, 57% of older adults 65+ were more likely to vote than those ages 18-24
Those 45-64 had the second highest turnout
Those 25-44 had the third highest turnout
Those 18-24 had the lowest turnout
Younger people have really jumped around over the decades
Fought in the Vietnam War, thus voting turnouts ended up being higher
Older people are more likely to vote than every generation
Younger people have lower voter turnouts because they have more things to juggle (school, work, etc.)
If an age effect is operating, one might conclude that people are more likely to vote as they grow older
People do seem to become more politically aware as they grow older
Cohort differences of voter participation
Boomers and Silent Gen still vote at higher overall rates (particularly presidential elections)
Increased voting among older people is due to a cohort effect in which people are who are older now, have always been inclined to exercise their right to vote (continuity theory)
Ex) Baby Boomers and previous generations often came of age during periods of higher political activism and generally established stronger initial voting habits than some subsequent generations
The young people who seem disaffected by politics may never become more active
Boomers are protesting Trump, but where is Gen Z?
Lots of older people at these protests when in fact, for Gen Z, it’s a lot more consequential
One reason that older people are having such large turnouts and protests
Trump regime is bad news, but if you’ve seen 15 presidents, that this is a complete rupture with the America they knew, striking older people harder
Something quite beyond the norm
Huge willingness of older people out on the streets
Enormous pleasure for younger people that older adults are not abandoning them, but showing up and trying to do something about it
Intergenerational ties
Solidarity with younger people
Negative perceptions of older adults
Showing that they haven’t stolen the future from younger generations
Age differences in political preference in recent elections
Young voters were a strong group for the Democrats, but less so than in 2018
Older people are more likely to vote than every generation
2020
18-29: 59% voted for Biden
30-49: 55% voted for Biden
50-64: 47% voted for Biden
65+: 48% voted for Biden
Same results have shown in 2016 and 2018 where younger people are more likely to identify with the Democrats while older people are more likely to identify with the Republicans and be more conservative
2020 vs. 2024
Age differences
2020
Older adults 65+ were almost half and half
18-29: 62% voted Democrat
2024
Older adults 65+ were half and half
18-29: 55% voted Democrat
Education: Those with higher educational attainment are always more democratic
All other ethnicities are more likely to be left-leaning than white people
Reasons for differences in younger versus older persons’ voter turnout
Younger people don’t have as much time on their hands because of school, work, etc. which makes it harder to vote
Cohort effect or age effect
Cohort: Depending on the generation you were born in, the level of political activity can highly affect one’s own political activity
Older people have more factors to worry about
Social Security, taxes, mortgages, etc.
Younger adults may be more distrustful in the government
Continuity theory
If you were someone protesting for Women’s rights and Civil rights, many of them will take that with them today
Time and social ties as path to social engagement
Older people usually have stronger, long-established social networks (family, friends, organizations, religious groups) whereas younger people’s social networks are still forming
Stronger social ties —> more social pressure and motivation to vote
Older people also generally have more time on their hands (retired, settled careers, stable housing) so they are able to participate
Social movements and participation
Main path that takes them to protest is time and social ties
Younger people are more likely to participate in social movements as older adults may have health conditions, and younger generations often express higher levels of support for racial justice, climate change, and LGBTQ+ rights
Direct and immediate personal impacts of policies
Social security, Medicare
Historical perspective (crystallized intelligence)
Older people’s history, and the downside of particular historical moments
More motivated to politically engage
Issues/values that motivate older voters (Gonyea and Hudson)
Social security, healthcare, environmental sustainability, gun rights
Interest groups
Interest groups: Organizations that represent individuals lobbying politicians to take certain actions or suggest particular policy initiatives
Calling them, phoning them, giving them information
“Gray lobby”
“Gray lobby”: Organizations that represents the interest of older adults
Unions
Ex) Reagan’s proposal of cuts in future SS benefits, early retirement benefits, and a tightening of the eligibility criteria for disability benefits sparked anger and disapproval from older adults in which they formed organizations to represent the interests of older people
Characteristics and activities of AARP
American Association for Retired Persons (AARP): Among the largest interest groups in the US, representing 38 million members with an annual operating budget of nearly $2B
A non-partisan, nonprofit organization focused on empowering aging through advocacy, information, and service
Powerful organization advocating for retired people
Offers health and life insurance to retirees
AARP lobbies actively on behalf of senior issues and scored a big success in lobbying for the elimination of mandatory retirement
Fighting against ageism
Provides support for older people in need through several programs
Free job training and placement to low-income older people so they can rejoin the workforce
Free tax preparation
Can rarely take a position without angering at least some members
Generational equity debates and their limitations
Generational equity debates
Some younger people argue that older adults have received more than their fair share of public resources, and this has left them financially advantaged relative to younger adults
Cartoon of younger generations carrying student loans while older adults are riding in golf carts
Paints the older generation as the enemy
Assumption that they’re retired, have money, and leisurely participating
Those older generations were also working really hard to achieve financial stability
Fuels the notion of generational gaps
Fear that older people have gotten more, leaving the younger adults with nothing
Limitations:
Overlooks the economic interdependence between generations
Ignores women’s and minority’s hardships
Activism among older adults: patterns and reasons (Williamson)
Black American activists who have fought and protested for racial equality, abolition, and women’s rights have passed their knowledge onto their ancestors who continue their legacy
Activism among older adults has been shown through many Black and African American activists who fought for civil rights and abolition of slavery. Thus, this crystallized intelligence and accumulation of wisdom and knowledge had intergenerationally spread through their descendance and into the ancestors as mentioned in the article, showing remnants of continuity theory, and showing how older adults are very active in civic engagement especially if they were raised and cultivated during a time of intense civic engagement
Activism among older adults
Reasons why climate change impacts are more harmful to older vs. younger adults (Haq)
Rising heat hurts older adults much more than it hurts younger adults
Cooler regions with older populations are projected to experience the steepest relative increases in temperature over the next 3 decades
Hotter regions with younger populations will experience an unprecedented surge in the size of their aged populations
Rapidly aging hot regions will have unprecedented number of older adults at risk of heat exposure
Why is climate change so harmful to older adults?
Biological/physical factors
Reduced capacity to thermoregulate–meaning reduced capacity to sweat
Underlying health conditions like heart disease and diabetes that can be made worse by exposure to heat extremes
Medications (anticholinergics) that cause dehydration exacerbate effects of heat
Dependence on ventilators, AC, etc. means peril during power outages
Psychosocial and economic factors
Isolated older adults may get depressed if confined to home on extreme temperature days
Those on fixed income struggle to pay for AC or heating
Some lack support or mobility needed to evacuate or go to cooling centers
Some refuse to evacuate because they have nowhere to go and don’t want to abandon meager possessions and pets
Cannot take pets to shelters
Cognitive factors
May not be aware of or understand risk
Messaging (text messages, alerts) may be confusing
Heat/heat stroke can lead to further disorientation
May be fearful/aggressive around first responders
Especially harmful to older women and those with disabilities
Many older people lack the physical, mental, social, and financial resources needed to avoid or minimize the effects of extreme weather, especially in the Global South
Older adults’ role in climate change activism (Pillemer)
Older adults often have more time for civic engagement and volunteerism, and they have critical lived experience and expertise to contribute to such efforts
Benefits
Promotes physical and mental health among older people (increase in physical activity)
Taking action to resolve local environmental problems is empowering and can enhance older peoples’ self-efficacy
Older people experience a need for generativity: activities that are focused on improving the world and leaving a legacy for future generations
Older adults’ memories of past events and disasters provide valuable insights which can be crucial in adapting to and reducing the impact of climate change
Barriers to this
Lack of resources (occupying privileged status provides the individual with larger amounts of money and time and relevant skill)
Different environmental attitudes amongst cohorts
Some older people feel as though they do not understand the issues or not have the specialized expertise needed for some activities
Older adults are not passive victims, but active players in addressing climate change
Older folks who started those protests 50 years and still protesting
Volunteerism
Increased older environmental activism can offer gains to communities
Green consumption
Passing down knowledge about sustainable agricultural practices to younger generations
All in this together
Older adults are not helpless people but are working intergenerationally to put some of these issues on the map
Potential adaptations to protect older adults from climate change impacts
Possible solutions required?
Address impacts on rising concentrations of older adults in places already equipped to manage extreme heat
Transport to cooling centers
Tailored messaging and surveillance
Health care workforce growth
Address rising temperatures in places with robust supports for concentrated older populations
Cost-effective cooling systems
Increased green spaces
How can social gerontologists inform climate interventions?
Provide input on messaging (FEMA released in November 2023)
Training for first responders (special need of older adults)
Raise awareness of community-level needs in “hotspots” with both population aging and rising temperatures
Need for special need emergency registries
Inform the placement, safety, and access of cooling and warming centers
Encourage cross-generation conversations and activism
Services needed for older adults
Improve coordination between aging services agencies, emergency/disaster agencies, government and ngos
Emergency services: Access to emergency and warming/cooling shelters
Mapping at-risk areas and groups
Communication strategies
Early warning systems, use many types of media
Internet/phone connections
Telehealth
Retrofit homes, reduce energy insecurity
Housing: Weatherizing senior housing and mobile homes, prioritizing resilient energy grids for critical facilities (including senior centers, SNFs), discounting ACs
Increase neighborhood resilience
Infrastructure - Utilities and transportation
Transportation: Aging in place, car-sharing, public transportation that can withstand extreme weather conditions
Fund existing spaces such as senior centers
Make plans for institutional and care settings
Generational differences in climate attitudes
Slight cohort gaps but majority of ALL age groups prioritize sustainability
Gen Z, Millennials more active than older generations addressing climate change on- and offline
Older people may lack the capacity to voice their opinions
Older adults are less inclined than younger adults to sacrifice part of their income on behalf of a clean environment, pledging divestment from fossil fuels or curtailing the emission of greenhouse gases is lower in older adults, and evidence found that younger adults are more concerned about climate change than older adults
Young people are more exposed to climate change immanence through education and what is posted online social media whereas back in the 70s or 80s, it wasn’t as aired, therefore older adults may also be less aware of the need for pressing climate change matters
Younger adults are also experiencing more of this because they’re the ones growing up into a future whereas older adults may not care as much