building up over time, across the levels in a food chain
• Consequences of lipophilic tendency
Physical-chemical Properties
12
New cards
Physical-chemical Properties
Generally, higher-molecular-weight chemicals are:
– More lipophilic and more persistent – Less volatile and less water-soluble
Persistence in environment \n – Quantified as a half-life in air, water, or soil – Affected by environmental conditions
13
New cards
Toxicology
the science of the effects of toxic substances and of their fate and transport in the body
* “Study of poisons” * “the science which studies toxic substances or poisons, that are substances which cause alteration or perturbation in the function of an organisms leading to harmful effects (Truhaut, 1974) * Receptor * Exposure * Dose * Response
14
New cards
Receptor
* Organism (human?) receiving exposure or dose * The human envelope—boundary that separates the interior of the body from the exterior environment * Age * General health * Genetic makeup \n
15
New cards
Exposure
* Contact with the human envelope
Routes of exposure
* – Ingested (often greatest source of chemical exposure, 85%) * – Inhaled (air pollution, particles and volatiles, 10%) * – Absorbed through the skin (industrial, 5%) • Frequency of exposure
16
New cards
Exposure Assessment
• Goal is to quantify exposure
(or to find out Dose) \n • Methods draw on understanding of both:
– Environmental science (fate and transport of toxicants in environment)
– Toxicology (fate and transport of toxicants in the body)
17
New cards
Completing the Conceptual Model of Exposure
a) source: emission or concentration in ambient environment------1)false and trasnport-------b)concentration in microenvironment or personal environment------2) ingestion, inhalation, dermal contact.
18
New cards
Toxicoknetics
the disposition of toxicants in the body
19
New cards
Completing the Conceptual Model of Exposure Toxicokinetics
c) exposure----d) absorbed dose-----e0 biologically effective dose-----f)change in tissue structure of function------g)possible health effect
20
New cards
Quantifying Exposure
Tools for area monitoring and personal monitoring
21
New cards
**Area monitoring**
A filter inserted into the nozzle of a vacuum cleaner (a) collects dust to be analyzed in a laboratory. \n
22
New cards
**Personal monitoring**
A portable sampling device (b) incorporates a pump that takes a continuous air sample near the subject’s breathing zone; the device also collects a sample of particulate matter over the whole period.
23
New cards
Units of absorbed dose: mg / (kg\*day)
– Mass of toxicant \n – Normalized to body weight \n – Averaged over time
Quantifying Exposure
24
New cards
Other sources of exposure info
* – Questionnaires, diaries * – Surrogate measures (measure of effect of a specific treatment that may correlate with a *real)* * – Geographic information systems (GIS) \n Quantifying Exposure
25
New cards
A quantification of exposure
the amount of substance a person has ingested inhaled or/and absorbed
Dose
26
New cards
Acute dose
refers to single dose, usually high
Dose
27
New cards
Chronic dose
repeated or continuous low dose over time
Dose
28
New cards
Long term
low dose over a lifetime
Dose
29
New cards
Body burden
– Absorption – Distribution – Metabolism – Storage
– Excretion
30
New cards
Toxicodynamics
effects in the body (response)
31
New cards
Burning
destruction of cells caused by exposure to high concentration of strong acids or bases
Response and Nonspecific
32
New cards
Narcosis
depression in sensory activity, reversible, caused by alcohols, ethers, and benzene
Response and Nonspecific
33
New cards
Specific
* Damage to excretory organs * Damage to respiratory organs * Damage to reproductive function * Mutagenesis * Carcinogenesis * Response
34
New cards
Acute toxicity
rapid death
Response
35
New cards
Chronic toxicity
Response
36
New cards
Paracelsus’ Principle: *“The Dose Makes the Poison”*
• Every chemical is harmful at some level of exposure
• How much exposure causes a harmful response????
* Differently for different individuals * The dose of a usually unknown mixture of chemicals
37
New cards
The Dose-response Relationship
• Quantitativerelationshipbetweendoseandeffect
(response)
– Often summarized in graph \n – Dose on x-axis; response on y-axis \n – Graded response as a function of dose – Acute toxicity tests are used
38
New cards
Slope
(potency of effect) and Dose- Response Curves (more potent and less potent) response relationship
39
New cards
Threshold
(potential for safe dose) and response relationship (b and a separate)
Dose- Response Curves
40
New cards
S-Shape
• A more realistic flattened *S*-shape
a) slope looks like one stair going up
b) threeshold looks like two stairs going up
41
New cards
Toxicity Testing
• Chronic rodent bioassay (2 years)
– 3 exposure levels, ideally including: \n • Dose high enough to test for cancer \n • Dose low enough to reveal no-effect level
– Unexposed control group \n – Results used to create dose-response curves for
various health effects
42
New cards
*Highest*
non-zero dose at which *no* effect was observed = No Observed Adverse Effect level (NOAEL)
* Toxicity Testing
43
New cards
*Lowest*
dose at which an effect *was* observed = Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL)
* Toxicity Testing * If a study shows both a NOAEL and a LOAEL, can infer that the threshold is between them
44
New cards
Two dose-response curves
a) dose-response curve showing NOAEL and LOAEL
b) dose-response curve showing only LOAEL
45
New cards
curves
Dose-response curves developed for cancer and various non-cancer effects
46
New cards
*Reproductive* toxicity
effect on reproductive capacity
of organism
47
New cards
*Developmental* toxicity
effect on developing organism, including teratogenesis
48
New cards
Other Methods for Toxicity Testing
• Case reports
• Epidemiological studies \n • Computer simulations \n • Tissue cultures of cells and bacteria
49
New cards
**Endpoint**
physiological manifestation
– Can be readily measured
– Use of “biomarkers” e.g. changes in hormone levels, protein markers, and enzyme induction