VL XI - Eddy viscosity modeling

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/13

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:16 PM on 7/9/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

14 Terms

1
New cards

With which quantity does the cost for a Turbulent Simulation Scale

Reynolds number

2
New cards

What scales are needed for Modeling RANS

  • Velocity/Time scale

  • Length scale

3
New cards
4
New cards

Ananlogy Turbulent fluctuations to molecular diffusion

  • Eddies exchange momentum with another

5
New cards

Formel Normal Stress

<p></p>
6
New cards

With what does molecular viscosity differ

With different fluids

7
New cards

With what does turbulent viscosity differ

With different flows

8
New cards

Problems of Mixing length model

  • Dominant flow direction and wall distance need to be known

  • Potential overestimation of mixing layer

    • turbulent viscosity

      • momentum transfer at wall

        • delayed detachment prediction

  • Main Problem is prediction of turbulent viscosity in outer flow domain

9
New cards

Pros and Cons of Algebraical Models

Pros:

  • Mathematical simplicity

  • Numerical robustness

  • Suitable for 2D boundary layers without detachment or pressure gradients

Cons:

  • Insufficient for complex flows with significantly curved mean streamlines

  • Works fors small groups of flows only with proper parameter calibration

  • No robust generalization

10
New cards

Modeling Problem of Algebraic Models

For algebraic Models: Eddie viscosity = 0 for mean velocity at core, which is a problem

» Solution: two equation models

11
New cards

Whats dissipation in regards to Turbulence

Change of TKE over Time

12
New cards

Pros and Cons One equation model

Pros:

  • Mathematical simplicity

  • No Transport eq. required for dissipation

  • Includes knowledge on TKE transport

  • Calibrated for shear dominated flows

Cons:

  • Extra-effort of additional transport equation

  • Empirical relations for lentgh-scale, therefore often failing for complex flows

13
New cards

Concept of Eddy-Viscosity Transport model

  • Directly model transport of eddy-viscosity as derived quantity

  • Note, such a tranport equation is not derived from conservation law

14
New cards

Pros and Cons of Transport models

Pros:

  • Robustness and effeciency similar to simple on-eq. models

  • no length scale required

  • Good results for simple shear flows including detachment

Cons:

  • No physical justification

  • Unsuitable for complex flows and free jets