1/49
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
What is a common preference of facial attractiveness
high uniformity in facial symmetry of attractive faces
How are attractive people judged
more positively across a range of factors
What are the range of factors that attractive people are judged more positively on, Langlois et al., 2000
more likely to have dates
babies gaze longer at attractive faces
rated as more adjusted
perceived to be happier and more successful
Men find two types of women attractive
childlike features
e.g. large eyes, small nose, small chin
mature features
e.g. big smile, prominent cheekbones, high eyebrows
Both men and women prefer women with what type of facial features
feminine facial features
What are the determinants of men facial attractiveness
large eyes set wide apart
small nose
prominent cheek bones
large chin
angular jaw
Do women prefer a feminine male face or a masculine male face
preferred feminine male face
Women associate different personality traits with different …
face shape
Masculine-faced men perceived by women as…
cold, dominant, untrustworthy, seek a quick fling
Feminine-faced men perceived by women as…
warm, kind, honest, and most likely to be committed in a long-term relationship
Are bearded faces attractive (70s, 1991, 2014, 2018)
70s - rated bearded men attractive, masculine, mature, dominant, etc.
1991 - rated clean-shaven men younger, more attractive, and more sociable than bearded
2014 - women & men rate heavy stubble and full bearded men more attractive
2018 - Australian women rated men with full beard as more attractive
possibly indication of masculinity and high testosterone levels
What is evolutionary psychology
studied the evolution of psychological mechanisms in human behaviour
What core assumption does evolutionary psychology have
humans have preferences when selecting romantic partners/mates
these preferences are not random or culturally determined, they are universal and serve as adaptive solutions to evolutionary problems
The study of sexual selection and mate choice can be divided into two broad domains
biological approach
evolutionary psychological approach
What is the biological approach to the study of sexual selection and mate choice
explores aspects of human sexual behaviour and physiology
e.g. ovulation, menopause
What is the evolutionary psychological approach to the study of sexual selection and mate choice
tested through social scientific methods to predict human mate preferences and choices, to suggest adaptive solutions to evolutionary problems
What did early evolution theorists argue
mate choice/selection is based on our desire for certain traits in our selected mate
typically women choose males according to her desire for certain traits she wants in a male
i.e. her preference for traits influences who she chooses to mate with and reproduce
What did modern evolution theorists argue
mate choice involves both the woman’s choice of male’s traits, and male’s choice of woman’s traits
but woman’s choice is more intense than male’s choice
What type of male’s behavioural cues are also potential mate choice cues to the woman (Miller, 2000)
behavioural cues that indicate that he will be a good parent and can provide offspring
What is parental investment
refers to the amount of time, energy, and resources parents invest in producing and raising offspring
the more parents invest the more likely the offspring is to survive and reproduce, thus passing theory genes to the next generation
Men and women have evolved conditional mating strategies guided by
cues and signals
What is the waist-hip-ratio (WHR)
evolutionary processes favour women with a WHR of 0.70
large
signals youthfulness, good health, and fertility
Do foraging societies favour the WHR
thin women = ill and weak
preferred larger WHR
Do western societies favour the WHR
heavy women = ill
prefer smaller WHR
What is a critique of evolutionary psychology explanation of attraction and mating
many EP studies provide support for evolutionary hypothesis rather than being directly a test of theory
results are often not consistent with alternative explanations
approach is too narrow, fails to consider alternative explanations
What are the two basic assumptions from cognitive-evolutionary approach to facial attractiveness (Gangestad & Simpson, 2000)
evolutionary processes
favour attributes close to the population average
cognitive process
favour typical/average
What is the aim of the Facial symmetry & perceived health study, Rhodes et al., 2001
to determine whether facial averageness & symmetry signal good health
What is the rationale of the Facial symmetry & perceived health study, Rhodes et al., 2001
genetic and environmental stresses during development produce random deviations in the symmetry of faces
What happened in the Facial symmetry & perceived health study, Rhodes et al., 2001
24 adults (M+F) rated the health of a set of 292 young adult faces where averageness and symmetry had been manipulated
rate their health and how distinct they are:
healthiness rating from
1 = not healthy, to 7 = very healthy
distinctiveness (ease which a face can be picked out from a crowd)
1 = not distinctive, to 7 = distinctive
What are the results of Facial symmetry & perceived health study, Rhodes et al., 2001
perfect symmetric faces (manipulated) were rated as healthy
perceived health negatively correlated with distinctiveness
so symmetric faces signal good health, and distinctive faces (i.e. low averageness) signal unhealthy
findings support cognitive evolutionary assumption that symmetrical and average faces are attractive because they are perceived as healthy
What were the participants in Little et al., (2007) study
78 white UK participants, (39M+39F, age 18–44, mean age=24)
42 Hadza participants, (29M+29F, age 20–56, mean age=33)
What happened in Little et al., (2007) study
showed them 5 images of faces of females and 5 of male from each race
each race was shown images of their own race
each participant was shown the original and the manipulated image
What were the results from Little et al., (2007) study
symmetric faced were more attractive than asymmetry across both the cultures, but more so in the Hadza (a tribe) than in the UK
Hadza men placed a greater value on facial symmetry in women’s faces
Hadza women reported increased preferences for symmetry in men’s faces when they were pregnant or nursing
more likely due to their increased discrimination and sensitivity to foods and disease harmful to a foetus or nursing infant
What are the conclusions from Little et al., (2007) study
there may be an evolutionary relevance in symmetry preference, and that it is strategic between cultures and within individuals of a single culture
symmetry may indicate genetic quality which may be more important among the Hadza were there is much higher mortality rate from birth onwards than UK society
What are the factors that contribute to attraction
proximity
familiarity
reciprocal linking
similarity
physical attractiveness
What is proximity
chatting with people nearby, working and living nearby others
its important as a form of social interaction and increases mutual linking, promotes willingness for cooperation
Describe how proximity increases interpersonal linking, Ji-eun S. et al., (2018)
3 experimental studies on proximity and men’s judgments of women
results:
men liked women who were nearby, because they seemed more accessible than women far away
conclusion:
so physical distance between people shapes their attraction and relationship experience
findings support the general idea that proximity increases liking
What is familiarity
the more exposure we have to someone, the more at ease we feel with them
this can increase liking/attraction
What did Jorgensen & Cervone (2008) argue (familiarity)
more frequent exposure to faces of strangers increased liking them
however, exposure doesn’t always increase attraction, sometime it can have an opposite effect
e..g sometimes a person can become annoyed by another’s repeated behaviours and idiosyncrasies (uniqueness) instead of growing more fond of them over time
What is the propinquity effect (familiarity)
similar to the exposure effect, in that it is the more we see/interact with a person, the more likely we are to become friend/intimate partner
but familiarity can also occur without physical exposure
studies have shown that relationships formed over the internet resemble those developed face-to-face, in terms of perceived quality and depth
What is reciprocal liking
reciprocity principle: a major determinant in attraction
tendency to like people who like us, and dislike those who dislike us
What is similarity
we like those whom we have things in common with
Describe what the Law of Attraction is (Byrne, 1971)
linear relationship between attraction towards a person and proportion of similar attitudes shared with that person
What is the Attitude Similarity study, Newcomb (1961)
students completed attitude questionnaires before arrived to university
measured attraction between students and attitude change over one semester
findings:
proximity and having similar attitudes and things in common were important factors in determining ratings of attraction (complementarity)
What did Miller (1972) point out
that attitude similarity increased positive judgement of the other person and elicited attraction and forming favourable judgement of each other
in contrast dissimilarity reduced the impact of these cues
Does having similar personality traits matter
studies have reported mixed findings on whether similarity in personality traits between people in a relationship is necessary or essential for relationship satisfaction
this is due to different types of research methodologies used
What facial and physical features are we attracted to
men: symmetrical face, and wasit-hip-ratio
women: feminine features
What is the relationship between facial symmetry and health
facial symmetry correlated with good health
What increases liking
proximity, familiarity, reciprocal liking, similarity, physical attractiveness
What role does similarity play in friendships vs. romantic relationships
similarity is more central to the initial formation of friendships, but in romantic relationships it is a key predictor of long-term satisfaction and stability