Freedom of Expression Part 1

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/21

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Pertinent deChavez v. Gonzales (2008); Integrated Bar of the Philippines v. Atienza (2008); People v. Pagente (2025); The Diocese of Bacolod v. COMELEC

Last updated 1:58 PM on 9/11/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

22 Terms

1
New cards

February 15, 2008

date of Chavez v Gonzales ruling

2
New cards

Francisco Chavez

petitioner of Chavez v. Gonzales

3
New cards

Raul M. Gonzales (DOJ Secretary) and National Telecommunications Commission (NTC)

respondents of Chavez v. Gonzales

4
New cards

Chief Justice Reynato Puno

Justice in Chavez v. Gonzales

5
New cards

No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, of the press, and the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.

Article III, Section 4 of the Philippine Constitution

6
New cards

Petition GRANTED

ruling of Chavez v. Gonzales

7
New cards

February 24, 2010

date of IBP v. Atienza ruling

8
New cards

National President Jose Anselmo I. Cadiz, Harry L. Roque, Joel Ruiz Butuyan

represented Integrated Bar of the Philipppines in IBP v. Atienza

9
New cards

Honorable Manila Mayor Jose “Lito” Atienza

respondent of IBP v. Atienza

10
New cards

REVERSED Appeal

ruling of IBP v. Atienza

11
New cards

Article 201 (2)(b)(3, 5) of the Revised Penal Code in relation to Section 6 of Republic Act No. 10175

violation in People v. Pagente

12
New cards

Amadeus Fernando Pagente alias Pura Luka Vega

accused in People v. Pagente

13
New cards

June 10, 2025

date of People v. Pagente ruling

14
New cards

Offenses against Decency and Good Customs

Article 201 title

15
New cards

(3) offend any race or religion; (5) are contrary to law, public order, morals and good customs, established policies, lawful orders, decrees and edicts

what are the provisions of Article 201 (2)(b)

16
New cards

Section 6 of Republic Act No. 10175

Alongside criminal charges, the accused in People v. Pagente is also liable under what law?

17
New cards

Cybercrime Prevention Act

Section 6 of Republic Act No. 10175 title

18
New cards

Accused ACQUITTED

ruling of People v. Pagente

19
New cards

January 21, 2015

date of Diocese v. COMELEC ruling

20
New cards

The Most Rev. Bishop Vicente B. Navarra

represented The Diocese of Bacolod in Diocese v. COMELEC

21
New cards

COMELEC and Election Officer of Bacolod Atty. Mavil V. Majarucon

respondents in Diocese v. COMELEC

22
New cards

Petition GRANTED

ruling of Diocese v. COMELEC