SUPREME COURT - key examples of Judicial Review and what they show

0.0(0)
studied byStudied by 0 people
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
Card Sorting

1/4

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Study Analytics
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced

No study sessions yet.

5 Terms

1
New cards

The 2019 Prorogation case (Miller v The PM)

on 29 Aug - BOJO temporarily suspended Parliament.

  • Bojo and the govt argued that the prorogation was a routine one that ordinarily follows the selection of a new PM

  • but crictics argues that the prorogation was intended to avoid parliamentary scrutiny of the govt’s Brexit plans and to make it harder for Parliament to block a no - deal Brexit

2
New cards

+

The SC unanimously ruled that the prorogation was = unlawful, reversing the prorogation and reinstating parliament

The SC noted that the sovereignty of Parliament would be undermined ‘as the foundational principle of our constitution’ if prerogative power to prorouge could be used to ‘prevent P from excersising its legislative authority’

3
New cards

=

this shows how the SC was able to check the power of the govt and uphold parliamentary sovereignty and the power of P to scruntinse the govt.

4
New cards

2- The 2016 Article 50 case

Gina Miller argued that the govt couldn’t give notice of Britain’s intention to leave the EU under article 50 without Parliament giving it’s approval.

  • the govt disagreed and argued it could use its executive powers to make or unmake treaties with foreign committees.

  • by an 8-3 majority, the court decided against the govt, arguing the removal of rights conferred by P and that P should therefore have to give its consent

5
New cards

+

the case also ruled that the Scottish, Welsh and NI p’s had no rogjts to veto an AofP giving consent to article 50

  • This therefore also shows how the SC i sbale to check the power of the executive and iphold parilamentary sovereginty.