1/107
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
S-S learning
The conditioned stimulus activates a mental representation of the unconditioned stimulus, meaning learning occurs between stimuli.
S-R learning
The conditioned stimulus becomes directly linked to the response so the CS triggers the CR without activating a representation of the US.
CS (Conditioned Stimulus)
A previously neutral stimulus that comes to predict the unconditioned stimulus through learning.
US (Unconditioned Stimulus)
A stimulus that naturally elicits a response without prior learning.
UR (Unconditioned Response)
The reflexive response produced by the unconditioned stimulus.
CR (Conditioned Response)
The learned response elicited by the conditioned stimulus after conditioning.
Facilitation
The CS enhances or prepares the response to the US.
Diminution
The CS reduces the magnitude of the response normally elicited by the US.
CR substitution
The conditioned response mimics the unconditioned response.
Opponent-like CR
The conditioned response is opposite the unconditioned response.
Autoshaping
A conditioned stimulus predicting food automatically elicits a response directed toward the CS itself (e.g., pigeons peck a key light paired with grain).
Conditioned emotional response (CER)
A Pavlovian conditioning paradigm where a CS associated with shock suppresses ongoing behavior (e.g., lever pressing).
Eyeblink conditioning
Classical conditioning paradigm where a CS predicts an air puff to the eye causing a blink.
Conditioned taste aversion
Learning in which a taste becomes associated with illness and is avoided even after long delays.
Little Albert experiment
Demonstrated conditioned fear by pairing a white rat with a loud noise.
McCollough Effect
A perceptual conditioning effect where exposure to colored gratings alters later color perception.
Delay conditioning
The CS begins before the US and overlaps with it.
Trace conditioning
A form of classical conditioning in which the CS ends before the US begins, requiring the organism to maintain a memory trace of the CS during the gap.
Simultaneous conditioning
The CS and US occur at the same time.
Backward conditioning
The US occurs before the CS.
Trace conditioning brain region
Requires the hippocampus because the organism must maintain a memory trace of the CS during the gap.
Delay eyeblink conditioning brain circuit
Primarily mediated by cerebellar circuits involved in the eyeblink reflex pathway.
Biological constraints
Evolutionary predispositions that make certain stimulus-outcome associations easier or harder to learn.
Garcia experiment
Showed rats easily associate taste with illness but not taste with shock, demonstrating biological constraints.
Preparedness
The evolutionary tendency to learn certain associations more readily than others.
US devaluation technique
Method used to determine whether learning is S-S or S-R by reducing the value of the US after conditioning.
Evidence for S-S learning
If the US is devalued and the conditioned response decreases, the organism must represent the US.
Evidence for S-R learning
If the US is devalued but the conditioned response remains unchanged, the CS directly triggers the response.
R-O association
A response-outcome relationship characteristic of instrumental learning.
Pavlovian association
A stimulus-stimulus relationship independent of behavior.
Master-Yoke design
Experimental design used to determine whether behavior is driven by instrumental or Pavlovian learning.
Master group
The subject's behavior determines whether the outcome occurs.
Yoked group
Receives the same pattern of stimuli as the master but has no control over outcomes.
Instrumental learning prediction
In a master-yoke design, only the master group learns because behavior controls the outcome.
Pavlovian learning prediction
Both master and yoked groups show learning because behavior does not control the outcome.
Contiguity theory
The idea that learning occurs when CS and US occur close together in time.
Challenge to contiguity theory
Taste aversion learning occurs even when many hours separate the taste and illness.
Overshadowing
When two CSs are paired with a US simultaneously, the more salient CS acquires stronger associative strength while the less salient CS acquires weaker learning.
Blocking
Prior conditioning to one CS prevents learning about a new CS because the US is already fully predicted.
CS-US contingency
The statistical relationship between the presence of a CS and the probability of the US.
Excitatory conditioning
P(US | CS) is greater than P(US | no CS).
Conditioned inhibition
A stimulus that signals the absence of the US and acquires negative associative strength when paired with an excitatory CS.
No learning contingency
P(US | CS) equals P(US | no CS).
Prediction error
The difference between the expected value of an outcome and the actual outcome.
Positive prediction error
The outcome is better than expected.
Negative prediction error
The outcome is worse than expected.
Rescorla-Wagner model
A mathematical model describing how associative strength changes during conditioning based on prediction error.
Lambda (λ)
The maximum associative strength supported by the US.
Associative strength (V)
The strength of the association between a CS and the US.
Total associative strength (VT)
The sum of associative strengths of all CSs present on a trial.
Alpha (α)
The salience or learning rate parameter for the CS.
Beta (β)
The learning rate parameter for the US.
Rescorla-Wagner equation
ΔV = αβ(λ − VT).
Meaning of (λ − VT)
The prediction error representing the difference between expected and actual US.
Additivity rule
The total associative strength of compound stimuli equals the sum of the strengths of each component stimulus.
Blocking explanation in Rescorla-Wagner
If VT equals λ, prediction error is zero and no new learning occurs.
Overshadowing explanation in Rescorla-Wagner
More salient stimuli gain more associative strength than less salient stimuli.
US pre-exposure effect
Prior exposure to the US slows later conditioning to a CS because the context predicts the US.
Over-expectation effect
Combining two well-trained CSs causes associative strength to decrease because the US is overpredicted.
Latent inhibition
Prior exposure to a CS alone reduces later conditioning to that CS.
Synaptic plasticity
Long-lasting changes in synaptic strength that support learning and memory.
Long-Term Potentiation (LTP)
A strengthening of synaptic connections following high-frequency stimulation.
Long-Term Depression (LTD)
A weakening of synaptic connections following low-frequency stimulation.
Cooperativity (LTP)
Two moderate synaptic inputs occurring together can produce LTP.
Associativity (LTP)
A weak input can undergo LTP when paired with a strong input onto the same neuron.
Purpose of LTD
Prevents neural networks from becoming saturated with strong synapses.
Single-cell recording
Method that measures electrical activity of individual neurons.
Patch clamp
Technique measuring electrical currents through ion channels in neurons.
Immediate early genes (e.g., cFOS)
Markers used to detect neural activation after learning.
fMRI
Method used to measure regional brain activity through changes in blood flow.
Lesion methods
Destroy specific brain regions to determine their role in behavior.
Temporary lesion methods
Use drugs or reversible techniques to temporarily inactivate brain regions.
Optogenetics
Method using genetically modified neurons that can be activated with light.
DREADDs
Genetically engineered receptors that allow neurons to be controlled with otherwise inert drugs.
Aplysia conditioning model
Invertebrate model used to study synaptic mechanisms of classical conditioning.
Key finding from Aplysia research
Classical conditioning produces changes at the synaptic level.
Eyeblink conditioning brain structure
The cerebellum.
Amygdala function
Processes fear and emotional learning.
Hippocampus function
Involved in contextual learning, spatial memory, and trace conditioning.
Implicit learning
Learning that occurs without conscious awareness.
Explicit learning
Learning that requires conscious awareness and cognitive mediation.
Example of implicit learning
Delay eyeblink conditioning.
Example of explicit learning
Trace eyeblink conditioning.
Cognitive mediation
Mental processes occur between stimulus and response rather than simple S-R associations.
Mediated acquisition
Learning about a stimulus indirectly through associations with another stimulus.
Mediated extinction
Extinction occurring indirectly through associations with another stimulus.
Spatial learning
Learning about the spatial environment and locations of important stimuli.
Radial arm maze
Task used to study spatial memory where animals remember which arms contain rewards.
Evidence from radial arm maze
Animals remember spatial locations of previously rewarded arms.
Effect of rotating maze cues
Performance declines because spatial memory relies on environmental cues.
Morris water maze
Task where animals must locate a hidden platform in water using spatial cues.
Hippocampus role in Morris water maze
Required for forming spatial maps of the environment.
Strategy without hippocampus in Morris water maze
Animals rely on visible cues rather than spatial mapping.
Context conditioning
Learning where environmental context predicts the US.
Role of hippocampus in context conditioning
Essential for encoding contextual representations.
Effect of immediate hippocampal lesion
Context memory is disrupted.
Effect of delayed hippocampal lesion
Context memory remains intact due to consolidation in cortex.
Memory consolidation
Process where memories gradually become independent of the hippocampus.
Configural relations
Learning where the meaning of a stimulus depends on its combination with other stimuli.
Linearly separable problem
Stimuli independently predict outcomes.