1/59
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
biomarker
endogenous or injected molecules whose presence or metabolism correlates with important disease related physiological processes and disease outcomes
the accuracy of biomarkers vary, so not all biomarkers are suitable for medical development
types of biomarkers
molecular (blood glucose)
histologic
radiographic (tumor size)
physiologic (blood pressure)
biological marker
measurable indicator that can tell us something about a person’s health or disease state: disease process, biological process, a response to treatment or medicine, or a psychological condition
biomarker characteristics
objectively measured & evaluated
indicator of normal biological or pathological processes, or response to therapeutic intervention
biological molecule found in blood, other body fluids, or tissues
sign of normal or abnormal process, or condition of disease
how well body responds to a treatment
AKA molecular marker & signature molecule
ideal biomarker characteristics
have great sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, high predictive value
safe and easy to measure
cost-efficient to follow up
modifiable with treatment
consistent across gender and ethnic groups
validation of biomarkers
accuracy
precision
limit of detection
interference, cross-reactivity
sample preparation/conditions
performance around the cut-off
potential for carryover, cross-hybridization
genomics
genome sequencing
genome variation
genome annotation
transcriptomics
microarrays
gene expression data
proteomics
mass spectrometry
protein chips
metabolomics
NMR
Mass spectrometry
other technologies for biomarker discorvery
fluorescent indicators
lab-on-chip
nuclear magnetic resonance
mass spectrometry / liquid chromatography
nanobiotechnology
imaging
phase I of biomarker evaluation
identified markers are prioritized based on their diagnostic/prognostic/theraputic value that could suggest their evolution into routine clinical use
phase II of biomarker evaluation
establishing an assay with clear intended clinical use. The assays need to be validated for reproducibility and shown to be portable among different laboratories
phase III of biomarker evaluation
an investigator evaluates the sensitivity and specificity of the test for the detection of diseases that have yet to be detected clinically
phase IV of biomarker evaluation
evaluates the sensitivity and specificity of the test on a prospective cohort. An investigator can estimate the false referral rate based on tested biomarkers and describe the extent and characteristics of the disease detected
phase V of biomarker evaluation
evaluates the overall benefits and risks of the new diagnostic test on the screened population
biomarkers in use
diagnosis in symptomatic patients
early detection (screening)
monitoring of disease
biomarkers for predicting the future
risk assessment
prognosis
prediction
ideal marker for diagnosis
should have great sensitivity (>0.9), specificity (>0.9), and accuracy in reflecting total disease burden
a tumor marker should also be prognostic of outcome and treatment
samples for biomarker detection
blood, urine, tissue or other body fluids samples
biomarker and screening
real time indicators of the presence of cancer
marker must be highly specific, minimize false positive and negatives
must be able to clearly reflect the different stages of disease
marker must be easily detected without complicated medical procedures
the disease markers released to serum and urine are good targets for application of early screening
should be cost effective
safety (monitoring) biomarkers
constantly monitored safety lab biomarkers can act as common vital organ function tests applied across different therapeutic areas or as specialized testing applied to detect unique toxicities
prognosis biomarkers
may provide information about a patients expected outcome
help determine which cancers may grow rapidly and/or metastasize
predicting biomarker
may be used to predict a patient’s response to treatment
or determine the optimal drug dose or type used for breast cancer tx
(since breast cancer is heterogenous disease, different cancers respond different to same treatments)
monitoring biomarker
used to predict and monitor a patients breast cancer recurrence of the disease AFTER treatment
efficacy biomarkers
demonstrate a change in all or at least a good proportion of treated subjects
the more positive the biomarker, the higher the efficacy
efficacy biomarker classifications
surrogate biomarkers/endpoints
predictive biomarkers
pharmacodynamic biomarkers
prognostic biomarkers
surrogate endpoints
laboratory or physical measurement used in clinical trials to indicate a drug’s response and can be used in place of a clinical endpoint
used to assess the benefit or harm of a therapeutic drug agent
can provide the concept for which a candidate drug is to be used
validated biomarkers as surrogate endpoints advantages
they might be able to be measured earlier, more easily, or frequently, with high precision
may be less affected by other treatments, reduce sample size required, and allow for faster decisions
ethical advantages in diseases with poor prognosis
surrogate biomarker examples
blood pressure (hypertension)
cholesterol, LDL (dyslipidiemia)
Glycosylated hemoglobin (diabetes)
intraocular pressure (glaucoma)
biomarkers tumor shrinkage, response rate (cancer)
predictive biomarkers
stratify patient population into responders and non responders to treatment
predict whether or not a drug will have the intended effect
forecast the extent to which a drug can be effective and/or toxic in different patient populations
predict the risk or outcome of a disease in a patient population without the involvement of therapy
limitation for biomarkers
expensive
storage
laboratory errors
normal range is difficult to establish
lack of making different selections before initiating discovery phase
lack in biomarker characterization/validation strategies
robustness of analysis techniques used in clinical trials
challenges of using biomarkers in medicine development
technical challenges
regulatory challenges
ethical challenges
technical challenges
must be validated by scientific evidence to ensure that the biomarker is accurate, reliable, sensitive, and specific
show a reasonable relationship to the disease being studied
enough “predictive ability?”
regulatory challenges
developers of novel biomarkers are being encouraged to engage with regulators at an early stage
validating biomarkers to meet regulatory standards can be complex and expensive
if intended to be used as a surrogate endpoint
a dedicated clinical trial is required to test the link between the biomarker and clinical endpoint
ethical challenges
linked to storage and use of tissue samples and the associated handling of personal medical data
targeted medicine
medicine is developed for people who fall outside of the population treated
tumor marker may be present in
blood circulation
body cavity fluids
cell membranes
cell cytoplasm
DNA
biochemical properties of good tumor marker
should be present in or produced by the tumor itself
not be present in healthy tissues
plasma level should be at a minimum in healthy subjects
specific for a tissue, and different immunological properties when it is synthesized on other tissues
plasma level should be in proportion to the size of tumor and activity of tumor
half life should not be long
present at a detectable level even if the tumor size is small
useful for prediction and the recurrence of the tumor
uses of tumor markers
screening general population
differential diagnosis of symptomatic patients
clinical staging of cancer
estimating tumor volume
prognostic indicator for disease progression
evaluating success of tx
detect recurrence of cancer
monitoring response to therapy
radioimmunolocalaization of tumor masses
serum level of marker reflects tumor burden
level of a marker may be used as a prognostic indicator for disease progression and patient survival
after tx the marker should decrease
the magnitude of marker reduction may reflect the degree of tx success
in recurrence, the marker increases again
tumor marker values correlate with the effectiveness of tx
biomarkers in periodontal disease
GCF, saliva, serum
saliva
contains mix of enzymes, proteins, water, antibodies, ions, and mucins
produced by parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands
unique biochemical composition
salivary biomarkers
enzymes (-ase)
immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM)
protein
phenotypic marker (keratin)
host cell (leukocytes)
ion (calcium)
hormones (cortisol)
bacteria
volatile compounds (sulphide, marcaptan, picolines, pyridines)
IL 1b
proinflammatory cytokine
function: osteoclastic activity in periodontitis
influence: immune cell recruitment, cell proliferation, tissue destruction, vascular smooth muscle cell contraction
alkaline phosphatase (ALP)
mixed saliva of adult periodontitis patients revealed the highest enzyme activities
associated with alveolar bone loss (key feature of PD disease)
C-reactive protein (CRP)
synthesized in liver
systemic marker and indicator of acute phase of an inflammatory response
circulating CRP reaches saliva via GCF or salivary glands
high levels associated with chronic and aggressive periodontal disease
Gingival Crevicular Fluid
thought to be an inflammatory exudate or to cleanse material from the crevice
have antimicrobial properties & antibody activity
GCF biomarkers
host-derived enzymes and their inhibitors
tissue breakdown products
inflammatory mediators and host response modifiers
Matrix Metalloproteinases
key enzyme in extracellular collagen matrix degradation
significantly increases he risk of periodontal disease
MMP-8 indicates disease severity but also disease activity
MMP-1 (interstitial collagenase) also appeared to be activated in periodontitis
beta glucuronidase
degradation of the connective tissue ground substance: glycoproteins, proteoglycans
may be obtained from both saliva and GCF
positively associated with spirochetes, P. Gingivalis, P. intermedia
negatively associated with cocci
aspartate amino transferase (AST)
cell death within the periodontal tissues
neutrophil elastase
marker of intracrevicular PMN activity, anti-bacterial activity
Cathepsin B
intracellular collagenolytic breakdown
osteocalcin
most abundant non-collagenous protein of mineralized tissue, it is a small calcium-binding protein of bone
source: osteoblasts
function: promotes hydroxyapatite binding and accumulation of bone, chemotactically attracts osteoclast progenitor cells and blood monocytes
GCF osteocalcin
has a positive correlation with clinical parameters in a cross-sectional study of patients with periodontitis
higher in both periodontitis and gingivitis patients
contradicting results has potential as a bone specific marker but not as a predictive indicator for periodontal disease
Osteopontin
found in bone matrix
highly concentrated at sites where osteoclasts are attached to the underlying mineral surface
source: osteoblasts and osteoclasts
function: holds a dual function in bone maturation
pro-inflammatory cytokines
monocytes, macrophages, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells respond to plaque microorganisms by secreting chemokines and inflammatory cytokines (TNF-a, PGE2, IL-1b, IL6)
can be obtained from GCF and saliva (IL1, TNF-a)
TNF-a
origin: mononuclear phagocyte
the main stimulus for release is the LPS of bacterial cell walls
functions: bone resorption, inhibit bone collagen synthesis, induce collagenases, stimulate osteoclast differentiation in the presence of M-CSF
act synergistically with cytokines and induces release of IL-1
IL-6
produced by various cells such as activated monocytes or macrophages, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts
Functions: B cells promote growth and facilitate maturation of the b cells causing immunoglobulin secretion, osteoclast formation and activity
higher in areas of gingival inflammation, plays a role in bone resorption
IL-17
proinflammatory cytokine produced by T-helper 17 cells
stimulate carious cell types to produce other inflammatory cytokines and chemokines
supports immune responses resulting in osteoclastic bone resorption