1/45
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Australopithecus Afarensis
First clear evidence of bipedalism, increased sexual dimorphism, “Lucy”
Homo Habilis
Created tools, larger brain, ate meat
Homo Erectus
Used fire and tools, migrated out of Africa, larger brain than Homo habilis, even more distinct sexual dimorphism, likely started pair bonding, shared responsibilities in childrearing
Homo Neanderthalensis
Genetically closest to Homo sapiens, interbred with Homo sapiens
Homo Sapiens
Modern humans, most advanced language, culture, and tools
Genetic Similarities Between Chimps and Humans
99.8% similar; single nucleotide substitutions = 1.2% different, duplications and insertions = 3-4% different)
Human-Chimp Divergence
4.5-6 million yrs
Human-Gorilla Divergence
6-8 million yrs
Human-Orangutan Divergence
12-16 million yrs
Evidence for Chr. 2 Fusion
-banding pattern matches 2 separate chimp chr.
-2 centromeres
-internal telomeres
FOXP1
Brain development and movement coordination
FOXP2
Speech/language development and motor control in humans
FOXP3
Regulates immune system
FOXP4
Neural and lung development
FOXP2 Importance to Human Evolution
Enabled speech, language learning, and cultural transmission
FOXP2 Difference Between Humans and Primates
2 nucleotide substitution
FOXP2 on Brain Regions
-Cortex (planning)
-Striatum (motor learning/sequencing)
-Cerebellum (coordination).
FOXP2 in Mice Ultrasonic Whistles
-Wild type: high amount of whistles
-Heterozygous: mild brain and vocal problems
-Homozygous: severe brain malformations and no vocalization
FOXP2 in Songbirds
Song learning and imitation
FOXP2 Location
Human chr. 7q31
Learning Feedback Loop: Preferred Outcome
Preferred phenome, song, temperature → comparator
Learning Feedback Loop: Comparator
Comparing expected vs. actual performance → error signal
Learning Feedback Loop: Motor System
Receives error signal → calculates physical response
Learning Feedback Loop: Behavior Produced
From motor system → physical response
Learning Feedback Loop: Outcome Perceived
Outcome of physical response → comparator
Contralateral Control
Brain's hemispheres control the opposite side of the body
Left Hemisphere
Contains Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas; typically dominant for language
Brain Regions for Hearing
Auditory cortex in temporal lobe (processes sound) and Wernicke’s area (comprehends words)
Brain Regions for Speaking
Broca’s area in frontal lobe (produces speech) and M1/primary motor cortex (mouth and tongue movement)
Aphasia
Inability to comprehend/formulate language
Broca’s Aphasia
x - fluency, repetition
o - comprehension
Wernicke’s Aphasia
x - comprehension, repetition
o - fluency
Conduction Aphasia
x - repetition
o - fluency, comprehension
Transcortial Motor Aphasia
x - fluency
o - comprehension, repetition
Transcortial Sensory Aphasia
x - comprehension
o - fluency, repetition
Transcortial Mixed Aphasia
x - fluency, comprehension
o - repetition
Global Aphasia
x - fluency, comprehension, repetition
Population-Level Chimp Handedness
Tools (RH), termite fishing (LH), nutcracking (RH), wadge dipping (slight RH)
Chimp Handedness Heritability
Strong mother → offspring; either genetic or learned
Evidence for Neanderthal Speech
Similar hyoid bone shape/position, FOXP2, longer oral cavity, shorter pharynx → similar vocal anatomy and breathing control
Evidence for Human-Neanderthal Interbreeding
Modern Eurasian genome is 1-4% Neanderthal, shared genes (like FOXP2) through gene flow
Shared FOXP2 in Humans and Neanderthals
Speech may predate humans/Neanderthals from common ancestor → interbreeding may have reinforced speech genes
Vocal Tract Reconstruction
Helps estimate Neanderthal speech ability
Sandra Martelli’s Study on Human vs. Neanderthal Speech Capability
Different mouth/nasal cavity shape → may not have full modern vowel and consonant capacity, but could probably comprehend
Speech vs. Choking Risk
Lowered larynx and flexible tongue make speech possible → pushes epiglottis to anatomical limit, increases choking risk
Infant/Chimp vs Adult Larynx Position
-Infant/chimp: high → breathe while swallow, limited vocal range
-Adult: low → longer pharynx, reshaped oral cavity for full vowel range