1/40
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
natural rights
People are born with certain rights that are given to them by their Creator, so they can’t be taken away by a monarch
state of nature
comes before government, where humans are free
social contract
to protect their natural rights, people willingly give over some of their power to the government
popular sovereignty
by nature, the power to govern is in the hands of the people
republicanism
People elect leaders to represent them and create laws in the public interest
constitutional convention/philadelphia convention 1787
A new constitution was drafted
james madison
who wrote the constitution
representative republic
people elect office representatives who would legislate on behalf of the people
pure democracy
everyone gets a vote
participatory democracy
broad participation, citizens vote on laws directly
initiative
When voters put a measure on a ballot, they want it passed into law
referendum
people oppose a law that is passed by their legislature, and if it is unpopular enough they can call for a vote to defeat that law
elite democracy
limited participation only by a few, well-educated, and informed group of people who are qualified enough to direct the nation
plurist democracy
group-based acitivism by regular people who work to impact political decision-making (interest groups)
July 1776
Americans gained independence from Britain
Articles of Confederation
states held most power, weak central government, Congress was only branch
13 states had to agree to amend, Congress had no power to raise taxes, no national currency, no power to raise national army
weaknesses of Articles of Confederation
Shay’s rebellion
Congress had no money, and Revolutionary soldiers weren’t getting paid, and the government wouldn’t help with relief, so a dude raised a militia and started shooting but when they started shooting the MA governer asked for the help of the national army BUT THERE IS NO NATIONAL ARMY (they lost btw even without the over side having an army)
great compromise
debate over how people would be represented in the new Congress
virginia plan
representatives should be apportioned by population
representatives should be apportioned equally
new jersey plan
electoral college
each state is ginve the same number of electors as they have representatives in Congress
3/5 compromise
how enslaved people would count for representation in the House of Representatives
proposal
Congress or a state convention proposes an amendment
2/3
how many votes needed to pass an amendment from proposal stage
3/4
how many states have to ratify an amendment in order for it to become official
separation of power
power is separated; no one branch of government holds all authority
checks and balances
each branch has the power to check the other branches
stakeholder
anyone with a vested interest in the outcome of policymaking
federalism
shared power between the states and the federal government
exclusive powers
powers delegated to federal government
concurrent powers
powers both the national and state governments share
reserved powers
powers kept by the states
fiscal federalism
Congress establishes national standards, then directs the funds to states that comply with the standards, and withholds from those that don’t
categorical grant
gives federal money to the states as long as they comply with specific federal standards
block grants
federal money is given to the states to be spent in a broad category
mandates
require states to follow federal directives, and gives the money to the states so that they can carry out the directives
unfunded mandate
government sets a mandate, but doesn’t give money to help the states comply
full faith and credit clause
each state must respect the other’s laws
laboratories for democracy
states will pass certain laws, then representatives will look at how the states are doing with those laws and decide if it should be implemented nationally
legalization of marijuana
example of laboratories for democracy