1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
weapons focus - unreliable
considered unreliable due to weapons focus theory
eyewitness will notice and remember details about the crime if a weapon is present
weapons focus - unreliable: loftus et al
lab exp to test impact of WF on accuracy of recall
p’s into 2 conditions watching people move through queue at taco restaurant
one group saw customer hand cashier bill, other saw customer pull a gun
monitoring eye movements p’s in gun condition spent longer fixated on gun
therefore, weapons focus can easily distort any accounts
weapons focus: strength evaluation
p’s watched videos
no experienced actual armed robbery
avoiding reliving trauma or causing distress
weapons focus - reliable
eyewitness accounts have been shown to remain accurate despite a weapon being present
weapons focus - reliable: yuille and cutshall
case study on eyewitness memory of a crime
canada, man attempted to rob a gunshop - shot 6 times and killed by owner
police investigated witnesses
4 months after first interview, interviewed 13 witnesses
witnesses recalled incidence in great detail and accounts did not alter after 2 misleading questions
therefore, presence of weapon, ewt can still be reliable and remain consistent over time
weapons focus - reliable: case study evaluation
in depth investigation into a unique person or group
presence of weapon may not always effect the ewt
this case study may have been a coincidence
post event information - unreliable
can easily be manipulated and contaminated by external factors
post event information - unreliable: gabbert et al
60 students from uni of aberdeen, 60 adults from local community watch video of girl stealing from wallet
either tested individually or in pairs
p’s in cowitness group were told watched same video but had seen diff perspectives of the same crime and only one person saw girl stealing
cowitness group discussed crime, all p’s completed questionaire
71% of cowitness group recalled info they hadn’t seen
60% said the girl was guilty, though no crime was observed
therefore, not reliable as memoru can be contaminated to influence accuracy of event
post event information - unreliable: ethical implications
ewt declared unreliable, devalues witness’ experience
decrease in people contributing court case evidence
could make difference between wrongful conviction and criminal being charged
post event information - reliable
memories can be resistant to false information
post event information - reliable: loftus
post event information - reliable: social implications
if ewt reliable, fairer sentencing
good welath of evidence to use in court cases
ewt used alongside CCTW, dna and physical evidence
more evidence → increase likelihood of case being solved fairly
emotions - unreliable
an influx of strong emotions can contaminate the accuracy of memories
emotions - unreliable: peters
used p’s who were visiting a health centre for routine injections
researcher took details and recruited, got injection from a nurse then went home
1 week later, asked to see nurse and researcher from set of photos
more likely to identify researcher
meeting researcher → low anxiety, injection → high anxiety - results predicted using inverted u theory
therefore, crimes are often high stress, if ewt too stressed, recall of info will be poor
emotions - unreliable: inverted u theory
low levels of anxiety → memory accuracy is low but as anxiety increases so does cognitive performance until it reaches an optimal level
after any increase in anxiety causes memory accuracy to drop significantly
emotions - reliable
in high stress situations, witnesses can still recall information accurately
emotions - reliable: christianson and hubinette
110 witnesses of 22 bank robberies interviewed sometime after
victims recall of robber's clothing and behaviour accurate, and accuracy evident 15 months later
oppposing to results that weapons focus and inverted u theory would predict
flashbulb memories
therefore, even in high stress situations, accurate retain of key details over an extended period, likely due to flashbulb memories
emotions - reliable: flashbulb memories
vivid memory associated with an emotional event including details such as where they were and what they were doing
may play a role in enhancing reliability of eye witness testimony
emotions - reliable: mundane realism
interview and time left between crime and interview are representative of an EWT
information recalled will have higher level of validity
reliability of eyewitness testimony conclusion
unclear whether ewt is effective or not - evidence to support both sides
yes: memory difficult to manipulate, accounts more valid
no: weapons focus, witness unreliable
therefore, ewt should still be used but not independently
used with cctv and dna which are objective, unable to manipulate