1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
---|
No study sessions yet.
kohlberg’s theory of moral development
everyone progresses through the levels and stages ignorer but some progress further than others
6 stages
pre conventional level (4-10 years) : avoiding punishment and self interest
conventional level : good boy attitude and law and order morality
post conventional level : social contract and principle
aim
to carry out research to explain and support his theory that moral thinking changes over time
method
longitudinal study (12 years)
sample
75 American boys
aged between 10 - 16 years old (at the start of the study)
procedure
at 3 yearly intervals, boys were presented with hypothetical moral dilemmas and asked what they would do and explain why
he looked at motive given for rule obedience and moral action and the value of human life by asking moral dilemmas (e.g. the Heinz situation)
boys asked questions like ‘should Heinz have stolen the drugs?’ and ‘would it make any difference if the person dying was a stranger?’
study repeated in Taiwan, Mexico, Canada and the uk
changed the situation to the culture
results
found his stages were reflected in answers
results showed 50% of ppts were consistent in their stage of moral reasoning regardless of the dilemma
ppts showed progress through the stages with increased age
not all ppts made it through to stage 6
at the age of 16, stage 5 more noticeable in the us than Mexico or Taiwan
in the us, Mexico and Taiwan, middle class children were found to be more advanced than matched lower class children
no differences in moral development across different regions
conclusions
moral development occurs in the same sequence regardless of where a child grows up (supports nature debate to a large extent)
the nature of this sequence is not significantly affected by social, cultural or religious conditions
sampling bias
androcentric
smallish (only 75 ppts)
but was done across cultures
validity
potential research bias so low internal validity
also effects of social desirability so lowers internal validity as ppts may lie to seem more moral
low ecological validity as situations were hypothetical
ethics
quite ethical
parents will have given consent
was confidential
socially sensitive research s could create harmful stereotypes that some countries develop slower
research method
longitudinal study
attrition - people may drop out over time
type of data
qualitative as longer answers given so gives insight into why ppts would act a certain way
quantitative data as % of children progressing through each stage in order
reliability
research is replicable
may find same order or moral development but individual differences
used standardised procedures
question changed to suit younger ages so less control of extraneous variables
overall high reliability
practical applications
can ensure children are moving through the development stages
understanding of moral development in different cultures
can identify when children may have issues with their moral development
ethnocentrism
done across different cultures
questions changed to be more relatable to the country to lower ethnocentrism
overall western bias so slightly ethnocentric