1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Nativism/Generativism
Many aspects of language are not learned
Children are guided by innate, linguistic knowledge
Domain-specific
Language universals
Minimal input from
environment is needed
Constructivism
Most aspects of language are learned from environment using innate, non-linguistic abilities
Use of cognitive abilities like statistical comprehension & theory of mind
Domain-general
Language differences
Input from environment will affect development
Kids’ knowledge is initially imitative, limited to what they’ve heard
Behaviorism
Ivan Pavlov & B.F. Skinner
Only observable behavior can be used, not thoughts/ideas
Humans are machines with certain programming & complexity of language is only because of the complexity of human bodies
Conditioning & reinforcement
Stimulus —> Response —> Conditioning —> Reinforcement
Domain-General
Cognitive processes rely on broad/universal cognitive abilities like working memory, executive function, and general intelligence
Skills learned in one area can transfer to others because the same abilities handle everything
Domain-Specific
The mind has separate, dedicated structures designed for specific functions like language learning
Knowledge/growth in one structure does not automatically improve performance in another
Poverty of the Stimulus
An argument stating that children aren’t exposed to enough rich, detailed, or error-free language in their environment to learn all the complex rules of their native language on their own
The spoken language children hear around them is usually fragmented, casual, repetitive, and full of incomplete sentences so there must also be an innate element to language learning
Universal Grammar
Mental blueprint of how all languages are structured that helps children learn their language (think of language universals like subject/object, verb, sentences, etc)
Language Universals
Patterns, traits, or structural rules that appear across most/all human languages (like sentences, subject/object, syntax, etc)
Competence vs Performance
Competence is knowing the rules of your native language vs performance which is actually what happens (someone could be tired so they mess up word order but their performance doesn’t mean they have no competence
Course of Language Aquisition
0-12 months: Turn Taking, Babbling, Joint Attention, Word Comprehension
12-24 months: Holophrases (“up”, “milk”, etc)
18-30 months: Telegraphic Speech
2-4 years: Over regularization, Complex Sentences
Turn Taking
When children first babble they “converse” with their parents and others by taking turns speaking (even though they’re not saying real words)
Babbling
Vowel and consonant-vowel clusters like ma, ba, or da
Telegraphic Speech
2-3 word phrases used to communicate things (words are always in right place but grammatical words are always omittted)
Overregularization
Learning a rule and applying it to everything (including irregular instances “goed” or “drived”)
Child-Directed Speech
Speaking directly to a child using language directed at them
Maturational Hypothesis
As our bodies mature, our minds follow which is why we can learn more complex language as we grow older
SES Word Gap
Language Processing Efficiency/Speed
Critical Period Hypothesis (w arguments for/against it)
Immigrants who already know a language have a harder time learning English, especially more in adulthood. Also some birds and bees cannot replicate their communication dances correctly if taught them or introduced to a community later. (For)
There is a smooth decline from young age in ability to learn languages but there’s no specific cutoff to that (Against)
Non-Human Animal Communication Systems
Attempts to Teach Human Language to Non-Human Animals
Properties that Define Human Language
Reference (Arbitrary Symbols)
Productivity (Infinite Sentence Creation)
Intentionality (no ulterior motives)
Displaced (talk about things in past, present, AND future.)
Interchangeable (Everyone Understands it)
Cultural Transmission (rules and words get passed down from parents)
Language Evolution Theories
Faculty of Language (Narrow)
Faculty of Language (Broad)
Language Environments in Different Cultures
Mayans do not speak to their children directly meaning in order to learn babies have to be attentive and observational
Language Acquisition for Blind Children
Home Sign
Sign language that children develop with their parents
Pidgins & Creoles
Nicaraguan Sign Language
Learnability Theory
Positive & Negative Evidence
Implicit Negative Evidence (Statistical Noisy Feedback)
Effects of Child-Directed Speech on Language Development
Socioeconomic Differences in Children’s Language Environments
Lower SES are exposed to less words, therefore having a more limited vocabulary but learn at the same speed as other children