1/166
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced |
|---|
No study sessions yet.
Gender Socialization
process through which cultures teach children and adolescents about roles.
Traditionally sexuality is ______ controlled for girls, and ____ controlled for boys.
girls; boys
Girls Traditional Skills
household chores, taking care of younger children.
Boys Traditional Skills
direct skills and character skills.
provide, protect, procreate.
Female Genital Mutilation
considered a right of passage in some cultures.
not purposefully harmful → being tough enough.
Genital Mutilation Laws
legislations have been adopted against it → considered a violation of human rights.
Female Genital Mutilation Survey
“do you believe it’s required by your religion?”
“should it continue, or stop?”
Female Genital Mutilation Survey Results
high endorsement indicates it’s a requirement of their religion (e.g., Egypt, Guinea, etc).
huge drops in support by women in Chad, Egypt, Ethiopia → similar changes in religion around the same time.
looks like society based changes not generational trends.
Global Economy and Women
as value of info, tech, services increase → more financial benefit in training girls/women in the workplace than staying at home.
2/3 of countries have achieved parity education, remaining 1/3 have not.
18/19th Century American Girls
narrow socialization
housewife, teacher, nurse, seamstress.
intellectual work was considered unhealthy.
too weak to do physical work.
virginity until marriage!
20th Century American Girls
broader socialization, mentored by older women (watched what they did).
YMCA, girl scouts, etc.
Communal Manhood
preparing for community and family responsibilities (work & marriage).
17/18th century.
Self-made Manhood
individuals, independent, capable of self-control and making decisions.
volunteer organizations → stressed self-control, service to others, belief in god.'
freedom to engage with peers.
19th century.
Passionate Manhood
passionate emotions (anger, sexual, desire) self-expression and self-enjoyment.
20th century.
Do teachers perceive adolescent boys and girls differently?
teachers and student self-report.
children’s social behaviour rated by teacher, perception of self-competencies, gender roles, and self-description.
Teachers rated girls…
higher in prosocial behaviours.
correlated with feminine gender-role orientation → traditional gender stereotypes influence how girls are expected to behave.
Teachers rated boys…
higher in physical and relational aggression.
Girls rated themselves…
higher in behavioural conduct (prosocial behaviour).
Boys rated themselves…
higher in global self-worth and physical appearance.
Gender & Careers → Gender Copying Study
general knowledge questions paired with a female and male photo on an answer (deception as “past participants” who shared their answers)
“female” → art, performing arts, languages, care.
“male” → sports, machines, science, computers.
for harder questions players often relied on the “past participants” answer and picked the male or female answer due to stereotypes.
Gender & Careers → Gender Copying Results
female participants didn’t show as much bias as males.
male participants often only trusted/copied other men → even in more feminine domains (e.g., art, music, etc)
Gender & Careers → Stereotype Endorsement Study
“think about each subject/career listed”
who would most people think is better at this? (knowledge)
who do you think is better at this? (endorsement)
options: girls, boys, either, i don’t know
“what courses are you taking this year?” (high school students)
Gender & Careers → Stereotype Endorsement Results (Adolescents)
boys choose boys more often overall → underscore on feminine items, endorse masculine items.
not much gender stereotype in girls.
Gender & Careers → Stereotype Endorsement Results (Adults)
both men and women say other will view men as more capable.
but neither endorse those bias’ themselves.
Course Selection → Gender Stereotype Study
males chose 73% “masculine subjects.
females chose 47% “feminine” subjects.
Gender Intensification Hypothesis
psychological and behavioural differences between boys and girls become more pronounced during puberty because of intensified socialization pressures.
girls more self-conscious.
girls better at forming intimate friendships.
Gender Bias
Extent people make generalizations about characters in vignettes, with feminine/masculine/neutral characteristics.
extend people adopt stereotypically masculine/feminine traits.
Gender Bias Study Methods
“to what extent does this trait generalize to other boys/girls who look like this?”
scale 1 (almost none) to 7 (almost all).
words like adventurous (shows a boy), affectionate (shows a girl), creative (shows boy), superficial (shows a girl).
Gender Bias Study Results
gender bias shown in 9-year-olds.
highest endorsement of stereotypes shown in 15-year-olds.
body is changing → seek a mentor who understands (boys & boys, girls & girls).
girls show stereotypes more → but numbers are very similar to each other (not functionally sig.)
not convincing.
Gender Bias Study Findings
adolescents generalize in a way that aligns with gender stereotypes more than kids or emerging adults.
girls might be more likely to generalize (depends on context and questions).
being a girl/boy, women/man, or not is more salient during adolescence then any other time.
Differential Socialization
parents, teachers, peers, and society tend to treat girls/boys differently.
infancy: stereotypical toys & games for boys & girls.
childhood: stereotypical activities encouraged → teased if not ‘normal’.
Social Identity Theory
being in a social group makes you more prone to biases that favour your group; might explain gender socializations.
higher-status groups tend to guard in-group boundaries more than members of lower-status groups.
boys & fathers behave more negatively to cross-gender behaviours than girls and mothers.
potentially due to higher status in society.
not always intentional.
Adolescent Problems → Girls
emphasis on thinness leads to dieting, and EDs.
those overweight, obese, physically unattractive at risk for verbal, physical, relational and cyber harassment.
Adolescent Problems → Boys
expected to be (and are) more aggressive.
establishes hierarchies (strongest vs weakest).
Girls & Social Media
more exposed to photos that convey a very specific type of “attractiveness”.
thin, sexy look.
more time spent on ______ ______ → worsens body satisfaction.
exposure to “attractive” photos increases anxiety/body dissatisfaction.
exposure to diverse bodies/”reality checks” → improves body satisfaction.
Gender Stereotypes & Articles Study
college women evaluated quality of articles, written by either men or women.
women rated articles more highly if written by men (regardless of fields).
even though they were all written by the same person.
Gender Stereotypes → Values
in almost all countries:
“having a good job” is more important for men.
“being good-looking” more important for women.
being kind and honest → important for both.
The Truth About Gender Differences
there is more overlap than areas that don’t overlap…mostly. we are similar.
Smoking/Vaping Among High School Students
overall neither are very popular.
smoking cigarettes has declined over the years.
lots of socialization not to smoke has led to vaping.
vaping on the rise in adolescents.
Gender Identity
internal perception of one’s gender and how the individual chooses to label themselves.
Gender Expression
external display of one’s gender through clothing, grooming, demeanour, social behaviour, etc.
Gender Identity & Expression
subjective and personal.
can be dissonance between the two.
not necessarily perceived correctly by outward appearance & behaviours.
Gender Desirability Studies
original → asked college students to rate traits most desirable for an American man or woman.
studies after show consistency across countries and age groups.
feminine: nurturing & compliant
masculine: independent & aggressive
Androgyny
having a combination of both feminine and masculine traits in one person.
Gender Identity Issues
a group of people who have “not” being in common will be more heterogeneous than a group of people with something in common.
e.g., dogs are dogs but “not dogs” can be any other animal.
need to focus on supporting the individual not trying to group people.
Transgender Youth
without support have higher rates of mental health issues, more likely to become homeless, at risk for verbal & physical aggression, being bullied, attempting suicide.
some report resilience, greater self-esteem, and personal mastery.
Social Cognition
how we think about other individuals, social relations, and situations.
can be investigated through two concepts:
perspective taking & theory of mind.
adolescent egocentrism.
Cognitive and affective development during adolescence begins with _______, not with ______.
puberty; age.
Cognitive and Affective Development → Early Adolescence
puberty heightens emotional arous-ability, sensation-seeking, reward orientation.
feeling all emotions and don’t have the skills to deal with it.
Cognitive and Affective Development → Middle Adolescence
period of heightened vulnerability to risk-taking and problems in regulation of affect and behaviour.
Cognitive and Affective Development → Late Adolescence
maturation of frontal lobes facilitates regulatory competence.
stage to becoming an adult.
Social Development Evolutionarily
social skills play a key role in developing effective survival strategies.
dominance is greatly determined by social skills → capacity to gather allies, assistance during conflicts, etc.
baboons living in larger social groups tend to have larger brain sizes compared to smaller groups.
supports social brain hypothesis.
suggests group size effects brain size.
Social Reasoning
during adolescents it’s not solely dependent on cognitive skills, also influenced by factors such as:
motivations
desires
emotions
interests
perspective-taking skills
Theory of Mind (ToM) Development
ability to understand others’ mental states, intentions, emotions, desires and motives.
early signs emerge in infancy → preference for faces, attend to social interactions.
around 9 months → understand others act with goals and intentions.
age 4 → strongly develops and continues to develop into adulthood.
Theory of Mind Faucets
Emotional Self-Regulation:
effortful control, executive function.
Social Behaviour:
pro-sociality, aggression, peer relations.
Academic Achievement:
reading comprehension, writing, math, science abilities.
Perspective Taking
understanding one’s own perspective and involves comprehension of what others might think, feel, believe, or desire.
not extensively studied during adolescence.
Choudhury et al. → Perspective Taking
“you can’t go to your friends party, how do you feel”
your perspective and someone else’s.
found perspective taking develops with age → maturation of parietal and frontal lobes contributing to development.
improves during adolescence.
pre-adolescence struggle.
Sophisticated Theory of Mind: Faux Pas
when someone unintentionally says something hurtful → requires advanced ToM to understand it wasn’t purposeful.
involves taking speakers perspective to recognize their lack of awareness and the emotional impact of their words.
typically develops from mid-childhood into adolescence.
Moral judgement: Outcome or Intention?
in early childhood children tend to judge actions based on the outcome and ignore the intentions behind them.
by adolescence there’s a clearer understanding of intetions.
Two Process Model: Moral Judgement
refers to two components of moral judgement:
fast: emotional, intuitive responses.
slow: deliberate, conscious reasoning.
when intentions and outcomes don’t match, it can create a conflict in moral judgement.
older children judged a case of accidental harm as less “bad”.
older children judged a attempt of hard as more “bad” → even without an actual harmful event.
Constraint Hypothesis
understanding someone’s intent-based wrongness influences whether they deserve punishment.
Higher-Order Reasoning
taking multiple people’s perspectives on multiple levels.
ToM level 1: doesn’t require a lot of grammatical knowledge/understanding.
ToM level 4: requires more recursive thinking.
Who am I?
understanding yourself involves understanding others.
adolescence is often characterized by a period of self-discovery.
development is based on culture.
Identity Formation
Personal experiences, biological drives, culture.
past, present and future.
Erik Erikson
worked with war veterans and reflected on how soldiers often came back with “lost identity”.
identity can be most easily defined when it’s lost → allows you to miss it…want it back.
Erikson’s Stages
a crisis must be resolved at each stage.
there are 5 stages that encompass childhood-adolescence.
Stage 1: trust vs mistrust
Stage 2: autonomy vs shame/doubt
Stage 3: initiative vs guilt
Stage 4: industry vs inferiorityStage 5 (puberty): identity vs confusion
Stage 1: trust vs Mistrust
0-12 months.
parents’ actions/reactions gives the infant a sense that it’s alright to be oneself.
out of infants control.
Stage 2: Autonomy vs Shame/doubt
2-3 years
understanding that I can control my own actions.
interacting with objects/environment creates a reaction.
Stage 3: Initiative vs Guilt
preschool age.
can imagine and actively translate thought to action.
more intentional in actions.
Stage 4: Industry vs Inferiority
elementary school age.
practice skills and completing tasks that will be needed as adults.
can you accomplish skills/tasks required of you.
Stage 5: Identity vs Confusion
puberty.
to become faithful/committed to a worldview.
difficult to successfully get through this stage without properly getting through the others.
Criticism of Erikson’s Theory
imprecise formulations (terms not clearly defined).
what is autonomy really?
how can we test it empirically?
it’s just a matter of did you do or fail to do these things.
lack of evidence supporting “crises”
was there even an issue to begin with?
cultural bias → only applicable to societies where adolescents have choice in their social, ideological, and vocational roles.
James Marcia’s States
identity achievement
identity moratorium
identity foreclosure
identity diffusion
Identity Achievement
thoughtful, introspective, flexible strength in reactions to the world.
better able to adapt to new challenges.
score consistently high in autonomy, function well under stress, logical decision-making, not easily swayed by opinion, high satisfaction.
Identity Moratorium
can be animated, anxious, or quietly thoughtful.
good self-esteem, non-conformists, typically not in an intimate relationship.
more anxious than “achievement” or “foreclosure”, shy away from committed relationships, cognitive abilities similar to “achievement”.
Identity Foreclsure
similar to “achievement” (confident) initially.
inflexibility and defensiveness, happy, very committed to vocational and ideological values (especially parents’).
most authoritarian attitudes, approval-seeking, rely on others’ opinions, least anxious, least open to new experiences.
Identity Diffusion
most heterogeneous group, cultural limitations (dependent on), developmental deficits, superficial, unhappy (most).
low self-esteem, low autonomy, least capable of complex reasoning.
Social Responses to Marcia’s States
genuine opportunities must be given for adolescents to discover and realize their strengths.
Achieved: should be supported in their explorations rather than rewarding premature commitment.
Moratorium: seek most help but simply needs sound board, choices, and work study opportunities.
support their exploration
Foreclosure: slow counselling in terms of vocational options.
don’t try to change their minds immediately → make sure they’re identifying in healthy way.
Diffusion: professional therapy/counselling recommended.
Can identity status predict who transitions well from high school to university?
informational: actively seek out, evaluate, and use self-relevant info, self-reflection, problem-focused coping, conscientious (achieved or moratorium).
normative: conform to prescriptions and expectations of significant others, conscientious and agreeable, but need structure (foreclosed).
diffuse/avoidant: reluctant to face up to and confront personal problems & decisions (diffuse/avoidant).
University & Identity - Berzonsky & Kuk Study
Identity Diffusion was associated with lower levels of academic autonomy, informational processing improving and diffuse/avoidant styles making it worse.
female students had better established sense of educational purpose.
higher achievement and lower diffusion & moratorium led to stronger sense of educational purpose.
also higher with higher informational and normative scores & lower diffuse/avoidance.
identity diffusion & foreclosure associated with worse mature interpersonal relationships.
effect of diffusion reduced when processing style is considered.
bottom line: both contextual and stable understanding of self predicts extent to which adolescents adapt to demands of adult world.
Actual Self
self-concept
who you are on a basic level.
Possible Self
who you can become in the future.
more short-term.
Ideal Self
who you would like to be.
more long-term, high goals.
Feared Self
who you dread becoming.
who you are based on who you don’t want to be.
False Self
a self presented to others to fit in or impress.
Self-Esteem
overall sense of self-worth and well-being.
self-image, concept, perception are related because they contain evaluations of to what extent you are worthy and well.
Global Self-Esteem
universal findings that self esteem is high in childhood but drops during adolescence before rising again in adulthood.
girls self-esteem drops more than boys.
Cultural Self-Esteem
valued in individualistic cultures → something to strive for.
not as valued in collectivistic cultures → self-criticism is expected as proper etiquette.
Ethnic/Cultural Differences in Self-Esteem Study
compared black, white and asian students responses on collective self-esteem scale → no difference in overall self-esteem.
measured private (your evaluation of group) and public (belief of other’s evaluation of their group) self-esteem.
Ethnic/Cultural Differences in Self-Esteem Results
public vs private scales:
black students: no correlation (own evaluation differed)
white students: moderate correlation (somewhat matched)
asian students: strong correlation (private matched public)
Black Lives Matter Study
how do black high school boys think about the extent to which they “matter”?
mattering": value and significance indicated by the regard with which they are held, how they’re treated, and relational interests taken in them by society and their schools.
interviews with 17 boys.
Levels of Mattering (Study)
marginal mattering: baseline, minimal recognition that signals their insignificance.
partial mattering: being valued selectively for talents/attributes.
comprehensive mattering: aspirational mattering that liberates the individual form negativity, authentic understanding and validation.
Black Lives Matter Results
experiencing and resisting interpersonal marginal mattering:
teachers/administrators → racial bias and stereotypes.
majority white peers → no effort to connect.
among black boys → coming from poor neighbourhoods, creating mistrust.
mattering partially through selective love:
many athletes, felt they were valued only for their athletics.
Social Media Use and Effects
many studies show the harms.
if it was harmful to everyone it wouldn’t be used anymore → that isn’t the case.
good for some people, bad for others.
everything is on an individual level → can’t generalize.
there is a positive effect between increase social media use and increased self-esteem…
there is also an effect between decreased social media use and increased self-esteem…
Alone Time
due to increased autonomy and need for privacy, adolescents spend more time alone than during childhood.
according to Larson & Richards study:
boys: spend less time with family and that time then gets spent alone.
girls: spend less time with family and that time then gets spent with friends.
Does affect change with Age, and depending on who you’re with? (Larson & Richards)
how individuals interact with others is changing.
affect more positive when with friends, and the effect increased with age.
affect was more positive with family in Gr. 5 and Gr. 9.
no effect of age when alone.
Time Spent Alone or with Others → Bottom Line
influence of family declines during adolescence.
not much changes in time spent with friends.
alone time increased.
moods are highest with friends → effect increases from Gr. 5-9.
Cognitive Control Study
examined cognitive control under brief positive or negative emotional states.
participants aged 13-25.
happy, fearful, calm emotional expressions are presented as targets and non-targets.
watched performance before/during “random” events (bad sound plays, money to win).
everyone heard the noise at the end of the block and they all won $20 once.
Cognitive Control Results
adults were better at responding to fearful faces.
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex active in response to fearful cues.
adults had the best performance in response to calm cues during the negative context.
adults not using PFC during calm cues/negative context → not exerting much cog. control.
young adults and teens responded similarly → showed diminished cognitive control compared to adults
bottom line: young adults (18-21) are not emotionally mature in terms of PFC in the same way adults are.
Dimensions of Emotional Expression
frequency:
how many times in a given period.
Intensity:
how strong was the emotion.
Instability:
how much did emotions fluctuate in a given period.
Clarity:
to what extent can you identify and characterize your emotions.