Evidence (MK) - Rel

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/34

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering basic and discretionary relevance, similar occurrences, habit, and specialized public policy exclusions under the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Last updated 11:37 PM on 6/27/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

35 Terms

1
New cards

Relevance [FRE 401]

Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence, and the fact is of consequence in determining the action.

2
New cards

Probative

The characteristic of evidence having any tendency to make a fact more or less probable.

3
New cards

Material

A fact that is of consequence in determining the action, meaning it 'matters to the case'.

4
New cards

Default Rule of Admission [F.R.E. 402]

The principle that relevant evidence is admitted unless it violates a specific exclusionary rule of evidence, federal law, or is excluded under FRE 403.

5
New cards

“wee little brick” principle

The low bar for basic relevance where evidence is admissible as long as it fits somewhere in the structure of the case, regardless of whether it goes to the ultimate issue.

6
New cards

Limited Admissibility [FRE 105]

A rule stating that if evidence is admissible for one purpose or party but not another, the court, upon timely request, must restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.

7
New cards

Substantive Evidence

Evidence offered to prove a substantive issue in the case, such as fingerprints on a murder weapon to prove identity.

8
New cards

Impeachment Evidence

Evidence used to affect the weight of evidence by attacking a witness’s credibility.

9
New cards

“Judicial seesaw” [FRE 403]

A term for discretionary relevance where the trial judge balances the probative value of evidence against potential dangers like unfair prejudice or confusion.

10
New cards

Unfair Prejudice

A danger under FRE 403 where the jury may decide a case on an emotional basis rather than the facts.

11
New cards

Confusion of the issues

A danger under FRE 403 where evidence creates a “side issue” that distracts from the main case.

12
New cards

Misleading the jury

A danger under FRE 403 where the jury may give undue weight to certain evidence.

13
New cards

Cumulative Evidence

Evidence that is excluded under FRE 403 because it is a needless presentation of repetitive information.

14
New cards

Prior Similar False Claims

Evidence that a plaintiff previously filed similar false claims, which is generally admissible to prove the present claim is likely false.

15
New cards

Same Bodily Injury Exception

Evidence of prior accidents involving the same body part, admissible to show the plaintiff's condition resulted from a prior injury rather than the current accident.

16
New cards

Substantially Similar Accidents

Prior accidents caused by the same event or condition that are admissible to prove a dangerous condition, causation, or that the defendant had notice.

17
New cards

Habit

A person's regular response to a specific set of circumstances, characterized by frequency of conduct and particularity of circumstances.

18
New cards

Character

A person's general disposition or propensity with respect to general traits; unlike habit, it is generally inadmissible to prove conduct.

19
New cards

“SAPPI”

An acronym for the five public policy exclusions: Subsequent remedial measures, Attempts to compromise, Payments of medical expenses, Plea bargains, and Insurance.

20
New cards

Subsequent Remedial Measures

Repairs or changes made after an injury that are inadmissible to prove negligence, liability, product defects, or the need for warnings.

21
New cards

Feasibility

A purpose for which subsequent remedial measures may be admitted if the defendant disputes that a precaution was possible.

22
New cards

Attempts to Compromise or Compromises

A limited exclusion where conduct or statements made during negotiations are inadmissible to prove the validity or amount of a disputed claim.

23
New cards

Disputed Claim Requirement

The prerequisite for the compromise exclusion, requiring that there was a claim in dispute as to either validity or amount at the time of the statements.

24
New cards

Payments or Offers to Pay Medical Expenses

Evidence that is inadmissible to prove liability for injuries, though it differs from compromise offers as accompanying admissions of fact are admissible.

25
New cards

Accompanying statements of fact (Medical Expenses)

Admissions of fact made alongside offers to pay medical expenses, which are admissible under the Federal Rules.

26
New cards

Plea Bargain Exclusion

A broad exclusion in criminal or civil cases against a defendant for offers to plead guilty, withdrawn guilty pleas, or statements made during plea discussions.

27
New cards

Nolo contendere

A 'no contest' plea which is generally inadmissible against the defendant who made it in subsequent litigation.

28
New cards

Insurance for Liability [FRE 411]

Evidence of a party’s insurance coverage (or lack thereof) that is inadmissible to prove negligence or whether they acted wrongfully.

29
New cards

Ownership or Control Disputed

A specific instance where evidence of insurance or subsequent remedial measures may be admissible if the party's authority over the property is in controversy.

30
New cards

Industry Custom

Evidence of how others in the same trade acted, used to show the appropriate standard of care, though it is not conclusive.

31
New cards

Sales of Similar Property

Evidence of transactions involving similar personal or real property around the same time period, admissible to prove value.

32
New cards

Rebutting Claim of Impossibility

A situation where the requirement for prior occurrences to be similar is relaxed to counter a claim that an event (like a car reaching a certain speed) is impossible.

33
New cards

Bias or Prejudice

A ground for which evidence of compromise/negotiations may be admitted to impeach a witness.

34
New cards

Direct admissions of liability

Statements made during compromise negotiations that are typically inadmissible to prove the validity of a disputed claim.

35
New cards

Miscellaneous proceedings

Specific legal contexts where Federal Rules do not apply, including sentencing, extradition, bail, and probation.