metaphysics quiz #2

What is the main idea expressed in the discussion regarding the table's properties and identity?

The table can change qualitatively (e.g., being painted a different color, different looks, surface) while remaining as the same object.

What distinguishes numerical sameness from qualitative change?

Numerical sameness refers to an object being the same entity (e.g., the same table) even while its properties (e.g., color) change qualitatively.

How does the metaphor of a pin cushion help explain the relationship between an object and its properties?

In this metaphor, the pin cushion stands for the object itself (like a table), while the pins represent its different properties (such as color and texture). The analogy shows that even if the pins (properties) change or are rearranged, the pin cushion (the object) remains the same, emphasizing how an object can maintain its identity despite changes in its characteristics.

What is the substratum view of particulars?

The substratum view says that a specific object (particulars), like a table or a chair, is supported by a core part that keeps all of its features together. This means that even if the object's color or shape changes, the main part that makes it that object stays the same.

What happens when all properties (traits and characteristics that define a cat) are mentally abstracted from a cat?

It raises the question of what remains, implying that the core identity could be perceived as a non-thing.

What conclusion is drawn about 'bare' particulars existing without properties?

It suggests that every existing thing must have properties, and that a thing cannot exist without properties

What is the bundle view of particulars?

It suggests that an object is simply a group of its properties, with no hidden identity (essence/substance), meaning objects are defined only by their traits.

How does the change of properties impact the bundle view's explanation of particulars?

If a particular is merely a collection of properties, any change creates a new collection, thus contradicting the notion that the particular remains the same.

What solution is offered to address the bundle view's objection regarding constant change?

A particular could be viewed as a series of bundles of properties, united by continuity, allowing for properties to change while still maintaining identity.

What is the advantage of the bundle view over the substratum view?

The bundle view makes it easier to understand objects by removing the need for a hidden core, focusing only on their properties.

Why do philosophers like simpler theories, such as the bundle view?

Philosophers favor simpler theories because they have less unnecessary complexity and explain things more clearly.